synthesis of fused heterocyclic compounds employing this
metal-free strategy.7-9 However, compared with the glori-
ous achievements in the cascade reactions employing
proline-derived catalysts, the cascade methodology of R,β-
unsaturated ketones catalyzed by primary amine cata-
lysts still represents a great challenge for chemists.10
We have been interested in the activation of R,β-unsatu-
rated ketones and achieved great success in the asymmetric
Michael additions of different nucleophiles to R,β-unsatu-
rated ketones under multifunctional catalysis.11 We have
also made great efforts in the exploitation of cascade
reactions from which complex compounds could be af-
forded in a highly stereoselective manner and a simple one-
pot operation. In this letter, we report a one-pot cascade
procedure for the synthesis of a series of enantio- and di-
astereoenriched oxazine and oxazolidine derivatives based
on the rational design of bifunctional nucleophiles and the
activation of vinyl ketones. Notably, a chiral quaternary
carbon center with satisfactory selectivities has been con-
structed in the final annulation step by using a simple
Brønsted acid.
Table 1. Screening of the Reaction Conditions for the First Step
of the Tandem Reactiona
The rationally designed nucleophilic reagent 1a was
selected as the Michael donor to participate in the cascade
reaction with 4-phenylbut-3-en-2-one 2a under several
different conditions to form the desired oxazolidine deriva-
tive 3a. Based on the former studies8,9 we assumed that the
enantiopurity of the final product would be dominantly
determined by the first step of the cascade procedure.
Thus the reaction conditions for the Michael addition were
first investigated to optimize the enantioselectivity of the
cascade reaction (Table 1). Poor enantioselectivity was
obtained using the diamine catalysts 5 and 6 (entries 1 to
2). Moderate stereoselectivity could be acquired using the
famous catalyst 9-amino (9-deoxy) epiquinine 7 (entry 3).
When the thiourea motif was imported, great improvement
entry
cat.
solvent
CH2Cl2
t (h)b
conv %c
ee %d
dre
1
5
48
48
89
51
30
35
-51
85
--
4:1
4:1
4:1
4:1
--
2
6
CH2Cl2
3
7
CH2Cl2
48
80
4
8a
8b
9
CH2Cl2
48
70
5
CH2Cl2
48
0
6
CH2Cl2
24
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
64
86
77
91
89
91
92
94
95
94
94
4:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
9:1k
7
9
Toluene
24
8
9
1,4-dioxane
THF
24
9
9
24
10
11
12
13
14
15
9f
9g
9g
9g
9g
9g
1,4-dioxane
1,4-dioxane
1,4-dioxaneh
1,4-dioxanei
1,4-dioxanej
1,4-dioxanek
24
24
72
144
144
72
50
>95
(6) For some very recent examples, see: (a) Jiang, K.; Jia; Yin, Z. X.;
Wu, L.; Chen, Y. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2766. (b) Tan, B.; Zhu, D.; Zhang,
L.; Chua, P. J.; Zeng, X.; Zhong, G. Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16, 3842.
(c) Li, J.; Zhou, S.; Han, B.; Wu, L.; Chen, Y. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46,
2665. (d) Rendler, S.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132,
5027. (e) Enders, D.; Wang, C.; Mukanova, M.; Greb, A. Chem.
Commun. 2010, 46, 2447.
(7) For some selected recent examples of organocatalytic cascade
reactions, see: (a) Zhu, D.; Lu, M.; Dai, L.; Zhong, G. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6089. (b) Tan, B.; Shi, Z.; Chua, P. J.; Li, Y.; Zhong, G.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 758. (c) Jiang, H.; Elsner, P.; Jensen,
K. L.; Falcicchio, A.; Marcos, V.; Jøgensen, K. A. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2009, 48, 6844. (d) Cai, Q.; Zhao, Z.; You, S.-L. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2009, 48, 7428. (e) Wang, Y.; Yu, D.; Liu, Y.; Wei, H.; Luo, Y.;
Dixon, D. J.; Xu, P. Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16, 3922.
a Unless otherwise noticed, all reactions were carried out using 1.0
equiv of 1a (0.10 mmol), 1.5 equiv of 2a, 0.1 equiv of catalyst, 0.2 mL of
solvent, and 1.5 equiv of HBr in water (40%). b t represented the reaction
time of the first step of the tandem reaction. c The conversion of the
Michael addition which was determined by 1H NMR on the crude
reaction mixture after the certain time given. d Enantiomeric excess of 3a,
determined by chiral HPLC. e Determined by 1H NMR on the crude
reaction mixture 12 h after adding 1.5 equiv of HBr aq into the isolated
intermediate (0.25 M). f 5.0 mol % catalyst was used. g 2.0 mol % catalyst
was used. h The Michael addition was carried out at 0.2 M using 0.5 mL
i
of 1,4-dioxane. The Michael addition was carried out at 0.1 M using
1.0 mL of 1,4-dioxane. j The Michael addition was carried out at 0.067 M
using 1.5 mL of 1,4-dioxane. k The annulation step was carried out at
0.067 M using 6 mL of CH2Cl2 under 0 °C.
ꢀ
(8) (a) Franzen, J.; Fisher, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 787.
ꢀ
(b) Zhang, W.; Franzen, J. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 499.
(9) Wu, X.; Dai, X.; Nie, L.; Fang, H.; Chen, J.; Ren, Z.; Cao, W.;
in the ee value was implemented using catalyst 8a, with70%
conversion within 48 h (entry 4). However, no reaction
occurred when the primary amine was protected (entry 5).
Finally, when the multifunctional catalyst 9 was employed
both the reaction rate and ee value were acceptable (entry 6).
After the screening of different solvents, 1,4-dioxane ap-
peared to be the most suitable reaction media for the
Michael addition (entry 8).12 Further optimizations of the
Zhao, G. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 2733.
(10) (a) Wu, L.-Y.; Bencivenni, G.; Mancinelli, M.; Mazzanti, A.;
Bartoli, G.; Melchiorre, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 7196.
(b) Bencivenni, G.; Wu, L.-Y.; Mazzanti, A.; Giannichi, B.; Pesciaioli,
F.; Song, M.-P.; Bartoli, G.; Melchiorre, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009,
48, 7200.
(11) (a) Li, P.; Wang, Y.; Liang, X.; Ye, J. Chem. Commun. 2008,
3302. (b) Li, P.; Wen, S.; Yu, F.; Liu, Q.; Li, W.; Wang, Y.; Liang, X.; Ye, J.
Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 753. (c) Wen, S.; Li, P.; Wu, H.; Yu, F.; Liang, X.;
Ye, J. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 4806. (d) Zhou, Y.; Li, X.; Li, W.; Wu,
W.; Liang, X.; Ye, J. Synlett 2010, 15, 2357. (e) Huang, H.; Yu, F.; Jin,
Z.; Li, W.; Wu, W.; Liang, X.; Ye, J. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 5957.
(f) Yang, J.; Li, W.; Jin, Z.; Liang, X.; Ye, J. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 5218.
(12) For more details, see Supporting Information.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 4, 2011
565