486
M. J. Boyd et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 484–487
O
OH
120
100
Boc
Br
N
NH2
80
4
60
40
20
0
a-d
g-j
F
F
O
OH
N
F
N
Naïve 0.006
0.06
Dose (mg/kg)
0.2
0.6
2
6
NH2
+
Figure 1. Inhibition by 1e of secondary paw swelling in rats with AIA. Complete
Freund’s adjuvant was injected into left hind paw on day 0. Compound 1e was
administered starting on day 9, once daily for 9 days. Secondary paw volume was
measured at day 18. The percentage of inhibition was calculated from the difference
between a treated group (n = 7/group) and a vehicle control. Vertical bars show
SEM.
8
7
e
N
F
H
F
F
N
O
N
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
9
f
N
N
N
HN
F
H
N
F
F
O
Naïve Vehicle 0.03
0.1
1
3
10
N
Dose (mg/kg)
Figure 2. Inhibition by 1e of carrageenan-induced mechanical hyperalgesia.
Carrageenan is injected into the rat’s paw at t = 0 h and 1e was administered at
t = 2 h. The hyperalgesic response is measured at t = 3 h by applying mechanical
pressure to the paw and measuring the latency in paw withdrawal. **, p <0.01
versus vehicle control by one way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. Vertical bars
show SEM (n = 5/group).
10
Scheme 2. Synthesis of tetrazole 10. Reagents: (a) CH2N2, MeOH; (b) TFA, DCM; (c)
NaH, 4-CF3ArCH2Br, THF; (d) KOH, MeOH, THF, ; (e) HATU, DIPEA, ACN; (f)
azidotributyltin, toluene,
N,N0-dimethylcyclohexane-1,2-diamine, dioxane,
D
D
, AcOH; (g) Boc2O, TEA, MeOH; (h) CuI, NaI, rac-trans-
D
; (i) CuI, NaCN, N,N0-dimethyl-
ethylenediamine, toluene,
D; (j) HCOOH, DCM.
The efficacy of compound 1e was evaluated in both the rat adju-
vant-induced arthritis model (AIA), and in the rat carrageenan-in-
duced mechanical hyperalgesia model. In the AIA, 1e dose
dependently reduced secondary paw swelling with NSAID/Coxib
like efficacy (Fig. 1) and completely inhibited secondary paw swell-
Table 3
Pharmacokinetics
t1/2 (h)
F (%)
Cl (mL/min/kg)
1a
1b
1c
1e
10
4.4
4.8
4.7
4.1
2.6
65
73
102
48
26
12
9
11
28
ing at
a dose of 0.6 mg/kg/day. In the carrageenan-induced
mechanical hyperalgesia model, 1e showed dose dependant inhibi-
tion of pain with a maximum of 64% inhibition relative to vehicle at
10 mg/kg (Fig. 2).
54
In conclusion, a novel benzyl indoline series of EP4 ligands was
discovered. Agonism and antagonism can be modulated by simple
modifications on the benzyl moiety. The compounds in this series
have good pharmacokinetic properties and are efficacious in
pre-clinical models of pain and inflammation.
potentially altered the pharmacokinetics; however, this modifica-
tion did not improve half-life or lower clearance in rats (Table 3).
In order to better understand the clearance pathway of these
compounds, a radiolabelled version of 1e was prepared from 1q
by palladium catalyzed tritiation. A rat bile cannulation study
was performed with 3H-1e, and LC/MS analysis of the bile indi-
cated that the compound is mostly excreted as glucuronide and
taurine conjugates, with very small amounts of parent. In total,
86% of the total radioactivity was recovered in the first 24 hours
from bile.
In order to predict the potential of toxicity resulting from cova-
lent protein labelling from acyl glucoronide migration or oxidative
metabolism,6 in vitro and in vivo covalent labelling studies were
performed with 3H-1e. It was found that the extent of covalent
protein labelling was relatively low in both rat and human hepato-
cytes (56 and 28 pmole-eq/mg @ 2 h, respectively). And an in vivo
covalent protein labelling study in rat also showed a relatively
small amount of labelling (5 pmol/mg protein).
References and notes
1. (a) Portanova, P. P.; Zhang, Y.; Anderson, G. D.; Hauser, S. D.; Masferrer, J. L.;
Seibert, K.; Gregory, S. A.; Isakson, P. C. J. Exp. Chem. 1996, 184, 883; (b) Trebino,
C. E.; Stock, J. L.; Gibbons, C. P.; Naiman, B. M.; Wachtmann, T. S.; Umland, J. P.;
Pandher, K.; Lapointe, J.-M.; Saha, S.; Roach, M. L.; Carter, D.; Thomas, N. A.;
Durtschi, B. A.; McNeish, J. D.; Hambor, J. E.; Jakobsson, P.-J.; Carty, T. J.; Perez, J.
R.; Audoly, L. P. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 9044; (c) Akaogi, J.; Nozaki,
T.; Satoh, M.; Yamada, H. Endocr. Metab. Immune Disord.: Drug Targets 2006, 6,
383.
2. McCoy, J. M.; Wicks, J. R.; Audoly, L. P. J. Clin. Invest. 2002, 110, 651.
3. (a) Clark, P.; Rowland, S. E.; Denis, D.; Mathieu, M.-C.; Stocco, R.; Poirier, H.;
Burch, J.; Han, Y.; Audoly, L.; Therien, A. G.; Xu, D. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2008,
325, 425; (b) Burch, J. D.; Belley, M.; Fortin, R.; Deschênes, D.; Girard, M.; Colucci,
J.; Farand, J.; Therien, A. G.; Mathieu, M.-C.; Denis, D.; Vigneault, E.; Lévesque, J.-
F.; Gagné, S.; Xu, D.; Clark, P.; Rowland, S.; Han, Y. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008,
18, 2048; (c) Blouin, M.; Han, Y.; Burch, J.; Farand, J.; Mellon, C.; Gaudreault, M.;