J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 111, No. 3, 15 July 1999
Relaxation from linear to triangular Ag3
1021
time zero. This can only be explained if a second resonant
state is involved in the ionization process. Such a state is
indeed predicted by the calculation, and in Fig. 5 the two
2
2
proposed participating states are labeled A1 and B1 , re-
spectively. They have opposite slopes along the bending
mode Qx so that only at ⌬tϭ0 the two transition energies
coincide accidentally.
CONCLUSION
We presented extended measurements on the Ag3 mol-
ecule using a bound–bound transition via intermediate reso-
nant states. Two excited states are seen at short delays as a
resonance in the linear geometry of the molecule. The strong
change of the ion signal close to zero delay time implies
large differences in the gradients of the potential energy sur-
faces involved in the ionization process, particularly in the
region near the linear configuration of the molecule. The 2E
Љ
excited state we believe to contribute to the resonant absorp-
tion after partial relaxation of the linear molecule. Here, the
maximum in ionization probability was found in the geom-
etry of an obtuse isosceles, nearly equilateral triangle. The
lack of oscillation we attribute to fast IVR processes after
collision of terminal atoms along the relaxation path. Over-
all, both the theoretical and the experimental findings reflect
the tendency of collisions to enhance the spread in phase
space of partially coherent systems and provide a molecular
understanding of the fast intermolecular redistribution pro-
cesses of vibrational energy that can be found in molecules
as small as a metal trimer.
FIG. 5. Cut along the bending coordinate Qx through the potential energy
surfaces of the resonant states of Ag3 used for the NeNePo experiments. The
optical transitions are indicated as arrows.
way gives rise to the spectra given in Fig. 4. As a conse-
quence of the IVR processes discussed above, this part of the
PES is not revisited at later times and therefore the signal in
Fig. 4 declines at larger delay times.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
´
We thank the group of Professor Bonacic-Koutecky for
fruitful discussions. This work was supported by the Deut-
sche Forschungsgemeinschaft in the Sonderforschungsbere-
ich 337.
Tuning the wavelength for one pulse from the UV ͑370
nm͒ into the green ͑500 nm͒ as done in the second set of
measurements ͑Fig. 3͒, the picture changes completely. In-
stead of a minimum we find a maximum in cation intensity
for delay time zero. Additionally, a shoulder is found in the
cation signal at positive delay times around ⌬tϭ500 fs. As
can be seen from the decomposition of the data performed in
Fig. 3, the shoulder clearly resembles the signal obtained in
the one-color experiments at 400 nm ͑cf. Fig. 2͒. As in both
cases the ionization is performed at 400 nm, we conclude
that a variation of the photodetachment wavelength from 400
to 500 nm has no marked effect on the subsequent bending
dynamics of the neutral molecule. This implies that most of
the excess energy of the photodetachment laser is transferred
into the photoelectron and does not remain in the molecule.
The most prominent feature in the spectrum, however, is the
peak around ⌬tϭ0. For energetic reasons, such an ionization
requires the absorption of three photons. Because of the
strong enhancement in the ion signal using the pulse at 500
nm compared to the one at 400 nm, we assume that the linear
silver trimer can be ionized resonantly at 500 nm. If there
was only one resonant state participating in the process, one
should expect to observe a wavelength shift of the resonance
as the wave packet evolves on the PES. Instead, the signal
vanishes at all delay times outside a narrow range around
1
¨
S. Wolf, G. Sommerer, S. Rutz, E. Schreiber, T. Leisner, L. Woste, and R.
S. Berry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4177 ͑1995͒.
2 T. Leisner, S. Rutz, G. Sommerer, S. Vajda, S. Wolf, E. Schreiber, and L.
¨
Woste, in Fast Elementary Processes in Chemical and Biological Systems,
AIP Conf. Proc. No. 364 ͑AIP, New York, 1996͒, p. 603.
3 R. S. Berry, V. Bonacic-Koutecky, J. Gaus, T. Leisner, J. Manz, B.
Reischl-Lenz, H. Ruppe, S. Rutz, E. Schreiber, S. Vajda, R. de Vivie-
¨
Riedle, S. Wolf, and L. Woste, Adv. Chem. Phys. 101, 101 ͑1997͒.
4 D. W. Boo, Y. Ozaki, L. H. Andersen, and W. C. Lineberger, J. Phys.
Chem. A 101, 6688 ͑1997͒.
5 H. O. Jeschke, M. E. Garcia, and K. H. Bennemann, Phys. Rev. A 54,
R4601 ͑1996͒.
6 H. O. Jeschke, M. E. Garcia, and K. H. Bennemann, J. Phys. B 29, L545
͑1996͒.
7
´
M. Hartmann, J. Pittner, V. Bonacic-Koutecky, A. Heidenreich, and J.
Jortner, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 3096 ͑1998͒.
8
´
M. Warken and V. Bonacic-Koutecky, Chem. Phys. Lett. 272, 284 ͑1997͒.
9 O. Rubner, C. Meier, and V. Engel, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 1066 ͑1997͒.
10 C. Yannouleas and U. Landman, J. Phys. Chem. A 102, 2505 ͑1998͒.
11
¨
¨
¨
R. Keller, F. Nohmeier, P. Spadtke, and M. H. Schonenberg, Vacuum 34,
31 ͑1984͒.
12 L. Hanley, S. A. Ruatta, and S. L. Andersson, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 260
͑1987͒.
13 G. G. Dolnikowski, M. J. Kristo, C. G. Enke, and J. T. Watson, Int. J.
Mass Spectrom. Ion Phys. 82, 1 ͑1988͒.
14 K. LaiHing, P. Y. Cheng, and M. A. Duncan, Z. Phys. D 13, 161 ͑1989͒.
15 E. E. Wedum, E. R. Grant, P. Y. Cheng, K. F. Willey, and M. A. Duncan,
J. Chem. Phys. 100, 6312 ͑1994͒.
130.70.241.163 On: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 08:56:54