Table 1. Ring Expansion: Nitrogen Substituent Toleranceh
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis for Chiral Pyrrolines
entry
P =
time (h)
yield of 11 (%)
a
b
c
d
e
f
Ts
5
2
2
2
5
1
5
5
2
5
92
97
0c
0d
60
0e
NPhtha,b
Pha
Bna
Boc
vinyl aziridines).6 The union of an imine and suitably acti-
vated nucleophile quickly emerged as the optimal approach
(Scheme 1). The imine-based retrosynthetic analysis is
highlighted for chiral pyrroline 3, which we envisioned
would originate from the copper-catalyzed ring expansion
of a trans- or cis-vinyl aziridine (4 and 5). These isomeric
vinyl aziridinescould beaccessedbytreating imines7 and 8
with nucleophiles 6 and 9, respectively. An attractive fea-
ture of this disconnection approach is that either the imine
or the nucleophile could serve the role of chiral auxiliary.
Prior to assembling the requisite chiral aziridines it was
of critical importance to learn what other nitrogen protect-
ing groups (P) besides Ts and Phth might also be suitable
for this reaction (Table 1). We realized that aryl- and acyl-
substituted aziridines would be particularly challenging
substrates, given their known tendency to undergo com-
peting Claisen rearrangements or intramolecular displace-
ment reactions.7 This prediction turned out to be true as in
the case of N-benzyl (entry d) a known hydride shift oc-
curred instead,8 while for N-phenyl (entry c) the expected
Claisen rearrangement was observed.9 Boc-protected azir-
idine 10 (entry e) did ring expand to the desired 3-pyrroline,10
while in contrast when a benzoyl group (entry j) was pre-
sent, the ring expansion failed and instead a mixture of
five- and seven-membered heterocycles was formed.11
When vinyl aziridine 10 was not protected (NH, entry i)
it rapidly oligomerized when subjected to the reaction con-
ditions. Curiously, the tert-butyl sulfinamide-substituted
vinyl aziridine (entry f) formed 1-phenylbutadiene in high
yield rather than the expected 3-pyrroline product (11).12
We were delighted to find that 4-nitrobenzylsulfonamide
(Ns) and Bus tert-butylsulfonamide (Bus) groups, in
S(O)tBu
Bus
g
h
i
86
94
0f
0g
Ns
H
j
Bz
a Racemic aziridine used. b Cis/trans mixture. c Mixture of azepine
and 2-pyrroline products. d (Z)-N-Benzylidene-1-phenylbut-2-en-1-
amine isolated in 86% yield. e (E)-Buta-1,3-dien-1-ylbenzene formed in
69% yield. f Polymer formed. g Five and seven membered ring products
observed. h Conditions: 5 mol % Cu(hfacac)2, 150 °C.
addition to p-toluenesulfonamide (entry a), were compa-
tible with the ring expansion conditions. These studies
suggest that sulfonamides are especially well suited for
our ring expansion reaction.
Armed with insights into what aziridine protecting groups
are compatible with our reaction conditions we turned our
attention to the design of a scalable asymmetric route to
vinyl aziridine substrates. The use of proline derivatives as
organocatalysts13 and as key building blocks of many
pharmaceuticals and natural products14 ensures its status
as a privileged structural motif. Chiral 2,3-dehydroproline
(3-pyrroline) products commonly originate from natural
3-hydroxy proline,15 and this neglected family of chiral
proline products emerged as an ideal target for our new
methodology. Retrosynthetic analysis for 2,5-dihydropyr-
rolidine 15 (Scheme 2) suggests that the chiral vinyl
aziridine ring expansion substrate (14) should originate
from a Darzens reaction16 between a bromo acetate (12)
and a chiral conjugated Ellman type imine17 (13). These
chiral imines are attractive substrates because they are
trivial to make, very stable, available in both enantiomeric
forms, and easy to handle. Since our nitrogen substituent
ring expansion compatibility study (Table 1) had
(6) Pellisier, H. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 1509–1555.
(7) Pommelet, J. C.; Chuche, J. Can. J. Chem. 1976, 54, 1571–1581.
(8) Somfai, P.; Ahman, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 1953–1956.
(9) Fantauzzi, S.; Gallo, E.; Caselli, A.; Piangiolino, C.; Ragaini, F.;
Re, N.; Cenini, S. Chem.;Eur. J. 2009, 15, 1241–1251.
(10) Mishra, A.; Rice, S. N.; Lwowski, W. J. Org. Chem. 1968, 33,
481–486.
(13) (a) Kotsuki, H.; Ikishima, H.; Okuyama, A. Heterocycles 2008,
75, 493–529. (b) Kotsuki, H.; Ikishima, H.; Okuyama, A. Heterocycles
2008, 75, 757–797.
(14) Mauger, A. M. J. Nat. Prod. 1996, 59, 1205–1211.
(15) (a) Meyer, S. C.; Ramanjulu, J.; Vera, M. D.; Pfizenmayer, A. J.;
Joullie, M. M. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 5192–5205. (b) Greenwood, E. S.;
Hitchcock, P. B.; Parsons, P. J. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 3307–3314.
(16) Davis, F. A.; Liu, H.; Zhou, P.; Fang, T.; Reddy, G. V.; Zhang, Y.
J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 7559–7567.
(17) (a) Liu, G.; Cogan, D. A.; Ellman, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
119, 9913–9914. (b) Ellman, J. A.; Owens, T. D.; Tang, T. P. Acc. Chem.
Res. 2002, 35, 984–995. (c) Davis, F. A.; Reddy, R. T.; Reddy, R. E. J.
Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 6387–6389. (d) Davis, F. A. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71,
8993–9003.
(11) Heine, H. W.; Fetter, M. E.; Nicholson, E. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1959, 81, 2202–2204.
(12) We have not been able to find other examples of this type of
deamination reaction for sulfinamide protected aziridines. Further-
more, we have tested this on several other substrates and observed the
same deamination behavior. Aziridine deaminations are not without
precedence, see: (a) Clard, R. D.; Helmkamp, G. K. J. Org. Chem. 1964,
29, 1316–1320. (b) Muller, R. K.; Felix, D.; Schreiber, J.; Eschenmosher,
A. Helv. Chim. Acta 1970, 53, 1479–1484.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 5, 2011
1111