316
M. Baqar et al. / Polymer 52 (2011) 307e317
Table 4
4. Conclusions
TGA data of poly(benzoxazine-co-urethane) films cured up to 180 ꢀC.
A new concept to produce polybenzoxazine/PU copolymers has
been developed by incorporating oxazine and urethane groups in
one molecule through main-chain type poly(benzoxazine-co-
urethane)s. These copolymers have been synthesized via copoly-
merization of diisocyanate monomer with a dimethylol-functional
benzoxazine monomer and polyol to afford a linear main-chain
type polymer. The produced copolymers were further crosslinked
through thermally activated ring opening polymerization of ben-
zoxazine to produce network structure. Films were subjected to
mechanical and thermal tests and the results were associated with
the chemical structure of corresponding films according to the
content of benzoxazine in the moiety. This novel class of poly-
benzoxazine/PU materials is characterized by the following:
Sample
Td5 (ꢀC)
Td10 (ꢀC)
Char yield (%)
Poly(I-0)
280
300
293
287
285
311
333
323
310
309
53.0
44.3
35.0
27.5
17.5
Poly(I-10)
Poly(I-20)
Poly(I-30)
Poly(I-40)
and poly(I-10), respectively. This behavior is attributed to the
increased chain mobility of the copolymer as a result of decreasing
the crosslinking density that leads to decreased Tg.
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) has been used to investigate
the thermal stability of the crosslinked poly(benzoxazine-co-
urethane) films. Fig. 13 shows the TGA profiles of copolymer films
after 180 ꢀC treatment. The results of TGA are summarized in Table
4. The thermal stability of poly(I-0), which can be used as a control,
shows an early weight loss from 280 ꢀC. 4HBA-ddm monomer
which has been used in this study is a methylol functional end-
capped benzoxazine which, by thermal treatment, will condensate
to produce water at about 200 ꢀC, similar to traditional resole. Since
the copolymer poly(I-0) contains the highest content of 4HBA-ddm
and the thermal treatment did not exceed 180 ꢀC, the early weight
lost is attributed to the condensation reaction of methylol end
groups in the copolymer which will be discussed in details else-
where [41]. For the rest of the crosslinked copolymers, a higher
benzoxazine content led to an improvement in the onset of the
degradation as can be seen from the 5 and 10% weight loss
temperatures, Td5 and Td10. For example, Td5s are 300, 293, 287,
and 285 ꢀC whereas Td10s are 333, 323, 310, and 309 ꢀC for samples
poly(I-10), poly(I-20), poly(I-30), and poly(I-40), respectively. The
onset of degradation is higher than the control due to the absence
of methylol groups that are consumed for urethane linkage
formation. Although depolymerization of urethane bonds occurred
at about 240 ꢀC [8], the incorporation of benzoxazine in the poly
(benzoxazine-co-urethane) copolymer shifted the decomposition
temperature to w285e300 ꢀC, depending on the benzoxazine
content. The onset of the degradation did not improve significantly,
since the increase of the benzoxazine content will shift the initial
weight to low temperature due to methylol condensation. On the
other hand, the increase of polyol content as aliphatic component
will contribute to the shift of initial weight loss to lower temper-
ature. Despite the aforementioned reasons of the initial weight loss
of the copolymers, the thermal stability of this new system is still
comparable with the reported similar polybenzoxazine/PUs. For
example, Td5 changed from 285 ꢀC for poly(I-40) copolymer of
8.6 wt.% benzoxazine weight percent to 300 ꢀC for poly(I-10)
copolymer of 46.8 wt.%, respectively. The char yield also showed
significant increase upon increasing the benzoxazine content in the
main-chain. For example samples poly(I-0), poly(I-10), poly(I-20),
poly(I-30) and poly(I-40) have char yield of ca. 53.0, 44.3, 35.0, 28.0
and 18.0%, respectively. Thus, this new concept of crosslinked poly
(benzoxazine-co-urethane) copolymer is shown to be effective for
producing polybenzoxazine/PU materials of significant higher
thermal stability than the previously reported approaches. For
example, sample poly(I-20) of ca. 70 wt.% of PU has char yield of
35.0%, whereas the previously reported polybenzoxazine/PU
materials of similar PU content showed a char yield in the range of
22-25% [27,28,36] and not more than 30% for systems of ca. 30 wt.%
of PU [32,33]. This enhancement in thermal stability is attributed to
the presence of polybenzoxazine as a part of the copolymer main-
chain and the thermal stability of urethane linkage that result in
better thermal properties than the reported polybenzoxazine/PU
materials.
ꢂ One-pot synthesis of phenolic-urethane materials that avoids
the drawbacks associated with the use of preformed NCO-
terminated PU prepolymers.
ꢂ Superior thermal stability compared to previous approaches.
ꢂ Excellent mechanical integrity as can be seen from high tensile
modulus and tensile strength due to the presence of poly-
benzoxazine as part of the main-chain.
ꢂ These copolymers showed thermal and mechanical properties
that are comparable to the well-known high performance poly
(urethane-imide).
Acknowledgement
We thank the Ministry of Education of Libya for the financial
support of M. Baqar. We also thank Mr. Saeed Alhassan, Case
Western Reserve University, for his kind help in taking AFM images.
References
[1] Król P. Linear polyurethanes synthesis methods, chemical structures, prop-
erties and applications. Boston: VSP; 2008.
[2] Kumar MNS, Manjula KS, Siddaramaiah A. J Appl Polym Sci 2007;105:3153e61.
[3] Benes H, Rosner J, Holler P, Synkova H, Kotek J, Horak Z. Polym Adv Technol
2007;18:149e56.
[4] Oertel G, editor. Polyurethane handbook. Munich: Hanser; 1985.
[5] Takeichi T, Ujiie K, Inoue K. Polymer 2005;46:11225e31.
[6] Zuo M, Takeichi T. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 1997;35:3745e53.
[7] Zuo M, Xiang Q, Takeichi T. Polymer 1998;39:6883e9.
[8] Yeganeh H, Mehdipour-Ataei S, Ghaffari M. High Perform Polym 2008;20:
126e45.
[9] Jaisankar SN, Nelson DJ, Brammer CN. Polymer 2009;50:4775e80.
[10] Harjunalanen T, Lahtinen M. Eur Polym J 2003;39:817e24.
[11] Petrini P, Tanzi MC, Moran CR, Graham NB.
J Mater Sci Mater Med
1999;10:635e9.
[12] Ashraf SM, Ahmad S, Riaz U. Polym Int 2007;56:1173e81.
[13] Ho TH, Wang CS. Polymer 1996;37:2733e42.
[14] Rubner MF. Macromolecules 1986;19:2119e28.
[15] Yagci Y, Kiskan B, Ghosh NN. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 2009;47:
5565e76.
[16] Ghosh N, Kiskan B, Yagci Y. Prog Polym Sci 2007;32:1344e91.
[17] Liu X, Gu Y. J Appl Polym Sci 2002;84:1107e13.
[18] Agag T, Arza CR, Maurer FHJ, Ishida H. Macromolecules 2010;43:2748e58.
[19] Ishida H, Low HY. Macromolecules 1997;30:1099e106.
[20] Wang CF, Su YC, Kuo SW, Huang CF, Sheen YC, Chang FC. Angew Chem Int Ed
2006;45:2248e51.
[21] Agag T, Takeichi T. High Perform Polym 2002;14:115e32.
[22] Sudo A, Kudoh R, Nakayama H, Arima K, Endo T. Macromolecules 2008;41:
9030e4.
[23] Kim HD, Ishida H. Macromolecules 2003;36:8320e9.
[24] Andreu R, Reina JA, Ronda JC. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 2008;46:3353e66.
[25] Agag T, Takeichi T. Macromolecules 2001;34:7257e63.
[26] Dunkers J, Ishida H. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 1999;37:1913e21.
[27] Takeichi T, Guo Y, Agag T. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 2000;38:4165e76.
[28] Takeichi T, Guo Y. J Appl Polym Sci 2003;90:4075e83.
[29] Takeichi T, Guo Y. Polym J 2001;33:437e43.
[30] Cui Y, Chen Y, Wang X, Tian G, Tang X. Polym Int 2003;52:1246e8.
[31] Rimdusit S, Pirstpindvong S, Tanthapanichakoon W, Damrongsakkul S. Polym
Eng Sci 2005;45:288e96.