Communications
doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.202100013
ChemMedChem
(1:1) under microwave irradiation to generate intermediates
7a–c. The acid component was subsequently coupled to
various heterocyclic amines to afford the pyrazolo[3,4-d]
pyrimidin-3-yl)phenyl) acetamide derivatives (Scheme S3). De-
rivative 8s was synthesized according to the synthetic route
depicted in Scheme S4. Reaction of 4-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-
dioxaborolan-2-yl) aniline with triphosgene in presence of
substitution with terminal alcohol 3g, isopentane 3i, pyran 3k,
and 3-methoxypropane 3f improved RET potency and selectiv-
ity against TRKA. Of these, 3-methoxypropane (3f; RET IC50 =
1.9�2.81 μM) was found to be the most potent in reducing cell
viability with 50-fold selectivity over TRKA.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
To probe interactions in the kinase back pocket of RET
(Domain I), C-3 pyrazoloadenines fragment derivatives were
generated (Table S2). All substitutions off the C-3 carbon were
found selective for RET over TRKA (4a–d). Of these, phenyl 4a
(RET IC50 =6.82�2.22 μM) and 1-methyl-1H-pyrazole 4d (RET
IC50 =1.044�0.27 μM) were most potent. Analyzing 4a and 4d
in the RET active site revealed that the phenyl ring of 4a
accesses the RET back pocket through a π-π interaction with
Phe893 of the DFG-out motif, while the pyrazole of 4d did not;
hence 4a was considered for additional modification to better
exploit Domain I (Figure S3). To further develop the pyrazoloa-
denine SAR, derivatives were synthesized to expand into the
back pocket of RET. 6a and 6e were found to be most active
against RET with TRKA selectivity, albeit without cell activity.
The pyrazoloadenine SAR was further developed by modify-
ing substituents in the back pocket (Domain I) while simulta-
neously altering groups at the solvent front (6a–e, 7a–c;
Domain II; Table S3). Among these 6a, its acidic derivative 7a,
and the N-pyran-substituted derivative 6e were most active.
Extension of the aryl substituent at the C-3 position, via a
carboxylic acid handle, facilitated the exploration of the RET
allosteric pocket. A small library of pyrazoloadenine acetamides
were synthesized using different aromatic and heterocyclic
amines to investigate this pocket (Tables 1 and S4).
°
triethylamine in THF at 60 C for 6 hours provided the
isocyanate 10. Subsequent addition of 5-(tert-butyl)isoxazol-3-
amine to intermediate 10 provided 1-(5-(tert-butyl)isoxazol-3-
yl)-3-(4-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)phenyl)urea
11 which was subjected to Suzuki coupling to furnish the
derivative 8s.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
Results and Discussion
Inhibitor design by a fragment-based optimization approach
The pyrazoloadenine warhead (fragment 1) was subjected to a
biochemical screen (RET and TRKA) and an oncogene-driven
cellular screen (LC-2ad and KM-12). TRKA was employed as an
oncoprotein control because of its similarity to the RET kinase
domain;[20] if compounds exhibit selectivity against TRKA, this
suggests selectivity in the greater kinome. The biochemical
screen indicated selectivity of fragment 1 for RET (RET IC50 =
9.20 μM) over TRK (TRKA IC50 =57.07 μM). However, the frag-
ment was found to reduce cell viability in both oncogene-
driven cell lines (EC50 =1.47 μM and 1.73 μM, respectively for
LC-2ad and KM-12) along with A549 (EC50 =3.02 μM; cytotoxic
control). Despite exhibiting biochemical relevance, fragment 1
was found to be too cytotoxic by nonselectively reducing cell
viability, suggesting the fragment did not possess oncoprotein
selectivity. To remove the cytotoxicity profile, fragment 1 was
visualized in the RET active site to identify ligand-protein
interactions to improve affinity (Figure S2).
Fragment 1 was modeled in a RET DFG-out homology
model since molecules that interact with the DFG-out fold of
RET possess improved selectivity.[21] By analyzing ligand-protein
interactions, it was found that fragment 1 formed two hydrogen
bonds with hinge residues Ala807 and Glu805 and π-π
interactions with Phe893 at the DFG-motif (Figure S2). The
modeling study suggested the possibility for fragment expan-
sion at the solvent front (Domain II) and the allosteric pocket
(Domain I; Figure S2). Using modeling insight, fragment 1
underwent expansion at the R1 position. To probe interactions
at the solvent front (Domain II), several pyrazoloadenines
fragment derivatives were generated (Table S1). N-Methyl
substitution slightly improved potency against RET (RET IC50 =
3.3 μM; LC-2/ad EC50 =1 μM) but was still cytotoxic (A549 EC50 =
1 μM). Introducing polar groups, such as morpholino ethyl 3b
and N,N-dimethylethyl 3c, improved RET activity and lowered
cytotoxicity but cell activity diminished likely from permeability
issues. Substituting with aromatic groups such as 2-methyl
pyridine 3e and 4-(methylsulfonyl)benzene 3d decreased
potency, whereas propanenitrile 3j and methoxyethane 3h
drastically reduced activity (Table S1). On the other hand, N-
In general, when R1 was methyl pyridine, modification with
aryl and heteroaryl amines yielded compounds with weak
activity (8i, j). However, when R3 was 3-cyclopropyl-N-methyl
pyrazol-5-amine (8m), 3-(tert-butyl)-N-methyl pyrazol-5-amine
(8l), or 3-(trifluoromethyl)aniline (8k) compounds exhibited
improved cellular activities consistent with enzymatic activities.
Solubilizing groups, such as morpholino ethyl (8n), exhibited
decent RET inhibition but weak cellular activity, whereas N,N-
dimethylethyl (8o) had diminished RET activity and very poor
cellular activity.
A set of pyrazolo pyrimido phenylacetamides (8a–m) were
synthesized to further define the SAR at the RET back pocket
(Tables 1 and S4). Amide modifications with aromatic amines,
such as 3-(fluoromethyl)aniline (8a), exhibited reduced RET
inhibition (RET IC50 =35.5 μM) in spite maintaining cellular
activity (LC-2/ad EC50 =1.68 μM), whereas 3-(trifluoromethyl)
aniline (8c) exhibited RET inhibition (RET IC50 =0.0562 μM)
consistent with cellular activity (LC-2/ad EC50 =0.37 μM). Five-
membered heterocyclic amines, 3-(tert-butyl)pyrazol-5-amine
(8d) and 3-(tert-butyl)-1-isopropyl pyrazol-5-amine (8f), exhib-
ited RET inhibition consistent with cellular activity. While 3-
cyclopropyl pyrazol-5-amine (8e) exhibited selectivity for RET
over TRKA, the analogue had very poor cellular activity, whereas
3-(tert-butyl)-1-cyclohexyl pyrazol-5-amine (8h) exhibited inhib-
ition of both RET and TRKA while maintaining cellular activity.
When 5-(tert-butyl) isoxazol-3-amine (8b) was utilized as the
amine input, the compound exhibited selectivity for RET over
TRKA (RET IC50 =0.00057 μM; TRKA IC50 =0.202 μM). These
ChemMedChem 2021, 16, 1–5
2
© 2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH
��
These are not the final page numbers!