B. Ruan et al. / Inorganica Chimica Acta 365 (2011) 473–479
475
Table 1
between them, which usually produce the fluorescence quench
and the red-shifted fluorescence of organic intra-molecular
0
Selected bond lengths (AÅ) and angles (°) for complexes KK1 and KK2.
charge transfer of
the KK1 and KK2 avoid
angled phenyl groups.
p–p*. Proved by the X-ray structures, both
1. [nBu3SnOL]n (KK1)
Bond lengths
Sn(1)–O(1)
C(21)–O(1)
p–p interactions either by n-butyl or
2.1689(117) Sn(1)–O(2)
1.3006(116) C(21)–O(2)
2.4137(86)
1.2187(161)
2.3. Antibacterial activity
Bond angles
O(2)–Sn(1)–O(1)
O(1)–C(21)–O(2)
[Ph3SnOL]n (KK2)
Bond lengths
Sn(2)–O(4)
C(21)–O(1)
Sn(1)–O(2)
C(21)–O(3)
Bond angles
O(4)–Sn(2)–O(1)
O(1)–C(21)–O(2)
O(2)–Sn(1)–O(3)
O(3)–C(21)–O(4)
172.851(354)
122.669(1199) C(21)–O(2)–Sn(1) 136.795(811)
Sn(1)–O(1)–C(21) 121.888(859)
Data on the antibacterial activity of the complexes KK1 and
KK2, together with those of the starting materials [HL, n(Bu3Sn)2O
and Ph3Sn(OH)], against B. subtilis, S. aureus (Gram positive), P.
aeruginosa and E. coli (Gram-negative) bacterial, are presented in
Table 2. From the MIC values, it is apparent that the organotin(IV)
complexes were more toxic towards Gram-positive strains than
Gram-negative strains. The reason may be the difference in the
structures of the cell walls [19]. The walls of the Gram-negative
cells are more complex than those of Gram-positive cells. Lipopoly-
saccharides form an outer lipid membrane and contribute to the
complex antigenic specificity of Gram-negative cells. It is sug-
gested that the anti-microbial activity of the complexes is due to
either by killing the microbes or inhibiting their multiplication
by blocking their active sites [20]. Since the molecular structures
of the two complexes are quite similar, the only difference being
the groups attaching to the central tin atoms (butyl in complex
KK1 versus phenyl in complex KK2), the slightly better antibacte-
rial activity of complex KK2 can be attribute to the presence of
phenyl groups, which facilitate binding to biological molecules
2.1812(24)
1.2552(40)
2.1855(27)
1.2526(51)
Sn(2)–O(1)
C(21)–O(2)
Sn(1)–O(3)
C(21)–O(4)
2.3083(24)
1.2661(41)
2.2963(26)
1.2690(44)
169.634(89)
122.674(323)
172.177(89)
122.043(323)
Sn(2)–O(1)–C(21) 140.159(229)
C(21)–O(2)–Sn(1) 134.084(223)
Sn(1)–O(3)–C(21) 141.049(230)
C(21)–O(4)–Sn(2) 133.613(222)
1599 cmꢀ1 in the respective IR spectrum of complexes KK1 and
KK2 is assigned the asymmetric vibration of the COO moiety. As
for complexes KK1 and KK2, the 119Sn NMR spectra exhibit a single
resonance at d ꢀ146.5 and ꢀ121.4 ppm, respectively, indicating
that they both have only one type of penta-coordinate tin atoms
[18].
The molecular structures of complexes KK1 and KK2 with the
atom numbering scheme are depicted in Figs. 1 and 2, respectively.
Selected bond lengths and angles with their estimated standard
deviations are listed in Table 1. Both the complexes KK1 and KK2
possess infinite 1D zigzag chain structures with a five-coordinated
tin center, which are generated by the bidentate bridging carboxylic
acid ligands and the Sn center. Thus, the coordination geometry
about the Sn atom is best described as distorted trigonal bipyrami-
dal with two O atoms and three C atoms, which exhibits trans-
R3SnO2 geometry. The two O atoms occupy the apical positions
[axial angles: O(2)–Sn(1)–O(1) = 172.851(354)° for complex KK1;
O(2)–Sn(1)–O(3) = 172.177(89)°, O(4)–Sn(2)–O(1) = 169.634(89)°,
for complex KK2], while the carbon atoms are in the equatorial
plane. The Sn, 3C system is basically planar [Sn(1)C(22)C(24)C(25),
the C–Sn–C angles ranging from 118.437(592) to 120.931(563)°, for
complex KK1; Sn(1)C(66)C(72)C(73), the C–Sn–C angles ranging
from 112.410(146) to 125.468(182)°, Sn(2)C(48)C(54)C(60), the
C–Sn–C angles ranging from 117.819(158) to 123.718(183)°, for
complex KK2]. The O atoms of the ligand bridges the Sn atoms
and gives rise to different Sn–O bond lengths [Sn(1)–O(1) = 2.1689
(117), Sn(1)–O(2) = 2.4137(86), for complex KK1; Sn(1)–O(2) =
by
p
–
p
interactions.
The enhanced bactericidal activity of the ligand on complexa-
tion with organotin(IV) precursors may be explained by chelation
theory, according to which chelation reduces the polarity of the
central metal atom because of partial sharing of its positive charge
with the donor groups and possible p-electron delocalization with-
in the whole chelate ring [21,22]. This chelation increases the lipo-
philic nature of the central atom, which favours the permeation of
the complexes through the lipid layer of the cell membrane. Com-
pounds inhibit the growth of bacterial to greater extent as concen-
tration increased.
3. Experimental
3.1. Materials and methods
The reagents employed in the present study were purchased
from commercial sources and used without further purification.
The ligand (E)-3-(4-(diphenylamino)phenyl)acrylic acid was pre-
pared by the literature method [23,24], see Scheme 1. Carbon,
hydrogen and nitrogen assays were carried out with a CHN–O-Rapid
instrument and were within 0.4% of the theoretical values. IR
spectra were record on a Nicolet 470 FT-IR spectrophotometer
2.1855 (27), Sn(1)–O(3) = 2.2963(26), Sn(2)–O(1) = 2.3083(24),
0
Sn(2)–O(4) = 2.1812(24) ÅA, for complex KK2]. These Sn–O bond
lengths are a little longer than the Sn–O covalent bond lengths
0
using KBr discs in the range 4000–400 cmꢀ1 1H and 13C NMR
.
[2.038–2.115 ÅA]. The Sn–C bond lengths are consistent with those
reported in other organotin(IV) complexes. Layers of the two
complexes are depicted in Figs. 3 and 4, respectively.
spectra were recorded on a Bruker AV 400 spectrometer with TMS
as internal standard. 119Sn NMR spectra (proton-decoupled) were
recorded on a Bruker AV 400 spectrometer operating at 150 MHz;
resonances are referenced to tetramethyltin (external standard,
119Sn). The solid-state luminescence spectra measured by F-4500
FL Spectrophotometer. The PMT Voltage is 700 V and the Scan
speed is 240 nm/min. The EX and EM Slit are 1.0 nm and 5.0 nm,
respectively.
2.2. Solid-state luminescence emission
The solid-state luminescence spectra measured by F-4500 FL
Spectrophotometer was shown in Fig. 5. It’s exciting to discover
that KK1 and KK2 exhibit strong solid-state fluorescence emis-
sion while the HL almost quenches. The luminescence photograph
of the three compounds under 365 nm irradiation was shown in
Fig. 6. KK1 shows blue color and KK2 shows blue/green color.
The reason for this huge variation is that most coordination pro-
cess is the process in which the addition of metal cores to the
3.2. Synthesis of (E)-3-(4-(diphenylamino)phenyl)acrylic acid (HL)
4-(Diphenylamino)benzaldehyde (2.73 g, 10 mmol) and malon-
ic acid (2.16 g, 30 mmol) were added to 60 mL pyridine and stirred
at 90 °C for 2 h in the presence of 1 mL of piperidine, followed by
adjustment of pH 1 with dilute HCl solution. A yellow crude
organic ligands always breaks down the original
p–p interactions