Scheme 1. “One-Pot” Route to 7-Aryl THXs using Tandem
Catalysis
Miyaura-Suzuki cross-coupling with boronic acid 3 using
the same Pd catalyst (Scheme 1).
In this way, libraries of simple, “drug-like” 7-arylated
THXs could be produced in a single operation through
application of tandem catalysis.9-11 In this communica-
tion, we successfully demonstrate the feasibility of this
approach to 7-substituted THXs. Moreover, using one of
the derived synthetic compounds, we confirm that this
heterocyclic scaffold is indeed responsible, at least in part,
for the bioactivity of one of these complex polyketide
derived NPs.
To ascertain if THXs could be made by Pd catalyzed
C-O bond construction, 2-(2-bromo-benzoyl)-cyclohex-
anone (4a) was synthesized in 65% yield in a single opera-
tion by deprotonation of cyclohexanone with LDA fol-
lowed by C-acylation of the resulting lithium enolate with
2-bromobenzoyl chloride (Table 1).12 The corresponding
chloride and iodide basedsubstrates 4band 4crespectively,
were made in the same way using the appropriate acid
chlorides. Next, we investigated a range of catalytic con-
ditions for ring closure to the THX nucleus.
Figure 1. Bioactive polyketide derived natural products con-
taining the 7-aryl tetrahydroxanthone (THX) nucleus.
nature to prevent facile aromatization to the corresponding
xanthones through elimination of water.7 In considering
possible routes to these molecules, we were drawn to the
ideaof using palladium catalysis toconstruct the THX ring
through selective C-O bond construction using the enolate
derived from a bromoketone such as 2.8 Importantly, by
careful orchestration of the reaction conditions, introduc-
tion of the 7-substituent might be realized concurrently by
(2) (a) Kunimoto, S.; Lu, J.; Esumi, H.; Yamazaki, Y.; Kinoshita, N.;
Honma, Y.; Hamada, M.; Ohsono, M.; Ishizuka, M.; Takeuchi, T.
J. Antibiot. 2003, 56, 1004. (b) Kunimoto, S.; Someno, T.; Yamazaki, Y.;
Lu, J.; Esumi, H.; Naganawa, H. J. Antibiot. 2003, 56, 1012. (c) Lu, J.;
Kunimoto, S.; Yamazaki, Y.; Kaminishi, M.; Esumi, H. Cancer Sci.
2004, 95, 547. (d) Someno, T.; Kunimoto, S.; Nakamura, H.; Naganawa,
H.; Ikeda, D. J. Antibiot. 2005, 58, 56. (e) Masuda, T.; Ohba, S.;
Kawada, M.; Ohsono, M.; Ikeda, D.; Esumi, H.; Kunimoto, S.
J. Antibiot. 2006, 59, 209.
(3) Ratnayake, R.; Lacey, E.; Tennant, S.; Gill, J. H.; Capon, R. J.
Chem.;Eur. J. 2007, 13, 1610.
(4) Koizumi, Y.; Tomoda, H.; Kumagai, A.; Zhou, X.-P.; Koyota, S.;
Sugiyama, T. Cancer. Sci. 2009, 100, 322.
(5) Du, X.-G.; Wang, W.; Zhang, S.-P.; Pu, X.-P.; Zhang, Q.-Y.; Ye,
M.; Zhao, Y.-Y.; Wang, B.-R.; Khan, I. A.; Guo, D.-A. J. Nat. Prod.
2010, 73, 1422.
Encouragingly, subjection of 4a to Pd2(dba)3, Xantphos
and Cs2CO3 in refluxing toluene furnished 5 in 76% yield
(Table 1, entry 1), whose spectroscopic data matched those
previously reported.7a,13 Further improvements were
achieved by screening a variety of phosphine ligands and
solvents (Table 1, entries 2-10). The use of Xphos as ligand
and dioxane as solvent proved most effective with 5 pro-
duced in an excellent 93% yield (Table 1, entry 10). The
cyclization proceeded with similar efficiency when the bro-
mide was replaced with a chloride, although appreciably
lower yields were observed using the corresponding iodide
(Table 1, entries 11-12).
The scope of this new route to THXs was investigated
through the preparation of derivatives 6a-i (Figure 2). In
most cases, the reactions were conducted using bromide
based substrates although for the preparation of 6h, the
corresponding chloride was used. Using the optimized
conditions, good to excellent yields were observed and a
variety of groups shown to be tolerated including acid
sensitive functional groups (e.g., 6c). The formation of
(6) The numbering system adopted is based on that of the parent
heterocycle, namely 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-9H-xanthen-9-one.
(7) Existing routes to THXs rely on the use of strong acids, see: (a)
Watanbe, T.; Katayama, S.; Nakashita, Y.; Yamauchi, M. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1978, 726. (b) Singh, O. V; Kapil, R. S; Garg, C. P;
Kapoor, R. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 5619. (c) Kostakis, I. K.;
Tenta, R.; Pouli, N.; Marakos, P.; Skaltsounis, A.-L; Pratsinis, H.;
Kletsas, D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 5057.
(8) For the synthesis of benzofurans using C-O bond formation, see:
(a) Willis, M. C.; Taylor, D.; Gillmore, A. T. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 4755. (b)
Willis, M. C.; Taylor, D.; Gillmore, A. T. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 11513.
(9) For a monograph, see: Tietze, L. F.; Brasche, G.; Gericke, K.
Domino Reactions in Organic Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2006.
(10) For reviews, see: Bonne, D.; Coquerel, Y.; Constantieux, T.;
Rodriguez, J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2010, 21, 1085. Barluenga, J.;
Rodriguez, F.; Fananas, F. J. Chem. Asian. J. 2009, 4, 1036. D’Souza,
D. M.; Muller, T. J. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 1095. Chapman, C. J.;
Frost, C. G. Synthesis 2007, 1. Ajamian, A.; Gleason, J. L. Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3754.
(11) For recent examples, see: Bryan, C. S; Braunger, J. A; Lautens,
M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 7064. Wu, X.-F; Neumann, H.;
Beller, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 5284. Gandeepan, P.;
Parthasarathy, K.; Cheng, C.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 8569.
Kim, H.; Lee, K.; Kim, S.; Lee, P. H. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 6341.
Spergel, S. H.; Okoro, D. R.; Pitts, W. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 5316.
Bararjanian, M.; Balalaie, S.; Rominger, F.; Movassagh, B.; Bijanzadeh,
H. R. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 2806.
(12) Although drawn as 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds, the substrates
used in this study exist predominantly in the enol form in CDCl3, as
determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy (see Supporting Information).
ꢀ
ꢀ
(13) Patonay, T.; Levai, A.; Rimanm, E.; Varma, R. S. Arkivoc 2004,
183.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 5, 2011
1057