also been reported that strongly basic, harsh conditions
and/or prolonged reaction times are in some cases necessary
for the selective formation of 2,6-cis-substituted tetrahydr-
opyrans.3a-c,8 On the other hand, acid-catalyzed IOCC of
R,β-unsaturated esters normally does not take place presum-
ably because of the low nucleophilicity of alcohols and
the low reactivity of R,β-unsaturated esters as conjugate
acceptors.6b,9,10
Recent biosynthetic studies have postulated that the
tetrahydropyrans of several polyketide natural products
would be formed via IOCC catalyzed by pyran synthase
(PS).11 As illustrated in Scheme 1a, the reaction is thought to
Inspired by the biosynthetic origin of tetrahydropyrans,
we envisioned that IOCC of R,β-unsaturated thioesters
based on carbonyl activation under acid catalysis would
represent a biomimetic methodology for the synthesis of 2,6-
cis-substituted tetrahydropyran derivatives (Scheme 1b).
We thought that this reaction would favor the formation
of synthetically useful 2,6-cis-substituted tetrahydropyrans
because its diastereoselectivity would depend on a late
transition model (vide infra). In addition, we expected that
the products of this reaction could be readily transformed
into a series of derivatives by exploiting the unique reactivity
of thioesters.
To test the viability of our idea, we first prepared a
variety of R,β-unsaturated thioesters 2a-f by exploiting
the olefin cross-metathesis reaction13,14 (Table 1). Treatment
Scheme 1. (a) Postulated Biosynthesis of Tetrahydropyrans of
Polyketide Natural Products and (b) Biomimetic Methodology
for Synthesis of 2,6-cis-Substituted Tetrahydropyrans
Table 1. Preparation of R,β-Unsaturated Thioesters
entry
R
yield/%
1
2
3
4
5
6
Et
2a: 93
2b: 94
2c: 92
2d: 82
2e: 94
2f: 87
Ph
p-MeC6H4
p-MeOC6H4
p-NO2C6H4
1-naphthyl
of hydroxy olefin 1 with an appropriate thioacrylate in the
presence of the Hoveyda-Grubbs second-generation cat-
alyst (HG-II)15 in CH2Cl2 at 35 °C provided 2a-f in high
yields. A brief investigation on the cyclization promoter
indicated that Brønsted acids, such as CSA, p-TsOH•H2O,
TFA, and CH3SO3H, were able to catalyze the cyclization,
while Lewis acids (e.g., MgBr2•OEt2, InCl3, Zn(OTf)2,
Cu(OTf)2, Sc(OTf)3, Yb(OTf)3) were uniformly ineffective
(no reaction or decomposition of the material).16 To probe
the reactivity of thioesters, 2a-f were individually exposed
occur during their polyketide biosynthesis; an R,β-unsatu-
rated thioester bound to an acyl carrier protein (ACP)
would be activated by a PS probably through hydrogen
bonding(s) and serve as an acceptor for the proximal
hydroxy group. We thought that the feasibility of the
biosynthetic formation of tetrahydropyrans would partly
stem from the enhanced reactivity of R,β-unsaturated thioe-
sters when compared with the corresponding oxoesters.12
(8) Micalizio, G. C.; Pinchuk, A. N.; Roush, W. R. J. Org. Chem.
2000, 65, 8730.
(12) There are only limited reports that describe the use of R,β-
unsaturated thioesters as conjugate acceptors. See: (a) Rigby, C. L.;
Dixon, D. J. Chem. Commun. 2008, 3798. (b) Mazery, R. D.; Pullez, M.;
(9) In contrast, IOCC of R,β-unsaturated ketones proceeds under
acidic conditions due to their high reactivity. For examples, see: (a)
Reddy, C. R.; Rao, N. N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 5840. (b) Bates,
R. W.; Song, P. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 4497. (c) Liu, J.; Yang, J. H.; Ko,
C.; Hsung, R. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 6121. (d) Chandrasekhar,
S.; Prakash, S. J.; Shyamsunder, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 6651. See
also ref 7b.
(10) A single example of acid-catalyzed IOCC of an R,β-unsaturated
ester, presumably promoted by the gem-dimethyl substitution effect, has
recently been reported. See: Hajare, A. K.; Ravikumar, V.; Khaleel, S.;
Bhuniya, D.; Reddy, D. S. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 963.
(11) (a) Irschik, H.; Kopp, M.; Weissman, K. J.; Buntin, K.; Piel, J.;
ꢀ
Lopez, F.; Harutyunyan, S. R.; Minnaard, A. J.; Feringa, B. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9966. (c) Bandini, M.; Melloni, A.; Tommasi, S.;
Umani-Ronchi, A. Helv. Chim. Acta 2003, 86, 3753. (d) Agapiou, K.;
Krische, M. J. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1737. (e) Keck, G. E.; Welch, D. S. Org.
Lett. 2002, 4, 3687. (f) Emori, E.; Arai, T.; Sasai, H.; Shibasaki, M. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4043.
(13) For a review on the olefin cross-metathesis reaction, see: Con-
non, S. J.; Blechert, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1900.
(14) Van Zijl, A. W.; Minnaard, A. J.; Feringa, B. L. J. Org. Chem.
2008, 73, 5651.
(15) Garber, S. B.; Kingsbury, J. S.; Gray, B. L.; Hoveyda, A. H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8168.
(16) Spencer et al. have reported that hetero-Michael reactions are
actually catalyzed by protons. See: Wabnitz, T. C.; Yu, J,-Q.; Spencer,
J. B. Chem.;Eur. J. 2004, 10, 484.
€
Muller, R. ChemBioChem 2010, 11, 1840. (b) Sudek, S.; Lopanik, N. B.;
Waggoner, L. E.; Hildebrand, M.; Anderson, C.; Liu, H.; Patel, A.;
Sherman, D. H.; Haygood, M. G. J. Nat. Prod. 2007, 70, 67. (c) Julien,
B.; Tian, Z.-Q.; Reid, R.; Reeves, C. D. Chem. Biol. 2006, 13, 1277. (d)
Piel, J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 14002.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 7, 2011
1821