In summary, we have found the enantioselective pro-
pargylic alkylation of propargylic esters with aldehydes
in the presence of a copper complex bearing racemic
BINAP and an optically active secondary amine as
cocatalysts to give the corresponding propargylic alky-
lated products in good yields as a mixture of two
diastereoisomers with a high enantioselectivity (up to
99% ee). This catalytic reaction is considered to provide
a new type of enantioselective propargylic substitu-
tion reaction,16 where the enamines generated in situ
from aldehydes enantioselectively attack the copper-
allenylidene complexes. In the present reaction system,
both the transition metal catalyst (copper complex) and
organocatalyst (secondary amine) activate propargylic
esters and aldehydes, respectively, and both catalysts
cooperatively and simultaneously work to promote the
propargylic alkylation enantioselectively. We believe
that the finding described here will open up a new aspect
of not only dual catalytic reactions using both organo-
catalysts and transition metal catalysts but also the
enantioselective R-alkylation of aldehydes.17,18 Further
work is currently in progress to apply this strategy to
other reaction systems and to clarify the scope and
limitations of the present propargylic alkylation.
Scheme 4
by the reaction of propargylic ester 1 with the copper
complex via an alkyne complex (A). Subsequent attack
of an enamine (E) generated in situ from aldehyde 2 and
amine 3aupon the γ-carbon of B results inthe formation of
another alkyne complex (D) via an acetylide complex (C).
Then, the alkylated product 4 is formed from D by ligand
exchange with another propargylic ester 1. In fact, we
confirmed that no reaction occurred at all when reactions
of propargylic esters bearing an internal alkyne moiety
were carried out under the same reaction conditions. These
results clearly indicate that this propargylic alkylation
proceeded via copper-allenylidene complexes as key and
reactive intermediates.5
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by a Grant-
in-Aid for Scientific Research for Young Scientists (S) (No.
19675002) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports,
Science and Technology, Japan. M.I. acknowledges the
Global COE program for Chemistry Innovation. Y.N.
thanks the Ube Industries LTD.
Supporting Information Available. Experimental pro-
cedures and spectroscopic data. This material is available
To obtain some information on the enantioselective
propargylic alkylation, the stereochemistry of the product
syn-5a was compared with that of the propargylic alkylated
product which were previously obtained from the reaction of
1-(1-naphthyl)-2-propyn-1-ol with 2a.1 This result indicates
that the absolute configuration of syn-5a is [(2R,3S)]. The
information on the stereochemistry of the propargylic alky-
lated products supports that the asymmetric induction of the
propargylic alkylation catalyzed by the copper complex was
achieved in a similar manner as that by the ruthenium
complex, which was proposed in the previous paper.1 Thus,
for the formation of major products syn-5, enamine, gener-
ated from chiral amine and aldehyde, attacks from the Si-face
of enamine upon the Re-face of the copper-allenylidene
complex leading to the carbon-carbon bond formation.
(16) For recent reviews, see: (a) Nishibayashi, Y.; Uemura, S. Curr.
Org. Chem. 2006, 10, 135. (b) Nishibayashi, Y.; Uemura, S. Comprehensive
Organometallic Chemistry III, Vol. 11; Crabtree, R. H., Mingos, D. M. P.,
Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2007; p 123. (c) Kabalka, G. W.; Yao, M.-L.
Curr. Org. Synth. 2008, 5, 28. (d) Ljungdahl, N.; Kann, N. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 642. (e) Miyake, Y.; Uemura, S.; Nishibayashi, Y.
ChemCatChem 2009, 1, 342. (f) Detz, R. J.; Hiemstra, H.; van Maarseveen,
J. H. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 6263.
(17) For a recent review, see: Alba, A.-N.; Viciano, M.; Rios, M.
ChemCatChem 2009, 1, 437.
(18) For recent examples, see: (a) Nicewicz, D. A.; MacMillan,
D. W. C. Science 2008, 322, 77. (b) Shaikh, R. R.; Mazzanti, A.; Petrini,
M.; Bartoli, G.; Melchiorre, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 8707. (c)
Cozzi, P. G.; Benfatti, F.; Zoli, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 1313. (d)
Belot, S.; Massaro, A.; Tenti, A.; Mordini, A.; Alexakis, A. Org. Lett. 2008,
10, 4557. (e) Wu, J.; Ni, B.; Headley, A. D. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 3354. (f)
Itoh, T.; Ishikawa, H.; Hayashi, Y. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 3854. (g) Yang, H.;
Carter, R. G. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 2246. (h) Laars, M.; Ausmees, K.;
Uudsemaa, M.; Tamm, T.; Kanger, T.; Lopp, M. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74,
3772. (i) Zheng, Z.; Perkins, B. L.; Ni, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132,
50. (j) Quintard, A.; Belot, S.; Marchal, E.; Alexakis, A. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2010, 927. (k) Xiao, J.; Xu, F.-X.; Lu, Y.-P.; Loh, T.-P. Org. Lett.
2010, 12, 1220. (l) Galzerano, P.; Agostino, D.; Bencivenni, G.; Sambri,
L.; Bartoli, G.; Melchiorre, P. Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16, 6069. (m)
Capdevila, M. G.; Benfatti, F.; Zoli, L.; Stenta, M.; Cozzi, P. G.
Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16, 11237. (n) Ishikawa, H.; Suzuki, T.; Orita,
H.; Uchimaru, T.; Hayashi, Y. Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16, 12616. (o)
Husmann, R.; Jcrres, M.; Raabe, G.; Bolm, C. Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16,
12549. (p) Kang, Y. K.; Kim, S. M.; Kim, D. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010,
132, 11847. (q) Shih, H.-W.; Wal, M. N. V.; Grange, R. L.; MacMillan,
D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 13600.
(15) (a) Preliminary results are as follows: For 1e, 27% yield (4.5 h),
syn-isomer/anti-isomer = 1.8/1, 97% ee (syn-isomer) and 96% ee (anti-
isomer). For 1f, 20% yield (4 h), syn-isomer/anti-isomer = 1.7/1, 98% ee
(syn-isomer) and 95% ee (anti-isomer). (b) Unfortunately, some other
propargylic esters bearing an electron-rich aromatic moiety at the
propargylic position such as 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-propynyl (1j) and
1-(4-methoxynaphthyl)-2-propynyl (1k) 2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorobenzoates
could not be prepared from the corresponding propargylic alcohols due
to the instability of the pentafluorobenzoate esters (not shown).
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 4, 2011
595