pholane ligands (Figure 1) using glass bottle reactors, 1-12
h reaction times, and 1.1 equiv of ligand.
During the course of our studies, we were unable to
achieve high enantioselectivities for 1,3-dienes that comprise
(E) and (Z) stereoisomer mixtures. This suggests that the
enantioselectivity of the reaction depends on the 1,3-diene
stereochemistry. For example, subjecting (E)-1-trisisopro-
pylsilyoxy-1,3-diene to AHF yielded the 2-formyl aldehyde
2.5:1 ratio of the (E)- and (Z)-stereoisomers (Scheme 2) and
Scheme 2. Substrate Stereochemistry Effect
Figure 1. Diazaphospholane ligand structures.
with 90% enantiomeric excess for the (Z)-product (we were
unable to determine the ee of the (E)-product). On the other
hand, AHF of the (Z)-stereoisomer gives the 2-formyl
aldehyde with identical 2:1 E:Z ratio and, for the (Z)-product,
the opposite sense of chirality in only 70% enantiomeric
excess. Thus, we focused our attention primarily on 1,3-
dienes that could be obtained as pure samples of the (E)-
stereoisomer.
AHF of monosubstituted 1,3-dienes bearing aromatic and
heteroaromatic substituents (entries 1 and 2) gives excellent
enantioselectivities (91% ee and 97% ee, respectively) and
exclusive formation of the (E)-stereoisomer. AHF of dienyl
ethers produces 2-formyl aldehydes with high levels of
enatioselectivity (90-94% ee). However, these aldehydes
exist as a 1:1 mixture of (E)- and (Z)-stereoisomers, with
somewhat reduced enantioselectivity observed for the (Z)-
isomer. Attempts to increase the stereoselectivity by incor-
porating a sterically demanding TIPS group (entry 5)
provided only a small increase in stereoselectivity (2.5:1 E:Z)
while maintaining excellent enantioselectivity. Dienyl ethers
are interesting substrates for AHF because reduction of both
the aldehyde and alkene provides a straightforward route to
monoprotected chiral 1,4-butanediols. Highly selective AHF
extends to carboethoxy-1,3-pentadiene (Table 1, entry 6).
AHF of this 1,1-disubstituted diene completes in only 1.5 h
yielding exclusively the (E)-stereoisomer of the ꢀ,γ-unsatur-
ated, 2-formyl aldehyde in 91% enantiomeric excess.
One approach to non-AHF, direct synthesis of chiral ꢀ,γ-
unsaturated aldehydes involves the asymmetric organocata-
lytic addition of vinyl triflourborate salts to “SOMO”
activated nascent enamines as reported by MacMillan and
Kim.6 Hydroformylation of dienes presents many opportuni-
ties for the synthesis of both fine and commodity chemicals.7
AHF of dienes to yield chiral ꢀ,γ-unsaturated aldehydes
intrinsically are advantaged due to the mild temperatures and
essentially neutral pH, so long as the stereoselectivity of the
double bond, along with regioselectivity and enantioselec-
tivity of formylation, are controlled. For the dienes examined
herein, 2-formyl products are preferred (see eq 1 for the
numbering scheme used for all products and reactants).
We initiated our studies by evaluating the hydroformyla-
tion of (E)-1-phenyl-1,3-butadiene (4) under conditions of
150 psi synthesis gas (1:1 CO:H2) using 0.5 mol % of
Rh(acac)(CO)2 and 0.55 mol % of ligands 1-38 at 40 °C
(Scheme 1). The reactions were complete within 4 h,
Scheme 1. Ligand Influence on Enantioselectivity
(5) (a) Smejkal, T.; Han, H.; Breit, B.; Krische, M. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2009, 131, 10036. (b) Horiuchi, T.; Ohta, T.; Nozaki, K.; Takaya, H.
Chem. Commun. 1996, 155. (c) Horiuchi, T.; Ohta, T.; Shirakawa, E.;
Nozaki, K.; Takaya, H. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 7795.
producing the ꢀ,γ-unsaturated 2-formyl regioisomer as the
sole product in each case. Although excellent enantioselec-
tivity (90% ee) was observed with use of ligand 1, only
modest enantioselectivities of 60% ee and 26% ee were
obtained with ligands 2 and 3, respectively. All three ligands
yielded (E) alkene stereochemistry, exclusively.
(6) Kim, H.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 398.
(7) (a) Clement, W. H.; Orchin, M. Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. DeV.
1965, 4, 283. (b) Fell, B.; Bahrmann, H. J. Mol. Catal. 1977, 2, 211. (c)
Bahrmann, H.; Fell, B. J. Mol. Catal. 1980, 8, 329. (d) Botteghi, C.; Branca,
M.; Saba, A. J. Organomet. Chem. 1980, 184, C17. (e) van Leeuwen,
P. W. N. M.; Roobeek, C. F. J. Mol. Catal. 1985, 31, 345. (f) Chalchat,
J. C.; Garry, R. P.; Lecomte, E.; Michet, A. FlaVour Fragrance J. 1991, 6,
178. (g) Bertozzi, S.; Campigli, N.; Vitulli, G.; Lazzaroni, R.; Salvadori,
P. J. Organomet. Chem. 1995, 487, 41. (h) Barros, H. J. V.; Hanson, B. E.;
dos Santos, E. N.; Gusevskaya, E. V. Appl. Catal., A 2004, 278, 57. (i)
Barros, H. J. V.; da Silva, J. G.; Guimaraes, C. C.; dos Santos, E. N.;
Gusevskaya, E. V. Organometallics 2008, 27, 4523.
(8) Ligands 1 and 2 are commercially available from Sigma Aldrich.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 1, 2011
165