Article
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2011, Vol. 54, No. 3 867
at 4 °C overnight. After postfixating with ferrocyanide-reduced
osmium tetroxide and dehydration in a graded series of ethanol,
samples were infiltrated with a 1:1 mixture of acetonitril/Epon
resin (AGAR 100, DDSA, MNA, and DMP-30) overnight. Pure
resin was applied the following day and after polymerization
ultrathin sections were prepared. Microscopy was carried out
on a JEOL JEM-1010 TEM and representative pictures were
taken.
Acknowledgment. We thank Lytix Biopharma A/S for
financial support and Espen Hansen (Marbio, Tromsø Norway)
for assistance with HRMS.
Supporting Information Available: Spectroscopic data for all
the compounds 4a-d, 5a-d, 6a-d, and 7a-d, as well as general
procedures for the synthesis of 1a-d, 2a-d, and 3a-d. This
material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
Synthesis of β2,2-Amino Acid Derivatives. Synthesis of the
Boc-protected β2,2-amino acids was conducted in accordance
with our previous publication; please see Hansen et al. for details
and yields, and the Supporting Information for general pro-
cedures.22
References
(1) Bad Bugs, No Drugs; Infectious Diseases Society of America: Arlington,
VA, July, 2004; p 37.
(2) Corey, G. R.; Stryjewski, M. E.; Weyenberg, W.; Yasothan, U.;
Kirkpatrick, P. Telavancin. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2009, 8, 929–
930.
(3) Boucher, H. W.; Talbot, G. H.; Bradley, J. S.; Edwards, J. E.;
Gilbert, D.; Rice, L. B.; Scheld, M.; Spellberg, B.; Bartlett, J. Bad
Bugs, No Drugs: No ESKAPE! An Update from the Infectious
Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009, 48, 1–12.
(4) Peet, N. P. Drug resistance: a growing problem. Drug Discovery
Today 2010, 15, 583–586.
General Procedure for Synthesis of 4a-d, 5a-d, 6a-d, and
7a-d (GP1). The synthesis was based on the textbook of Chan
and White.27 In brief, the Boc-protected β2,2-amino acids (3a-d)
(typically 0.2 mmol) were dissolved in DMF (0.02 M) and
DIPEA (3 equiv) was added along with TFFH (1 equiv). The
β2,2-amino acids were activated for 2 h before the desired amine
was added (2 equiv). Each reaction was followed by MS, and
allowed to react for up to 7 days before it was diluted with ethyl
acetate and washed with brine. The organic phase was dried over
MgSO4, filtered, and evaporated to dryness. The Boc-protected
β2,2-amino acid derivatives were deprotected by dissolving them
in DCM, adding an equivalent volume of TFA/TIS/water
(95:2.5:2.5) and stirred at r.t. for 2 h before evaporation to
dryness. The crude products were purified by preparative RP-
HPLC and lyophilized. The purity of the compounds was
checked by analytical HPLC with a PDA detector spanning
from 210 to 310 nm. All compounds possessed purity above
95%, as determined by analytical HPLC-PDA at 214 and
254 nm.
Synthesis of 3-Amino-1-(4-(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl)piperazin-
1-yl)-2,2-bis(4-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl)propan-1-one (4b). The
synthesis was conducted according to GP1. 1H NMR (CD3OD):
δ 2.94-3.04 (9H, m); 3.12 (2H, d, J = 14.9 Hz); 3.19 (2H, br t);
3.50 (2H, br t); 3.55 (2H, d, J = 14.9 Hz); 7.44 (4H, d, J =
8.1 Hz); 7.67 (4H, d, J = 8.1 Hz). 13C NMR (CD3OD): δ 39.6;
43.9; 45.1; 51.9; 52.3; 53.5; 118.2; 124.7; 126.7; 130.7; 131.0;
132.0; 140.9; 172.5. HRMS-ESIþ: [M þ H]þ calcd: 545.2713
found: 545.2718, C27H35F6N4O.
Synthesis of 3-Amino-1-(4-(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl)piperazin-
1-yl)-2,2-bis(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl)propan-1-one (4c). The synthe-
sis was conducted according to GP1. 1H NMR (CD3OD): δ 2.98
(6H, s); 3.07 (2H, s); 3.25 (2H, br d); 3.44 (2H, t, J = 6.9 Hz); 3.61
(2H, t, J = 6.9 Hz); 3.67 (2H, d, J = 14.8 Hz); 7.36 (2H, dd J =
8.4 Hz, J = 1.1 Hz); 7.46-7.52 (4H, m); 7.72 (2H, s); 7.83-7.88
(6H, m). 13C NMR (CD3OD): δ 40.3; 43.9; 45.8; 52.0; 52.4; 52.9;
53.4; 127.3; 127.6; 128.6; 128.8; 129.1; 129.5; 130.1; 133.9; 134.0;
134.9; 173.6. HRMS-ESIþ: [M þ H]þ calcd: 509.3278 found:
509.3283, C33H41N4O.
Synthesis of 3-Amino-2,2-bis(4-tert-butylbenzyl)-N-(2-(dimethyl-
amino)ethyl)propanamide (6d). 1H NMR (CD3OD): δ 1.28 (18H,
s); 2.89-2.92 (8H); 2.97 (2H, s); 3.17 (2H, d, J = 14.2 Hz); 3.30
(2H, t, J = 6.1 Hz); 3.60 (2H, t, J = 6.0 Hz); 7.14 (4H, d J =
8.1 Hz); 7.36 (4H, d, J = 8.1 Hz). 13C NMR (CD3OD): δ 31.7
(q, J = 21 Hz); 35.2; 36.2 (t, J = 20 Hz); 40.5; 43.2; 43.8; 50.6;
58.4 (t, J = 20 Hz); 126.6; 131.2; 133.3; 151.4; 177.8. Multiplets
probably occurring due to insufficient carbon decoupling.
HRMS-ESIþ: [M þ H]þ calcd: 452.3639 found: 452.3650,
C29H46N3O.
(5) Collier, R. Drug development cost estimates hard to swallow.
CMAJ 2009, 180, 279–280.
(6) Boucher, H. W.; Corey, G. R. Epidemiology of methicillin-resis-
tant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008, 46 (Suppl 5),
S344–S349.
(7) King, M. D.; Humphrey, B. J.; Wang, Y. F.; Kourbatova, E. V.;
Ray, S. M.; Blumberg, H. M. Emergence of community-acquired
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA 300 clone as the
predominant cause of skin and soft-tissue infections. Ann. Intern.
Med. 2006, 144, 309–317.
(8) Moran, G. J.; Krishnadasan, A.; Gorwitz, R. J.; Fosheim, G. E.;
McDougal, L. K.; Carey, R. B.; Talan, D. A. Methicillin-resistant
S. aureus infections among patients in the emergency department.
N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 355, 666–674.
(9) Taubes, G. The bacteria fight back. Science 2008, 321, 356–361.
(10) Karthikeyan, K. K.; Mark, A. T.; Timothy, R. W.; Jay, B.;
Fafhana, B.; Ravikumar, B.; Uma, C.; Michel, D.; Christian,
G. G.; Seema, I.; Padma, K.; Anil, V. K.; Sunil, M.; Shazad, M.;
Tabassum, N.; David, L. P.; Andrew, P.; Claire, P.; Rachel, P.;
Bhargavi, R.; Ujjwayini, R.; Jayanta, B. S.; Madhu, S.; Elizabeth,
S.; Mandayam, A. T.; Jane, T.; Supriya, U.; Marina, W.; William,
W.; David, M. L.; Neil, W. Emergence of a new antibiotic
resistance mechanism in India, Pakistan, and the UK: a molecular,
biological, and epidemiological study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2010, 10,
597–602.
(11) Opar, A. Bad bugs need more drugs. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery
2007, 6, 943–944.
(12) Todd, B. Beyond MRSA: VISA and VRSA: what will ward off
these pathogens in health care facilities? Am. J. Nurs. 2006, 106
28–30.
(13) Giuliani, A.; Pirri, G.; Nicoletto, S. F. Antimicrobial peptides: an
overview of a promising class of therapeutics. Cent. Eur. J. Biol.
2007, 2, 1–33.
(14) Wang, G.; Li, X.; Wang, Z. APD2: the updated antimicrobial
peptide database and its application in peptide design. Nucleic
Acids Res. 2009, 37, D933–937.
AP/main.php (2010.09.28).
(16) Hancock, R. E. Peptide antibiotics. Lancet 1997, 349, 418–422.
(17) Yeaman, M. R.; Yount, N. Y. Mechanisms of antimicrobial
peptide action and resistance. Pharmacol Rev 2003, 55, 27–55.
(18) Hancock, R. E. R.; Sahl, H.-G. Antimicrobial and host-defense
peptides as new anti-infective therapeutic strategies. Nat. Biotech-
nol. 2006, 24, 1551–1557.
(19) Welling, M. M.; Hiemstra, P. S.; van den Barselaar, M. T.;
Paulusma-Annema, A.; Nibbering, P. H.; Pauwels, E. K.; Calame,
W. Antibacterial activity of human neutrophil defensins in experi-
mental infections in mice is accompanied by increased leukocyte
accumulation. J. Clin. Invest. 1998, 102, 1583–1590.
(20) Koczulla, A. R.; Bals, R. Antimicrobial peptides: current status
and therapeutic potential. Drugs 2003, 63, 389–406.
Synthesis of 3-Amino-N-(2-aminoethyl)-2,2-bis(4-tert-butyl-
benzyl)propanamide (7d). The synthesis was conducted accord
ing to GP1. 1H NMR (CD3OD): δ 1.31 (18H, s); 2.91 (2H, d,
J = 14.1 Hz); 2.96 (2H, s); 3.10 (2H, t, J = 6.2 HZ); 3.16 (2H,
d, J = 14.1); 3.51 (2H, t, J = 6.2 Hz); 7.15 (4H, d, J = 8.2 Hz);
7.38 (4H, d, J = 8.3 Hz). 13C NMR (CD3OD): δ 31.7; 35.3;
38.6; 40.6; 43.4; 50.5; 126.6; 131.2; 133.5; 151.5; 177.3.
HRMS-ESIþ: [M þ H]þ calcd: 424.3326 found: 424.3324,
(21) Brouwer, C. P.; Sarda-Mantel, L.; Meulemans, A.; Le Guludec, D.;
Welling, M. M. The use of technetium-99m radiolabeled human
antimicrobial peptides for infection specific imaging. Mini Rev.
Med. Chem. 2008, 8, 1039–1052.
(22) Hansen, T.; Alst, T.; Havelkova, M.; Strøm, M. B. Antimicrobial
C
27H42N3O.
activity of small β-peptidomimetics based on the pharmacophore