while use of 4b resulted in poor yield and low levels of
product enantiomeric excess. No further development of
these types of catalyst have since been reported.
We therefore embarked upon the development and eva-
luation of a small catalyst library of general structure 5.
These systems incorporate variable substituents at C-910,11
and C-50 so that the steric requirement and electronic/
hydrogen bond donating properties of the catalyst can be
systematically modulated. We wished to evaluate the per-
formance of these catalysts in the enantioselective Henry
reaction involving trifluoromethylketone substrates.
This reaction was selected for a number of reasons: (a) it
is synthetically useful, generating trifluoromethylated chiral
products (of general interest due to their unique properties12
and pharmaceutical/agrochemical relevance13) incorpo-
rating a quaternary stereocenter;14 (b) it represented a sig-
nificant challenge—at the outset of this study the only
direct catalytic methodology for the enantioselective catalysis
of this reaction utilized 25 mol % of a chiral La complex
at -40 °C;15,16 (c) as mentioned previously, bifunctional
(thio)ureas have found widespread application in the cata-
lysis of additions to imines and Michael acceptors; however,
relatively few reactions involving additions to carbonyl
compounds promoted by this class of catalyst have been
reported;1,3,17 and (d) since Hiemstra5 reported that 3a
promoted Henry reactions with aldehyde substrates, we were
intrigued as to how a catalyst characterized by bifunctional
components in closer proximity would fare in an analogous,
yet more challenging 1,2-addition reaction.
Figure 1. Representative C-9-, C-60-, and C-50-modified cincho-
na alkaloid catalysts and the proposed novel library 5.
Inspired by the catalytically useful cupreine/cupreidine
family1a,h of natural product derivatives, Hiemstra et al.
previously developed the C-60 thiourea-substituted cinch-
ona alkaloid catalyst 3a and demonstrated it capable of
highly efficient asymmetric nitroaldol reactions involving
aromatic aldehydes,5 while a similar catalyst with a larger
C-9 substituent for catalysis of the addition of thiols to
enones was later developed by Deng.6,7
As this work was in progress, Bandini et al.18 reported
the first organocatalytic variant of this process using a C-9
acylated cupreine derivative. Under optimized conditions,
excellent product yields and enantioselectivities were possible.
Our study began with the synthesis of a small library of
cinchona alkaloids substituted at C-50 with functionality
capable of hydrogen-bond donation (i.e., 5a-j, Table 1).
These were evaluated as promoters of the addition of
nitromethane to R,R,R-trifluoroacetophenone (6) in THF
at ambient temperature.
The installation of catalytically useful functionality at
C-50 is considerably less well explored. Jørgensen8 and
Deng9 have independently developed hydrazide-substi-
tuted catalysts of general type 4a and 4b, respectively,
which exploit the reaction between cupreines and diazodi-
carboxylate esters at C-50. While Jørgensen demonstrated
interesting catalytic activity in Michael additions to acro-
lein and in the amination of 2-naphthols, Deng found that
4a failed to promote the R-amination of a β-keto ester,
(5) (a) Marcelli, T.; van der Haas, R. N. S.; van Maarseveen, J.;
Hiemstra, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 929. (b) Hammar, P.;
Marcelli, T.; Hiemstra, H.; Himo, F. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 2537.
(6) Liu, Y.; Sun, B.; Wang, B.; Wakem, M.; Deng, L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2009, 131, 418.
(12) Reviews: (a) Schlosser, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37,
1496. (b) Smart, B. E. J. Fluorine Chem. 2001, 109, 3.
(13) For an example, see: Pierce, M. E.; Parsons, R. L., Jr.; Radesca,
L. A.; Lo, Y. S.; Silverman, S.; Moore, J. R.; Islam, Q.; Choudhury, A.;
Fortunak, J. M. D.; Nguyen, D.; Luo, C.; Morgan, S. J.; Davis, W. P.;
Confalone, P. M.; Chen, C. -Y.; Tillyer, R. D.; Frey, L.; Tan, L.; Xu, F.;
Zhao, D.; Thompson, A. S.; Corley, E. G. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 8536.
(7) Two examples of cinchona alkaloid-based catalysts substituted at
C-60 with phenyl and amide groups, respectively, have been reported;
€
€
see:(a) Waldmann, H.; Khedkar, V.; Duckert, H.; Schurmann, M.;
Oppel, I. M.; Kumar, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6869. (b)
Abermil, N.; Masson, G.; Zhu, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 12596.
(8) (a) Brandes, S.; Bella, M.; Kjoersgaard, A.; Jørgensen, K. A.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1147. (b) Brandes, S.; Niess, B.; Bella,
M.; Prieto, A.; Overgaard, J.; Jørgensen, K. A. Chem.;Eur. J. 2006, 12,
6039.
ꢀ
(14) Selected recent reviews: (a) Tur, F; Mansilla, J.; Lillo, V. J.; Saa,
J. M. Synthesis 2010, 1909. (b) Bella, M.; Gasperi, T. Synthesis 2009,
1583.(c) Cozzi, P. G.; Hilgraf, R.; Zimmermann, N. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2007, 5969. (d) Trost, B. M.; Jiang, C. Synthesis 2006, 369. (e) Christoffers,
J.; Baro, A. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2005, 347, 1473.
ꢀ
(15) Tur, F.; Saa, J. M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5079.
(9) Liu, X.; Sun, B.; Deng, L. Synlett 2009, 1685.
(16) Deng has demonstrated cupreine derivatives to be highly effec-
tive catalysts for the addition of nitromethane to R-ketoesters: Li, H.;
Wang, B.; Deng, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 732.
(17) Our group have had a particular interest in the use of (thio)ureas
to promote 1,2-addition reactions: (a) Maher, D. J.; Connon, S. J.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 1301. (b) Procuranti, B.; Connon, S. J. Chem.
Commun. 2007, 1421. (c) Peschiulli, A.; Gun’ko, Y.; Connon, S. J. J. Org.
Chem. 2008, 73, 2454. (d) Peschiulli, A.; Quigley, C.; Tallon, S.; Gun’ko,
Y. K.; Connon, S. J. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 6409. (e) Kavanagh, S. A.;
Piccinini, A.; Fleming, E. M.; Connon, S. J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6,
1339.
(10) For an early example illustrating the importance of the C-9
substituent in controlling catalyst conformation in cinchona alkaloid
systems, see: Cortez, G. S.; Oh, S. H.; Romo, D. Synthesis 2001, 1731.
(11) Deng has found that the C-9 substituent can play a key role in
determining catalyst efficacy in cupreine-type systems; for examples, see:
(a) Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Tang, L.; Wu, F.; Liu, X.; Guo, C.; Foxman, B. M.;
Deng, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 105. (b) Li, H.; Song, J.; Liu,
X.; Deng, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8948. (c) Wang, Y.; Liu, X.;
Deng, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 3928. (d) Wu, F.; Li, H.; Hong, R.;
Deng, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 947. (e) Wu, F.; Hong, R.;
Khan, J.; Liu, X.; Deng, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4301. (f) Li,
H.; Wang, B.; Deng, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 732.
(18) Bandini, M.; Sinisi, R.; Umani-Ronchi, A. Chem. Commun 2008,
4360.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 6, 2011
1299