Ï
B. Grzeta et al. / Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 63 >2002) 765±772
766
Higher amount of antimony caused a separation of the
system into two phases, Sb2O4 and SnO2, respectively.
Studying the crystallization of amorphous Sb±Sn±O thin
®lms sprayed onto glass substrates, Kojima et al. [10]
found a non-linear increase of the lattice parameters of the
crystal ;cassiterite) phase, which they attributed to the
presence of antimony in two different oxidation states,
Sb31 and Sb51 [11]. However, they proved the coexistence
of both antimony oxidation states only by blackening of the
®lms heat-treated at 5008C. Crnjak-Orel et al. [4] also
observed the non-linear dependence of the lattice para-
meters of antimony-doped cassiterite on the antimony
content. Terrier et al. [12] tried to determine the actual
doping level of Sb in the doped SnO2 ®lms, and also the
oxidation state of incorporated antimony, by means of X-ray
photoelectron spectroscopy ;XPS) and secondary ion mass
spectroscopy ;SIMS). They found that in doping the Sb31
overcame the Sb51 content, but they could not ascertain the
exact content of antimony for which this occurred. The
present paper reports the preparation of powder samples
of SnO2 containing antimony in amounts up to 14.0 at%
Sb and their structural characterization. Locating antimony
in the cassiterite structure was achieved by means of
Prepared powder samples were characterized by X-ray
diffraction ;XRD) at room temperature ;RT) using a Philips
MPD 1880 counter diffractometer with monochromatized
Cu Ka radiation. The following data sets were collected:
;i) XRD patterns of the samples S0±S4 mixed with silicon
powder ;99.999%, Koch-Light Lab. Ltd., UK) as an internal
standard, scanned in steps of 0.028 ;2 u) in the 2 u range
from 10 to 1008 with a ®xed counting time of 5 s, for the
purpose of precise determination of unit-cell parameters, ;ii)
XRD patterns of pure samples S0, S2 and S3 scanned in
steps of 0.068 ;2 u) in the 2 u range from 10 to 1408 with
a ®xed counting time of 10 s, for the purpose of the Rietveld
structure re®nement [14].
121
The 119Sn- and Sb Mossbauer spectroscopy was per-
formed for determination of the oxidation state of tin and
È
119
È
antimony in the samples.
Sn Mossbauer spectra were
È
recorded at RT by a conventional transmission Mossbauer
spectrometer ;Topological System Co.) using a Ca119mSnO3
source ;37 MBq) and a NaI;Tl) scintilation detector. 121Sb
È
È
Mossbauer spectra were measured by a Wissel Mossbauer
spectometer system using a Ca121mSnO3 source ;16 MBq)
and a germanium solid-state detector; in these measure-
ments both the source and the samples containing antimony
were kept at 12 K in a cryostat incorporating a closed-cycle
refrigerator [15].
È
the Mossbauer spectroscopy and the Rietveld structure
re®nement.
2.3. Data processing
2. Experimental procedure
The XRD data of samples with admixed silicon powder
were employed for precise determination of unit-cell para-
meters. The method proposed by Toraya [16] was used.
Bragg angle positions, 2 u, of seven diffraction lines of the
examined sample and of three diffraction lines of silicon
were determined by the individual pro®le ®tting method
;program PROFIT [17]) and taken as input data for the
program UNITCELL [16]. The polynomial model of the
peak shift correction function was applied. Then, the unit-
cell parameters were re®ned by the whole-powder-pattern
®tting method using the program WPPF [17]. The ®tting
was performed using the split-type pseudo-Voigt pro®le
function and the polynomial background model. Aniso-
tropic line broadening was taken into account in the ®tting
procedure. The starting line pro®le parameters for the lines
hk0 and h00 were different from those for h0l and 00l lines
and from those for hkl lines, respectively.
2.1. Sample preparation
The powder samples of pure SnO2 and ones doped with
antimony in the amounts of 3.1, 6.2, 11.9 and 14.0 at% ;the
samples S0±S4) were prepared using a sol±gel technique
followed by hydrothermal treatment. A solution of tin;IV)
chloride in ethanol containing various amounts of SbCl3 was
added dropwise to an aqueous ammonia solution containing
10 wt.% of the surface modifying agent, b-alanine, with
respect to the oxide. The suspensions were treated at
1508C for 3 h. The resulting powders were isolated by
centrifuging and washed with deionized water several
times and after that hydrothermally treated at 2508C and
2.5 MPa. The samples were light yellow coloured except
of pure SnO2 which was white.
2.2. Methods
The crystal structures of the samples S0, S2 and S3 were
re®ned by the Rietveld method [14]. A starting structure
model for S0 was the structure of cassiterite, reported for
the single crystal by Baur [1]: space group P42/mnm, Sn41
on 2 ;a) sites, ;0, 0, 0; 1/2, 1/2, 1/2), and O22 on 4 ; f) sites,
^;x, x, 0; 1/2 1 x, 1/2 2 x, 1/2), with x 0.307. In this
structure, the six oxygen atoms about Sn form the octa-
hedron in which four Sn±O distances are slightly different
from the other two. For the Sb-doped samples, S2 and S3, a
cassiterite structure model was used in which a portion of
The antimony concentrations in the samples were
determined by means of both the atomic emission spectro-
scopy, using a Jobin Yvon JY24 spectrometer, and PIXE
;Particle Induced X-ray Emission) spectroscopy, using a
nuclear microprobe facility with a 3 MeV proton beam
and a semiconductor Si;Li) X-ray detector [13]. The
K-series of emitted X-ray radiation from thin powder
samples was used for the analysis. The results of atomic
emission spectroscopy and of PIXE analysis were equal
within the experimental error.
Sn41 ions was substituted by antimony ions, Sb31 and Sb51
.