C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
selectivity >10:1; path C favored) (see the Supporting Information).
The somewhat reduced selectivity in the case of mesitylene to give
4a may be explained by the exclusion of path A in this case.
Acknowledgment. This work is dedicated to Professor Carmen
Na´jera on the occasion of her 60th birthday. Financial support from
the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacio´n (MICINN) of Spain [Projects
CTQ2008-05409-C02-01, CTQ2009-07881, and Consolider Ingenio
2010 (CSD2007-00006)] and DURSI-Generalitat de Catalunya
(SGR 2009-1441) is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Dr. J.
Orduna for the MALDI-TOF spectra and B. Noverges and Dr. G.
Guirado for CV measurements; we also thank Prof. J. Marquet for
insightful discussions.
Scheme 5. Competition between Paths B and C Using
Monomesitylbinaphthalene 6a and Two Different Arenes
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures,
spectral and analytical data for all products, and crystallographic data
for 2a (CIF). This material is available free of charge via the Internet
Following a suggestion by a referee, we also determined that,
as Scheme 4 indicates, the rates associated with paths B and C
(and therefore the 4/2 ratio) are sensitive to the amount of ArH
employed. Thus, while the use of 4 equiv of mesitylene in the
arylation of binaphthalene led to selective formation of 4a (Table
1), the use of 12 equiv of mesitylene led to an erosion in the
selectivity down to a 2a/4a ratio of ∼1:1. It is interesting to note,
however, that even under such biased conditions, the reaction still
affords significant amounts of the tetranaphthalene product 4a.
There remains a question as to what governs the different
reactivity of naphthalene, binaphthalene, and higher oligonaphtha-
lenes under the Kita conditions. Thus, while monoarylated 1a or
dimeric 2a was the principal product with naphthalene and selective
dimerization was observed for binaphthalene, we found that both
ternaphthyl and tetranaphthyl (5) underwent selective diarylation
to give 3 and 4, respectively. Although we were able to observe
the presence of the formal dimerization product Ar-(Nap)6-Ar
from ternaphthyl by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, the yield
of this oligomer did not exceed 3-4%. The difficulty in explaining
this trend is due to the relatively scarce mechanistic studies of the
Kita coupling. If the proposal of a radical-based mechanism is
accepted,4c the differential reactivity must be governed by the
relative redox potentials of the species involved. Our measurements
in both CH2Cl2 and N,N-dimethylformamide confirmed that bi-
naphthalene (Eox ) 1.69 V) and monarylated 6a (Eox ) 1.72 V)
are more easily oxidized than naphthalene (Eox ) 1.80 V), consistent
with a greater tendency of the binaphthyl derivatives to undergo
dimerization. However, further mechanistic studies are required to
explain the reactivities of ter- and tetranaphthyl and to rule out a
potential Scholl-type acid-base mechanism.
It is expected that the three stereogenic Ar-Ar junctions (aR or
aS) present in 4a would lead to the existence of atropisomeric forms.
With a 23.5 kcal/mol interconversion barrier, these forms should
be observable by NMR spectroscopy.12,13 Indeed, the 13C NMR
spectrum of 4a contains a complex set of signals suggestive of the
presence of several diastereomers (see the Supporting Informa-
tion).14
Traditionally, oligonaphthalenes have been the subject of con-
siderable interest in the field of dyes and organic optical devices,
where they serve either as precursors to the long aromatic systems15
or in their own right.16 Since their synthesis has typically involved
a sequence of metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions, the protocol
reported herein represents a remarkably direct one-step access to
4a by a regioselective intermolecular four-component assembly via
the functionalization of six C-H bonds to give three new C-C
bonds. Current work is focused on further establishing the scope
and limitations of this approach.
References
(1) (a) Scholl, R.; Seer, C. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1912, 394, 111–117. For a
review, see: (b) Kovacic, P.; Jones, M. B. Chem. ReV. 1987, 87, 357–379.
Also see: (c) King, B. T.; Kroul´ık, J.; Robertson, C. R.; Rempala, P.; Hilton,
C. L.; Korinek, J. D.; Gortari, L. M. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 2279–2288,
and references therein.
(2) For a recent review of direct aryl-aryl coupling, see: McGlacken, G. P.;
Bateman, L. M. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2009, 38, 2447–2464.
(3) (a) Simpson, C. D.; Mattersteig, G.; Martin, K.; Gherghel, L.; Bauer, R. E.;
Ra¨der, H. J.; Mu¨llen, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 3139–3147. (b)
Wu, K.; Pisula, W.; Mu¨llen, K. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 718–747.
(4) (a) Takada, T.; Arisawa, M.; Gyoten, M.; Hamada, R.; Tohma, H.; Kita,
Y. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 7698–7706. (b) Tohma, H.; Iwata, M.;
Maegawa, T.; Kita, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 9241–9244. (c) Dohi,
T.; Ito, M.; Morimoto, K.; Iwata, M.; Kita, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008,
47, 1301–1304. (d) Dohi, T.; Ito, M.; Yamaoka, N.; Morimoto, K.; Fujioka,
H.; Kita, Y. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 10797–10815. (e) Kita, Y.; Morimoto,
K.; Ito, M.; Ogawa, C.; Goto, A.; Dohi, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131,
1668–1669.
(5) (a) Ouyang, Q.; Zhu, Y.-Z.; Zhang, C.-H.; Yan, K.-Q.; Li, Y.-C.; Zheng,
J.-Y. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 5266–5269. (b) Kar, A.; Mangu, N.; Kaiser, H. M.;
Beller, M.; Tse, M. K. Chem. Commun. 2008, 386–388. (c) Shen, D.-M.;
Liu, C.; Chen, X.-G.; Chen, Q.-Y. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 206–211. (d)
Gu, Y.; Wang, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 2004–2006.
(6) The diastereotopicity of the o-Me groups is due to their position above the
mutually opposed termini of the remote naphthalene group (see the
Supporting Information).
(7) X-ray data for 2a: C38H34; Mr ) 490.65,; monoclinic; P2/c; a ) 24.806(2)
Å, b ) 9.6651(8) Å, c ) 24.423(2) Å, ꢀ ) 106.87(2)°; V ) 5603.5(10)
Å3; Z ) 8; Mo KR, λ ) 0.71073 Å; T ) 110(2) K; 2θmax ) 52.74; 118667/
11450 reflns collected/independent (Rint ) 0.1170); R1[I > 2σ(I)] ) 0.0426,
wR2(all data) ) 0.0900; ∆Fmax ) 0.15 e Å-3; 697 parameters; two
independent molecules in the asymmetric unit. The crystallographic data
can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data
(8) The connectivity of 2a was also confirmed by its independent synthesis
from 4,4′-dibromobinaphthalene via Negishi coupling with mesitylzinc
chloride (see the Supporting Information).
(9) Lower yields of 2a were obtained with other common oxidants, such as
PhI(OAc)2, PhI(OH)(OTs), and MoCl5; and only traces of 2a were obtained
with FeCl3, CuCl2/AlCl3, or Pb(OAc)4 (see the Supporting Information).
(10) Kovacic, P.; Koch, F. W. J. Org. Chem. 1965, 30, 3176–3181, and
references therein.
(11) For examples of the formation of oligonaphthalenes under the Scholl
coupling conditions, see: Percec, V.; Wang, J. H.; Okita, S. J. Polym. Sci.,
Part A: Polym. Chem. 1992, 30, 429–428.
(12) For resolution of 2,2′-substituted oligonaphthalene atropisomers, see:
Tsubaki, K.; Takaishi, K.; Sue, D.; Kawabata, T. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72,
4238–4241.
(13) The measured racemization barrier for 1,1′-binaphthalene is 23.5 kcal/mol.
See: (a) Cooke, A. S.; Harris, M. M. J. Chem. Soc. 1963, 2365. Also see:
(b) Pu, L. Chem. ReV. 1998, 98, 2405–2494.
(14) Similarly, complex 13C NMR spectra were recorded for products 4b-e;
HPLC separation of the atropisomers has to date proven unsuccessful.
(15) (a) Pschirer, N. G.; Kohl, C.; Nolde, F.; Qu, J.; Mu¨llen, K. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1401-1404; Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 1429-1432. (b)
Buffet, N. (Essilor Int.); Bock, H. (CNRS). Int. Patent Appl. WO
2009141562 A2, 2009. Also see: (c) Schmidt-Mende, L.; Fechtenko¨tter,
A.; Mu¨llen, K.; Moons, E.; Friend, R. H.; MacKenzie, J. D. Science 2001,
293, 1119.
(16) Wang, G.; Uchida, M.; Koike, T.; Kawashima, M. (Chisso Corp.). Int. Patent
Appl. WO 2005091686 A1, 2005.
JA107467C
9
17982 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 51, 2010