We considered the use of chiral auxiliaries to effect the
stereoselective addition of hard nucleophiles to ketones. Most
applications of chiral auxiliaries incorporate the stereodi-
recting group onto the nucleophilic component of the
reaction.17 The sulfoxide group represents a rare example
of a chiral auxiliary which usually resides on the electrophilic
reaction partner.18 The Ellman group has popularized the
use of tert-butyl sulfinamide for the synthesis of optically
active amines.19 Likewise, the groups of Colobert and Toru
have demonstrated the utility of sulfoxide chiral auxiliaries
in asymmetric additions to aldehydes.20 These applications,
in turn, built on a rich literature describing the use of
sulfoxides in asymmetric reductions, conjugate additions, and
Diels-Alder cycloadditions pioneered by the group of Garc´ıa
Ruano among others.18 Here we show that the toluene
sulfinyl group effectively controls the asymmetric addition
of simple alkynyl, aryl and vinyl organometallic reagents to
aryl ketones (eq 1). In contrast to most previous studies, the
methodology utilizes readily available Grignard reagents and
lithium acetylides. Furthermore, we demonstrate the reductive
lithiation of the sulfoxide and its conversion to other useful
functionality.
Table 1. Addition of Organometallic Reagents to Aryl Ketonesa
a Reactions carried out on a 20 mg scale at 0.07-0.08 M. b Conversion
1
(Conv) and diastereomeric ratio (dr) determined by H NMR analysis of
the crude reaction mixture. c 1.2 equiv of acetylide was used. d Isolated
yield shown in parentheses.
Toluene sulfinyl groups can be introduced onto an aromatic
nucleus through the stereospecific reaction of menthol
sulfinate with an aryl lithium reagent.20a,21 The requisite
sulfinate is commercially available but can also be prepared
conveniently in large scale from the reductive coupling of
toluene sulfonyl chloride with menthol.22 With these con-
siderations in mind, we prepared methyl ketone 1a23 and
examined its reactivity toward a variety of organometallic
reagents, initially focusing on the synthesis of propargylic
alcohols. The lithium anion of phenyl acetylene provided
tertiary alcohol 2a with good diastereoselectivity, but in
unsatisfactory yield (Table 1, entry 1). Alkynyl Grignard
reagents were even more selective but did not fully consume
the sulfoxide. A less basic organocerium reagent24 com-
pletely consumed the ketone and provided the tertiary alcohol
as a ca. 50:1 mixture of diastereomers (entry 4). Using less
than 2 equiv of the nucleophile resulted in incomplete
consumption of 1a (entry 3).
We extended our study to include the addition of aryl
nucleophiles. Using either the arylcerium reagent (entry 5)
or the aryl Grignard (entry 6), we obtained excellent
diastereoselectivity, as only one diastereomer was observed
in the crude reaction mixture. In contrast to the reactivity
profile observed with acetylides, however, the inclusion of
CeCl3 in the reaction mixture actually decreased conversion
when aryl nucleophiles were used. Nonetheless, simple
Grignard reagents generated the desired product in high yield.
Phenyl lithium proved equally selective, but conversion was
incomplete using this reagent (entry 7). Finally, alkyl and
allyl Grignard reagents displayed poor diastereoselectivity
(ca. 4:1) and yielded complex mixtures of products.
Using the optimal reaction conditions for the addition of
acetylides (Table 1, entry 4) and aryl Grignards (Table 1,
entry 6), we explored the generality of the methodology. As
shown in Table 2, a wide range of optically active, tertiary
benzylic alcohols were prepared in high yield. Alkyl-, aryl-,
and silyl-substituted alkynes added to methyl (entries 1-5,
24, 26), ethyl (entries 11-13), and aryl (entry 21) ketones
with crude diastereoselectivities > 10:1. Likewise, electron-
rich, -poor, and -neutral aryl Grignards added to several
ketones with at least 50:1 diastereoselectivities. Importantly,
the addition could accommodate alkenyl Grignard reagents
as well: vinyl (entry 9), 2-propenyl (entries 10, 18, 23) and
2-methyl-1-propenyl (entry 22) magnesium bromide yielded
benzylic, allylic alcohols in at least 20:1 dr. Additional
substitution was tolerated on the aryl sulfoxide fragment as
well, including halogens (entries 15-19, 24-25) and tri-
(12) (a) Saito, B.; Katsuki, T. Synlett 2004, 1557. (b) Jiang, B.; Chen,
Z.; Tang, X. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3451.
(13) (a) Jiang, B.; Chen, Z.; Tang, X. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3451. (b) Lu,
G.; Li, X.; Jia, X.; Chan, W. L.; Chan, A. S. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2003, 42, 5057. (d) Chen, C.; Hong, L.; Xu, Z.-Q.; Liu, L.; Wang, R. Org.
Lett. 2006, 8, 2277.
(14) (a) Cozzi, P. G.; Alesi, S. Chem. Commun. 2004, 2448. (b) Zhou,
Y.; Wang, R.; Xu, Z.; Yan, W.; Liu, L.; Kang, Y.; Han, Z. Org. Lett. 2004,
6, 4147.
(15) Liu, L.; Wang, R.; Kang, Y.-F.; Cai, H.-Q.; Chen, C. Synlett 2006,
1245.
(16) For an alternative strategy, see: Bagutski, V.; French, R. M.;
Aggarwal, V. K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 5142.
(17) Evans, D. A.; Helmchen, G.; Ruping, M.; Wolfgang, J. In
Asymmetric Synthesis, 2nd ed.; Christmann, M. S. B. Ed.; Wiley-VCH:
Weinheim, 2007; pp 3-9.
(18) (a) Carreno, M. C. Chem. ReV. 1995, 95, 1717. (b) Garc´ıa Ruano,
J. L.; Mart´ın Castro, A. M.; Rodriguez, J. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32,
3195. (c) Garc´ıa Ruano, J. L.; Ferna´ndez-Iba´n˜ez, M. A.; Ferna´ndez-Salas,
J. A.; Maestro, M. C.; Ma´rquez-Lo´pez, P.; Rodr´ıguez-Ferna´ndez, M. M. J.
Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 1200.
(19) Robak, M. T.; Herbage, M. A.; Ellman, J. A. Chem. ReV. 2010,
110, 3600.
(20) (a) Novodomska`, A.; Dudicova`, M.; Leroux, F. R.; Colobert, F.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2007, 18, 1628. (b) Nakamura, S.; Oda, M.;
Yasuda, H.; Toru, T. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 8469.
(21) (a) Andersen, K. K.; Gaffield, W.; Papanikolaou, N. E.; Foley, J.;
Perkins, R. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 5637. (b) Drabowicz, J.; Bujnicki,
B.; Mikolajczyk, M. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 3325
.
(22) Klunder, J. M.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 2598.
(23) Full experimental details are provided in the Supporting Informa-
tion.
(24) Imamoto, T. Pure Appl. Chem. 1990, 62, 747.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 2, 2011
185