50
V.A. Petrov, W. Marshall / Journal of Fluorine Chemistry 132 (2011) 41–51
A sample of crude 7 was left at ambient temperature and after
0.035 mol) was added slowly at 25–30 8C. The orange-brown
reaction mixture was agitated for 2 h at 25 8C and the epoxide 2
(6.3 g, 0.035 mol) was added drop wise at 25–30 8C (slightly
exothermic). The reaction mixture was agitated for 16 h at ambient
temperature, diluted with water (200 mL), extracted with hexane
(3Â 50 mL). Combined organic layer was washed with water, dried
over MgSO4 and solvent was removed under vacuum. The residue
was distilled under reduce pressure to give compound 25a or 26a
(purity 97–98%). Data for compounds 25a, 26a are given in Tables 1
and 2.
ꢀ6 months the formation of crystalline solid (needles) was
observed in the sample. Crystals were filtered and identified as
compound 7a by single crystal X-ray diffraction.
4.9. Preparation of compounds 9, 10 and 11
Compound 2 (12 g, 0.11 mol) was slowly added to an agitated
solution of thiourea (8, 7.6 g, 0.1 mol) in 100 mL of dry THF, at a
rate that maintained internal temperature at 25–28 8C. The
reaction mixture was agitated at 25 8C for 2 h and the solvent
was removed under vacuum to leave 26 g of white solid material,
identified as 9.
4.13. Preparation of compounds 27 and 28 (typical procedure)
To a solution of 5 g of t-BuOK in 30 mL of dry DMF was added a
solution of 9 (5 g in 20 mL of DMF) at 5–10 8C. The reaction mixture
was warmed to 25 8C (ꢀ1 h) and diluted with 300 mL of saturated
aqueous solution of NH4Cl. Precipitated organic layer was
separated, washed with water (3Â 30 mL), dried over MgSO4
and identified as thiol 9 (NMR spectroscopy).
The reaction of 9 with t-BuOK was run as described above (same
scale), but after the addition of the solution of t-BuOK in DMF, the
reaction mixture was agitated at 25 8C for 1 h, and then 13 g of
C3F13I was added. The agitation was continued for another 6 h at
60 8C. The reaction mixture was diluted with 300 mL of 10%
hydrochloric acid, extracted by hexane (3Â 50 mL), combined
extract was washed with water (2Â 100 mL), dried over MgSO4 and
the solvent was removed under vacuum. The residue (10 g) was
distilled under reduced pressure to give 6 g of compound 11, b.p.
95–97 8C/0.5 mm Hg. Data for compound 9, 10 and 11 are given in
Tables 1 and 2.
The epoxide 1 or 2 or (0.05–0.1 mol) was added slowly at 25–
30 8C to agitated mixture of CS2 (4.0–7.5 mL, 0.05–0.1 mol) and
0.1–0.3 g of Bu4N+FÀÁH2O catalyst and dry THF (50–100 mL). The
reaction mixture was agitated at 25 8C for 4–16 h and the solvent
was removed under reduced pressure. The residue was distilled
under vacuum to give compound 27 or 28 (purity >98%). Data for
both compounds are given in Tables 1 and 2.
Acknowledgements
PVA thanks Dr. A. Sievert (DuPont FLPR) for sample of epoxide 2,
reviewers for helpful suggestions and Timothy Bentz for technical
assistance.
References
[1] T. Katagiri, K. Uneyama, J. Fluorine Chem. 105 (2000) 285–293.
[2] I.-S. Chang, C.J. Willis, Can. J. Chem. 55 (1977) 2465–2472.
[3] W.B. Farnham, US 2008248418, 2008.
4.10. Preparation of compounds 17–21 (typical procedure)
[4] V.A. Petrov, J. Fluorine Chem. 125 (2004) 531–536.
[5] V.A. Petrov, Synthesis (2002) 2225–2231.
To an agitated solution of 0.1 mol of substrate 12,13,14,15 or 16 in
100 mL of dry THF (placed in the flask equipped with thermocouple,
dry-ice condenser and addition funnel), the epoxide 2 (20 g, 0.11 mol)
was added slowly at 25–30 8C (mildly exothermic). The reaction
mixture was agitated at ambient temperature for 4–16 h and the
solvent was removed under vacuum to leave products 17–21 (typical
purity 97–98%, NMR). Small samples for melting point measurement
were prepared by crystallization of crude material from hexane. Data
for compound 17–21 are given in Tables 1 and 2.
[6] E. Sergeeva, J. Kopilov, I. Goldberg, M. Kol, Inorg. Chem. 48 (2009) 8075–8077.
[7] G.K.S. Prakash, P.J. Linares-Palomino, K. Glinton, S. Chacko, G. Rasul, T. Mathew,
G.A. Olah, Synlett (2007) 1158–1162.
[8] V.A. Petrov, A.E. Feiring, J. Feldman, E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., US Pat.
6653419, 2000.
[9] V.A. Petrov, S. Peng, Y. Brun, Abstracts of Fluoropolymer 2008 Conference,
Charleston, 2008, Lecture 4.
[10] Q.-C. Mir, J.n.M. Shreeve, Inorg. Chem. 19 (1980) 1510–1514.
[11] J.-P. Begue, D. Bonnet-Delpon, B. Crousse, Synlett (2004) 18–29.
[12] V. Kesavan, D. Bonnet-Delpon, J.-P. Begue, Tetrahedron Lett. 41 (2000) 2895–
2898.
[13] W.J. Middleton, W.H. Sharkey, J. Org. Chem. 30 (1965) 1384–1390.
[14] T. Eicher, S. Hauptmann, The Chemistry of Heterocycles, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim,
Germany, 2003, p. 25.
[15] C.C. Price, P.F. Kirk, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 75 (1953) 2396–2400.
[16] G. Aghapour, R. Hatefipour, Synth. Commun. 39 (2009) 1698–1707.
[17] J.F. Berrien, M. Ourevitch, G. Morgant, N.E. Ghermani, B. Crousse, D. Bonnet-
Delpon, J. Fluorine Chem. 128 (2007) 839–843.
[18] T. Katagiri, Y. Fujiwara, S. Takahashi, K. Uneyama, J. Fluorine Chem. 126 (2005)
1134–1139.
[19] A. Herrera, R. Martinez-Alvarez, P. Ramiro, M. Chioua, R. Chioua, Synthesis (2004)
503–505.
[20] E. Lieber, C.N.R. Rao, J. Ramachandran, Spectrochim. Acta 13 (1959) 296–299.
[21] J.A. Kargol, R.W. Crecely, J.L. Burmeister, Inorg. Chim. Acta 25 (1977) L109–L110.
[22] J.A. Kargol, R.W. Crecely, J.L. Burmeister, Inorg. Chem. 18 (1979) 2532–2535.
[23] I.L. Knunyants, V.V. Shokina, I.V. Galakhov, Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin. (1966) 873–
878.
[24] L.V. Saloutina, A.Y. Zapevalov, M.I. Kodess, V.I. Saloutin, G.G. Aleksandrov, O.N.
Chupakhin, Russ. J. Org. Chem. 36 (2000) 887–898.
[25] L.V. Saloutina, A.Y. Zapevalov, M.I. Kodess, V.I. Saloutin, G.G. Aleksandrov, O.N.
Chupakhin, J. Fluorine Chem. 104 (2000) 155–165.
4.11. Preparation of compounds 22a, 23a, b, 24a, b (typical
procedure)
To a mixture of 0.2–0.5 g of catalysts (Bu4N+FÀÁH2O was used for
the preparation of 22a, 23b, 24b and CsF for synthesis of 23a and
24a) and arylisothiocyanate (0.02 mol) in 50 mL THF (for reaction
of 22, 23, 24 with the epoxides 1, 2) or 50 mL CH3CN (preparation
of 23a) the epoxide 2 or 1 (0.025 mol) was added slowly. The
reactions involving more reactive 2 were exothermic, the epoxide
addition was carried out at 25–30 8C and they typically were
completed within 2–24 h. The reactions involving less reactive 1
require 4–7 days at 25 8C for completion (monitored by GC). After
the conversion of epoxide reached >90%, the reaction mixture was
diluted with water, extracted with hexane (3Â 50 mL), hexane
layer was dried over MgSO4 and the solvent was removed under
reduced pressure to leave crude crystalline material or oil. Pure
samples were obtained by crystallization from hexane. Data for
compounds 22a, 23a, b, 24a, b are given in Tables 1 and 2.
[26] L.V. Saloutina, A.Y. Zapevalov, M.I. Kodess, V.I. Saloutin, O.N. Chupakhin, Mende-
leev Commun. (1999) 231–232.
[27] L.V. Saloutina, A.Y. Zapevalov, V.I. Saloutin, M.I. Kodess, V.E. Kirichenko, M.G.
Pervova, O.N. Chupakhin, Russ. J. Org. Chem. 42 (2006) 1307–1312.
[28] V.N. Boiko, G.M. Shchupak, J. Fluorine Chem. 69 (1994) 207–212.
[29] G.G. Furin, Zh. Org. Khim. 31 (1995) 508–511.
4.12. Preparation of compounds 25a and 26a (typical procedure)
[30] V.Y. Popkova, K. Burger, E. Herdtweck, J. Fluorine Chem. 75 (1995) 131–136.
[31] V.Y. Popkova, E.I. Mysov, M.V. Galakhov, V.K. Osmanov, L.S. German, Izv. Akad.
Nauk SSSR Ser. Khim. (1990) 2862–2865.
[32] G.G. Furin, E.L. Zhuzhgov, Russ. J. Gen. Chem. (Transl.) 74 (2004) 1534–1537.
[33] N. Ishikawa, A. Sekiya, Nippon Kagaku Kaishi (1972) 2214–2216.
To a solution of 4 g (0.04 mol) KSCN in 100 mL of dry THF, the
olefin 25 (10.5 g, 0.035 mol) or imidoyl fluoride 26 (15.1 g,