14 (Scheme 1).21 A related structural fragment is found in
the oroidin dimers nagelamide R and T (8),17,22,23 and
therefore this chemistry may have value in approaches to
these natural products.23 To redirect this cyclization mani-
fold, two substrates were prepared in which the participa-
tion of the enol tautomer was not feasible. In the first case,
the ester analog of 11 was subjected to Pd-catalyzed
hydroamination (Pd(OAc)2, Cs2CO3), leading to forma-
tion of the morpholinone ring (13f16, 45%, Scheme 1),
the connectivity, and in particular the location and geo-
metry of the olefin, was established by X-ray crystallogra-
phy. Similarly, it was found that the Tr-protected amide 12
participated in the cyclization with Pd-catalysis providing
the corresponding pyrazinone 16 (∼80%, Scheme 1). In-
terestingly, we found that both reactions proceeded
equally or more efficiently in the absence of the Pd-
catalyst, indicating that the reaction is simply base-
mediated.24 Of particular note is the relative efficiency of
the base-induced formation of 16, which is presumably a
result of the buttressing effect of the Tr-moiety.25
Scheme 2
Given our success with the cyclization of substrates via
the pyrrole nitrogen (Scheme 1), we decided to introduce
substituents on this nitrogen to prevent cyclization via this
manifold to establish whether cyclization would occur via
C-H insertion at the pyrrole C4 atom (net hydroaryla-
tion).26,27 For convenience only, an N-methyl group was
employed. Under Pd-catalysis smooth cyclization of 17
occurred (Scheme 2) to provide what we initially antici-
pated was an isocyclooroidin skeleton; however, X-ray
crystallography provided something of a surprise. While
cyclization had occurred to provide a piperidine-type ring
system, there was net acyl migration resulting in the
formation of 18. While this result was unexpected, a rear-
ranged pyrrole moiety has been observed recently in two
examples of the oroidin alkaloids, e.g., cylindradine A
(22),28 and this modification may in fact be a more
common structural feature than currently realized. A
similar type of rearrangement has been noted previously
in the literature during a study of oxidative Heck-type
reactions with N-allyl pyrrolecarboxamides.29 This out-
come was rationalized mechanistically through ipso addi-
tion to form a spirocyclic intermediate, which then
rearranges to form fused systems. A similar mechanistic
proposal through spiro adduct 19 rearranging to the more
ꢀ
stable intermediate 20 (vis a vis the alternative rearrange-
ment pathway to 21) presumably accounts for the forma-
tion of the observed product 18.
Gold-catalyzed reactions of alkynes have recently at-
tracted considerable attention in the literature,30 and it
seemed relevant to establish the reactivity patterns of this
system. In particular, we were motivated by the notion that
access to stevensine-like systems (cf. 5 in Figure 1) might be
possible via a gold-catalyzed addition of the pyrrole to the
alkyne (hydroarylation).31 In an initial attempt, alkyne 17
was exposed to a Au(I) precatalyst resulting in conversion
of the starting material into a new cyclic product. Pre-
liminary structural assignment was complicated by signals
from the trityl moiety dominating the aromatic region of
1
the H NMR spectrum. Treatment of the initial product
withTFA resultedinthe cleavageofthe tritylmoietywhich
substantially simplified the spectroscopic data and allowed
us to assign the product structure as the N-methyl aniline
derivative 24 (Scheme 3). This structure was subsequently
confirmed through X-ray crystallography. Given the rela-
tively high temperatures required to effect this reaction,
it would suggest that this product is formed as a result
of an intramolecular Diels-Alder/ring-opening reaction
(21) Jia, C.; Piao, D.; Kitamura, T.; Fujiwara, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2000,
65, 7516.
(22) Appenzeller, J.; Tilvi, S.; Martin, M.-T.; Gallard, J.-F.; El-bitar,
H.; Dau, E. T. H.; Debitus, C.; Laurent, D.; Moriou, C.; Al-Mourabit,
A. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4874.
(23) Mukherjee, S.; Sivappa, R.; Yousufuddin, M.; Lovely, C. J.
Synlett 2010, 817.
(24) Llauger, L.; Bergami, C.; Kinzel, O. D.; Lillini, S.; Pescatore, G.;
Torrisi, C.; Jones, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 172.
(25) Choony, N.; Dadabhoy, A.; Sammes, P. G. Chem. Commun.
1997, 513.
(26) Liegault, B.; Lapointe, D.; Caron, L.; Vlassova, A.; Fagnou, K.
J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 1826.
(27) Gryko, D. T.; Vakuliuk, O.; Gryko, D.; Koszarna, B. J. Org.
Chem. 2009, 74, 9517.
(28) Kuramoto, M.; Miyake, N.; Ishimaru, Y.; Ono, N.; Uno, H.
(30) For recent reviews of gold chemistry, see: (a) Hashmi, A. S. K.
Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 3180. (b) Hashmi, A. S. K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2008, 47, 6754. (c) Li, Z.; Brouwer, C.; He, C. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108,
3239. (d) Muzart, J. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 5815. (e) Skouta, R.; Li, C.-J.
Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 4917. (f) Shen, H. C. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 3885.
Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 5465.
€
(29) Beccalli, E. M.; Broggini, G.; Martinelli, M.; Paladino, G.
Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 1077.
(31) Gruit, M.; Michalik, D.; Kruger, K.; Spannenberg, A.; Tillack,
A.; Pews-Davtyan, A.; Beller, M. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 3341.
1384
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 6, 2011