(c) H. Pellissier, Tetrahedron, 2007, 63, 9267–9331; (d) M. J. Gaunt,
C. C. C. Johansson, A. McNally and N. T. Vo, Drug Discovery
Today, 2007, 12, 8–27; (e) A. Dondoni and A. Massi, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 4638–4660; (f) D. W. C. MacMillan,
Nature, 2008, 455, 304–308; (g) S. Bertelsen and K. A. Jøgensen,
Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 2178–2189.
2 For recent reviews on hydrogen bond activation, see:
(a) P. I. Dalko, Hydrogen Bonding in Organic Synthesis,
Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2009; (b) S. J. Connon, Chem.–Eur. J.,
2006, 12, 5418–5427; (c) M. S. Taylor and E. N. Jacobsen, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 1520–1543; (d) T. Akiyama, J. Itoh and
K. Fuchibe, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2006, 348, 999–1010;
(e) A. G. Doyle and E. N. Jacobsen, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107,
5713–5743; (f) X. H. Yu and W. Wang, Chem.–Asian J., 2008, 3,
516–532; (g) Z. G. Zhang and P. R. Schreiner, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
2009, 38, 1187–1198; (h) D. Leow and C.-H. Tan, Chem.–Asian J.,
2009, 4, 488–507; (i) S. J. Connon, Synlett, 2009, 354–376;
(j) Y. Sohtome and K. Nagasawa, Synlett, 2009, 1–22;
(k) D. Leow and C.-H. Tan, Synlett, 2010, 1589–1605;
(l) M. Zeng and S.-L. You, Synlett, 2010, 1289–1301;
(m) M. Terada, Synthesis, 2010, 1929–1982; (n) Y. Takemoto,
Chem. Pharm. Bull., 2010, 58, 593–601.
3 J. P. Malerich, K. Hagihara and V. H. Rawal, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2008, 130, 14416–14417.
4 (a) Y. Zhu, J. P. Malerich and V. H. Rawal, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2010, 49, 153–156; (b) D.-Q. Xu, Y.-F. Wang, W. Zhang,
S.-P. Luo, A.-G. Zhong, A.-B. Xia and Z.-Y. Xu, Chem.–Eur. J.,
2010, 16, 4177–4180.
5 Y. Qian, G.-Y. Ma, A.-F. Lv, H.-J. Zhu, J. Zhao and V. H. Rawal,
Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 3004–3006.
6 H. Konishi, T. Y. Lam, J. P. Malerich and V. H. Rawal, Org. Lett.,
2010, 12, 2028–2031.
Scheme 2 Proposed transition state.
o-formyl-enones 4h, 4k and 4l, the cyclic products were
achieved in excellent yields (91–99%) by increasing the catalyst
loading from 3 to 10 mol% (Table 3, entries 9, 13 and 15).
The absolute configuration of the intramolecular MBH
products was assigned as (S) by comparing the optical rotation
value with those reported in the literature.10b A possible
mechanism for the chiral phosphine-squaramide-catalyzed
intramolecular MBH reaction is proposed in Scheme 2. The
nucleophilic phosphine attacks the b-position of the Michael
acceptor to generate an enolate, and the electrophilic squaramide
activates the aldehyde moiety of substrates 4 by forming a
hydrogen bond with the oxygen atom of the carbonyl. Then,
the chiral cyclohexyl scaffold forces the phosphinoyl-associated
enolate to attack the activated carbonyl from the si-face to
generate the product with an (S)-configuration.10d,e
7 J. W. Lee, T. H. Ryu, J. S. Oh, H. Y. Bae, H. B. Jang and
C. E. Song, Chem. Commun., 2009, 7224–7226.
8 For a recent review, see: A. Marinetti and A. Voituriez, Synlett,
2009, 174–194.
In summary, we have developed a new class of bifunctional
squaramide-based organocatalyst that show a high catalytic
activity and a good-to-excellent enantioselectivity in the
asymmetric intramolecular MBH reactions of o-formyl-enones,
affording a variety of cyclic hydroxyl enones. Work is now
actively under way to expand the use of these bifunctional
phosphine-squaramide organocatalysts to other valuable
transformations.
9 For reviews on asymmetric MBH reactions, see: (a) G. Masson,
C. Housseman and J. Zhu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46,
4614–4628; (b) D. Basavaiah, K. V. Rao and R. J. Reddy, Chem.
Soc. Rev., 2007, 36, 1581–1588; (c) P. R. Krishna, R. Sachwani and
P. S. Reddy, Synlett, 2008, 2897–2912; (d) V. Carrasco-Sanchez,
M. J. Simirgiotis and L. S. Santos, Molecules, 2009, 14,
3989–4021; (e) Y. Wei and M. Shi, Acc. Chem. Res., 2010, 43,
1005–1018.
10 For enantioselective intramolecular MBH reactions, see:
(a) S.-H. Chen, B.-C. Hong, C.-F. Su and S. Sarshar, Tetrahedron
Lett., 2005, 46, 8899–8903; (b) C. E. Aroyan, M. M. Vasbinder and
S. J. Miller, Org. Lett., 2005, 7, 3849–3851; (c) F. Seidel and
J. A. Gladysz, Synlett, 2007, 986–988; (d) J.-J. Gong, K. Yuan,
H.-L. Song and X.-Y. Wu, Tetrahedron, 2010, 66, 2439–2443;
(e) K. Yuan, H.-L. Song, Y. Hu, J.-F. Fang and X.-Y. Wu,
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2010, 21, 903–908.
We are grateful for financial support from the National
Natural Science Foundation of China (20772029), the Program
for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-07-
0286) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central
Universities. We are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers
of this article for their valuable suggestions.
Notes and references
11 (a) A. Caiazzo, S. Dalili and A. K. Yudin, Org. Lett., 2002, 4,
2597–2600; (b) Y.-Q. Fang and E. N. Jacobsen, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2008, 130, 5660–5661; (c) K. Yuan, L. Zhang, H.-L. Song, Y. Hu
and X.-Y. Wu, Tetrahedron Lett., 2008, 49, 6262–6264.
12 For the preparation of phosphine-squaramides 3a–c, see the ESIw.
1 For recent reviews on asymmetric organocatalysis, see:
(a) P. I. Dalko, Enantioselective Organocatalysis: Reactions and
Experimental Procedures, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2007; (b) B. List,
Asymmetric Organocatalysis, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2010;
c
1014 Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 1012–1014
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011