H.-L. Huang et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 3998–4003
4003
was shortened to 5–10 min for optimization test [Fig. 6(D and E)].
Supplementary data
Whereas the tumor lesion was still dark and the cold spot was sim-
ilar to that of 18 week rat. From the above comparisons, the opti-
mized imaging sampling times appears to be 0–30 min. These
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found,
results suggest that regulation of GST-a synthesis was disturbed.
A work reported by Ling et al. has addressed a similar finding of de-
creased synthesis of GST-a during the process of hepatocarcinogen-
References and notes
esis.29 Although the cytotoxicity of the nonradioactive FBuEA 3
against A549 might imply its preferential accumulation in tumors
through GST catalysis and the corresponding radioactive
1. Hayes, J. D.; Pulfor, D. J. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1995, 30(6), 445.
2. Sies, H.; Packer, L. Human alpha class glutathione S-transferase genetic
polymorphism, expression, and susceptibility to disease In Methods in
Enzymology; Coles, B. F., Kadlubar, F. F., Eds.; Elsevier Academic Press: San
Diego, USA, 2005; Vol. 41, p 9.
3. Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. Classification of primary liver cancer. 1st
English ed. Tokyo: Kanehara Shuppan, 1997.
4. Shaib, Y.; El-Serag, H. B. Semin. Liver Dis. 2004, 24, 115.
[
18F]FBuEA 3 displaced a hot spot, another cytotoxic mechanism
via Wnt signaling pathway could also be involved.20 The level of
expression of GST, specifically GST- , might be negatively corre-
lated to that of Wnt signaling proteins.
a
5. Shaib, Y. H.; Davila, J. A.; McGlynn, K.; El-Serag, H. B. J. Hepatol. 2004, 40, 472.
6. Patel, T. BMC Cancer 2002, 2, 10.
7. Chang, K. Y.; Chang, J. Y.; Yen, Y. J. Natl. Compr. Canc. Netw. 2009, 7, 423.
8. Yeh, C. N.; Lin, K. J.; Hsiao, I. T.; Yen, T. C.; Chen, T. W.; Jan, Y. Y.; Chung, Y. H.;
Lin, C. F.; Chen, M. F. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2008, 10, 209.
Whereas the current cold spot prevents its use from tracing the
metastasis to other organs, [18F]FBuEA 3 might be capable of
assessing the liver function based on GST activity. For example,
the clinical efficacy of current chemotherapeutic drugs, for exam-
ple, mephalan and temozolomide by exerting their cytotoxicities
via alkylation mechanism is inevitably retarded by GST of the liver.
Liver cancer or other types of cancers with low GST activity might
be suitable for treatment with this type of drugs.
9. Townsend, D. M.; Tew, K. D. Oncogene 2003, 22, 7369.
10. McIlwain, C. C.; Townsend, D. M.; Tew, K. D. Oncogene 2006, 25, 1639.
11. Chiang, L.-W.; Pei, K.; Chen, S.-W.; Huang, H.-L.; Lin, K.-J.; Yen, T.-C.; Yu, C.-S.
Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2009, 57, 714.
12. Wang, K.; Li, C.; Song, D.; Zhao, G.; Zhao, L.; Jing, Y. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 7856.
13. Su, Y. H.; Chiang, L. W.; Jeng, K.-C.; Huang, H.-L.; Chen, J.-T.; Lin, W.-J.; Huang,
C.-W.; Yu, C.-S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 1320.
In brief, the radiolabeled compound [18F]FBuEA 3 was prepared
based on an initial cellular-based screening of a library of ethacry-
nic acid-derived amide formation products using solution phase
14. Unpublished results. IC50 of FBuEA against MCF7 and A549 were 3 and 8
l
M,
parallel assay: IC50 of FBuEA against A549 and IMR-90
control) were 21 and 18 M, respectively. IC50 of BuEA
M, respectively.
respectively.
A
(fibroblast as
a
l
parallel synthesis.30 18F]FBuEA 3 was prepared via the nucleo-
[
philic radiofluorination of the precursor tosylate 8, from ethacrynic
acid via a 4-step synthesis. A sufficient radiochemical yield of 3%
and specific activity of 48 GBq/lmol was obtained from these pro-
cedures. The liver is the major organ for the tracer uptake, and glu-
tathione and GST enzymes play a role in the metabolism of this
tracer. An in vivo half-life of 46 min for [18F]FBuEA 3 obtained from
a preliminary in vivo stability test for [18F]FBuEA 3 is shorter than
the half-life of 18F. The adequate clearance rate is capable of pro-
viding an acceptable contrasting image for the TAA-treated CCA
rat. [18F]FBuEA 3 was found to be accumulated homogeneously
in the liver of normal rat using PET. However, an extraordinary
change in the liver image was observed in the CCA rat at the early
stage of tumor development and suggested its diagnostic potential.
against MCF7 and A549 were 4 and 13
l
15. Miller, P. W.; Long, N. J.; Vilar, R.; Gee, A. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47,
8998.
16. Li, Z.; Conti, P. S. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2010, 62, 1031.
17. Tolmachev, V.; Stone-Elander, S. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Gen. Subj. 2010, 1800,
487.
18. Lee, S.; Xie, J.; Chen, X. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 3087.
19. Krivickas, S. J.; Tamanini, E.; Todd, M. H.; Watkinson, M. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72,
8280.
20. Jin, G.; Lu, D.; Yao, S.; Wu, C. C. N.; Liu, J. X.; Carson, D. A.; Cottam, H. B. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 606.
21. Yu, C.-S.; Oberdorfer, F. Synthesis 1999, 2057.
22. Shi, B. L.; Stevenson, R.; Campopiano, D. J.; Greaney, M. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2006, 128, 8459.
23. Berndt, M.; Pietzsch, J.; Wuest, F. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2007, 34, 5.
24. Wuest, F.; Hultsch, C.; Bergmann, R.; Johannsen, B.; Henle, T. Appl. Rad. Isot.
2003, 59, 43.
25. Lo, W.-J.; Chiou, Y.-C.; Hsu, Y.-T.; Lam, W.-S.; Chang, M.-Y.; Jao, S.-C.; Li, W.-S.
Bioconjugate Chem. 2007, 18, 109.
26. Tracqui, A.; Kintz, P.; Mangin, P. Systematic toxicological analysis using HPLC/
DAD. In HPLC method for pharmaceutical analysis; George, L., Norman, S., Eds.;
Wiley-Interscience Press: New York, USA, 1997; p 35.
27. Uddin, M. J.; Crews, B. C.; Blobaum, A. L.; Kingsley, P. J.; Gorden, D. L.; McIntyre,
J. O.; Matrisian, L. M.; Subbaramaiah, K.; Dannenberg, A. J.; Piston, D. W.;
Marnett, L. J. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 3618.
28. Hardman, J. G.; Goodman, G. A.; Limbird, L. E. In Goodman and Gilman’s The
pharmacological basis of therapeutics, 9th ed.; McGraw-Hill Companies:
Southern California, 1996.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the National Science Council of Taiwan,
CGMH_NTHU Joint Research and Chang-Gung Medical Research
Project for providing financial support of the Grant numbers of
NSC-98-2113-M-007-012, NSC-97-2314-B-182A-020-MY3, CGTH9
6N2342E1, CMRPG390931, CMRPG391512 and CMRPG3B0361.
Technical assistance by Mr. Yean-Hung Tu and Ms. Li-Yuan Huang
are acknowledged. We acknowledge Dr. Shui-Tein Chen from
Institute of Biological Chemistry at Academia Sinica for his review
of this manuscript.
29. Ling, L.; Higashi, T.; Tsuchida, S.; Sato, K.; Tsuji, T. Acta Med. Okayama 1993, 47,
293.
30. Boger, D. L.; Desharnais, J.; Capps, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4138.