Angewandte
Chemie
Table 1: Rhodium-catalyzed asymmetric cyclopropanation of styrene
1a.[a]
produced 3a in 81% yield with 75% ee (Table 1, entry 9). It is
remarkable that the use of C1-symmetric L6 substituted with a
methyl and a 2-(amido)phenyl group gave 3a in 76% yield
(Table 1, entry 10). These results indicate that the presence of
one amide group on the ligand is responsible for the high
catalytic activity. The use of isolated monomeric rhodium–
diene complex [RhCl((R,R)-L5)] (Scheme 3, see below)
Entry
Rhodium catalyst
Yield [%][b]
ee [%][c]
1
2
3
4
[{RhCl((R)-binap)}2]
0
0
–
–
–
[{RhCl((R)-binap)}2]/NaBArF
4
[RhCl(PPh3)((R,R)-L1)]/NaBArF
4[d]
3[d]
11
11[d]
64
70
81
76
84
3[d]
86
62
[e]
4
[e]
[{RhCl((R,R)-L2)}2]
–
[{RhCl((R,R)-L2)}2]/NaBArF
6 (S)
–
Scheme 3. Synthesis of [RhCl((R,R)-L5)].
5
4
6[f]
7
[{RhCl((R,R)-L2)}2]/NaBArF
[e]
4
[RhCl(C2H4)2]2/(R,R)-L3/NaBArF
[RhCl(C2H4)2]2/(R,R)-L4/NaBArF
[RhCl(C2H4)2]2/(R,R)-L5/NaBArF
[RhCl(C2H4)2]2/(S,S)-L6/NaBArF
33 (S)
39 (S)
75 (S)
43 (R)
83 (S)
4
4
4
combined with NaBArF led to higher enantioselectivity
8
9
4
compared with that generated in situ and gave 3a in 84%
yield with 83% ee (Table 1, entry 11). In the absence of
10
11
12
13[g]
14[g,h]
4
[RhCl((R,R)-L5)]/NaBArF
[RhCl((R,R)-L5)]
NaBArF , the complex [RhCl((R,R)-L5)] had no catalytic
4
4
[e]
–
activity, indicating that an active single coordination site on a
cationic rhodium is essential for the catalytic activity (Table 1,
entry 12). The reaction proceeded well even at 408C to give
3a in 86% yield with 89% ee (Table 1, entry 13). The
cyclopropanation of 1.2 equiv of styrene also proceeded,
although a slight decrease of the yield and ee value was
observed (62% yield with 84% ee; Table 1, entry 14). The
absolute configuration of 3a produced by use of (R,R)-L5 was
determined to be (S)-(À) by comparison of its specific
rotation with the value reported previously.[19]
We succeeded in the determination of the structure of the
chloro rhodium complex [RhCl((R,R)-L5)] by X-ray crystal-
lographic analysis (Scheme 3 and Figure 1a).[20] A rhodium(I)
center of [RhCl((R,R)-L5)] is coordinated with a diene
moiety and a carbonyl oxygen on the benzene ring together
with a chloride ligand. The 1H NMR spectrum (CDCl3) of the
complex [RhCl((R,R)-L5)] had signals corresponding to two
non-equivalent vinylic groups (d = 2.95 and 4.03 ppm) and
two bridgehead protons (d = 5.55 and 5.99 ppm), which
indicates that the complex is not a chloro-bridged dimer but
[RhCl((R,R)-L5)]/NaBArF
[RhCl((R,R)-L5)]/NaBArF
89 (S)
84 (S)
4
4
[a] Reaction conditions: rhodium catalyst (2 mol% of Rh), 1a (5 equiv),
2 (0.50m), with or without NaBArF4 (4 mol%) in toluene at 608C for 24 h.
Rh/L=(1.0:1.1) in entries 7–10. [b] Yield of isolated product. [c] Deter-
mined by HPLC analysis with chiral stationary phase column (Chiralcel
OD-H). [d] Determined by 1H NMR. [e] Not determined. [f] For 48 h.
[g] At 408C for 48 h. [h] Reaction of 1.2 equiv of styrene.
rhodium/bisphosphine
catalyst
[{RhCl((R)-binap)}2][17]
(2 mol% Rh) had no catalytic activity for the formation of
cyclopropane diester 3a with or without NaBArF (4 mol%)
4
(ArF = 3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl), which was used for
the generation of cationic complexes (Table 1, entries 1 and
2). The [RhCl(PPh3)((R,R)-L1)]/NaBArF catalyst, which
4
efficiently catalyzes the asymmetric cycloisomerization of
1,6-enynes (Scheme 1), gave only 4% yield of 3a (Table 1,
entry 3). The rhodium catalyst coordinated with phenyl
substituted tfb ligand L2 [{RhCl((R,R)-L2)}2][16a] was also
inactive for the present reaction (Table 1, entry 4). Although
the cationic RhI/L2 catalyst gave an 11% yield of 3a (Table 1,
entry 5), the ee value of 3a was low (6% ee) and the catalyst
lost its catalytic activity, resulting in 11% yield of 3a even
after a prolonged reaction time (48 hours; Table 1, entry 6).[18]
In contrast, newly designed chiral diene ligands L3–L6
bearing an ester or an amide group at the ortho position of
the phenyl ring were found to display high catalytic activity
(Table 1, entries 7–10). Thus, the reaction in the presence of
[{RhCl(C2H4)2}2], (R,R)-L3 (2 mol% of Rh, Rh/L3 = 1.0/1.1),
and NaBArF gave 64% yield of 3a with 33% ee (Table 1,
4
entry 7). The use of L4 substituted with (diethylamido)phenyl
groups also gave 3a in 70% yield with 39% ee (Table 1,
entry 8). Higher enantioselectivities were observed by using
L5, which contains 2-(diisopropylamido)phenyl groups and
Figure 1. a) ORTEP of [RhCl((R,R)-L5)] (ellipsoids set at 50% proba-
bility level; hydrogen atoms omitted for clarity). b) ORTEP of [Rh-
((R,R)-L5)PF6] set at 50% probability level. The PF6À counterion and
the hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 7324 –7327
ꢀ 2010 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
7325