76
K. Okuyama et al.
LETTER
(3) (a) Smith, N. D.; Hayashida, J.; Rawal, V. H. Org. Lett.
2005, 7, 4309. (b) Grundl, M. A.; Trauner, D. Org. Lett.
2006, 8, 23. (c) Wipf, P.; Furegati, M. Org. Lett. 2006, 8,
1901. (d) Jeong, J. H.; Weinreb, S. M. Org. Lett. 2006, 8,
2309. (e) Fürstner, A.; Ackerstaff, J. Chem. Commun. 2008,
2870. (f) Taniguchi, T.; Zaimoku, H.; Ishibashi, H. J. Org.
Chem. 2009, 74, 2624.
(4) (a) Baran, P. S.; Burns, N. Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
3908. (b) Burns, N. Z.; Baran, P. S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2008, 47, 205. (c) Burns, N. Z.; Krylova, I. N.; Hannoush,
R. N.; Baran, P. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 9172.
(d) Burns, N. Z.; Jessing, M.; Baran, P. S. Tetrahedron 2009,
65, 6600.
(5) (a) Fürstner, A.; Jumbam, D. N. Tetrahedron 1992, 48,
5991. (b) Fürstner, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1993,
32, 164. (c) Fürstner, A.; Bogdanović, B. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 2442.
(6) (a) Cogan, D. A.; Liu, G.; Kim, K.; Backes, B. J.; Ellman,
J. A. J. Am Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8011. (b) Weix, D. J.;
Ellman, J. A. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1317. (c) Ellman, J. A.;
Owens, T. D.; Tang, T. P. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 984.
(7) Wang, Y.; He, Q.-F.; Wang, H.-W.; Zhou, X.; Huang, Z.-Y.;
Qin, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 1588.
(8) The relative stereochemistry was determined after
derivatization to b-lactam 18. The absolute stereochemistry
was tentatively assigned according to the Qin’s proposed
transition state (ref. 7).
(9) (a) Wentrup, C.; Winter, H.-W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980,
102, 6161. (b) DeMattei, J. A.; Leanna, M. R.; Li, W.;
Nichols, P. J.; Rasmussen, M. W.; Morton, H. E. J. Org.
Chem. 2001, 66, 3330.
(10) The ee was determined by HPLC (Daicel CHIRALCEL
OD-H, flow rate: 0.50 mL/min, hexane-i-PrOH = 80:20, tR =
10.0, 13.1 min).
(11) The stereochemistry was tentatively assigned as described
based on the general reactivity of 4-substituted azetidine 2,3-
dione. For a typical example, see: Kant, J.; Schwartz, W. S.;
Fairchild, C.; Gao, Q.; Huang, S.; Long, B. H.; Kadow, J. F.;
Langley, D. R.; Farina, V.; Vyas, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996,
37, 6495.
evacuated and backfilled with argon gas. To the flask was
added anhyd MeCN (20 mL), and the resulting solution was
cooled to –40 °C. To the solution was added TfOH (0.70 mL,
7.9 mmol) at –40 °C. The reaction mixture was warmed to
r.t. and stirred for 3 h, after which time TLC (hexanes–
EtOAc, 3:2) indicated complete consumption of the starting
mesylate. After cooling to 0 °C, the reaction mixture was
treated with sat. aq NaHCO3, and the mixture was extracted
with EtOAc (3 ×). The combined organic extracts were
concentrated under reduced pressure to give the crude
material, which was purified by column chromatography on
silica gel to provide the title compound 23 (495 mg, 1.19
mmol, 74% over 2 steps) as a pale yellow amorphous solid;
[a]D23 –67.8 (c = 1.15, CHCl3). IR (neat): 2939, 2835, 1747,
1601, 1489, 1456, 1339, 1151, 1078, 1047, 910, 733, 698
cm–1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d = 7.20–7.37 (m, 6 H),
6.88–6.95 (m, 2 H), 6.76–6.81 (m, 1 H), 6.31–6.35 (m, 2 H),
4.66 (d, 1 H, J = 15.2 Hz), 4.23 (d, 1 H, J = 15.2 Hz), 4.02
(d, 1 H, J = 6.4 Hz), 3.79 (s, 3 H), 3.76 (s, 3 H), 3.63 (s, 3 H),
2.99 (dd, 1 H, J = 17.6, 6.4 Hz), 2.87 (d, 1 H, J = 17.6 Hz).
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d = 169.8, 161.9, 159.5, 158.3,
144.9, 139.0, 136.0, 129.2, 128.7, 128.1, 127.6, 120.8,
119.1, 112.5, 112.4, 102.0, 98.1, 75.4, 65.3, 55.7, 55.5, 55.1,
43.7, 32.8. HRMS (ESI+): m/z [M + Na+] calcd for
C26H25NO4Na: 438.1681; found: 438.1674.
(14) (a) D’Annibale, A.; Pesce, A.; Resta, S.; Trogolo, C.
Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 13129. (b) Bhalla, A.; Madan, S.;
Venugopalan, P.; Bari, S. S. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 5054.
(15) Procedure for the Intramolecular McMurry Coupling
Reaction: A 10-mL test tube equipped with a magnetic
stirrer bar and an inlet adapter with three-way stopcock was
charged with Zn/Cu (6.2 mg, 95 mmol). The flask was flame-
dried and backfilled with argon gas. To the flask was added
degassed anyhd 1,2-dimethoxyethane (0.18 mL), and the
resulting suspension was cooled to 0 °C. To the suspension
was added TiCl4 (4.0 mL, 36 mmol), and the mixture was
heated at 90 °C for 1.5 h. After the flask was cooled to 0 °C,
substrate 6 (2.0 mg, 3.5 mmol) in 1,2-dimethoxyethane (50
mL) was added to the flask. The reaction mixture was
warmed to r.t. over 30 min and then heated at 90 °C for 2 h,
after which time TLC (hexanes–EtOAc, 1:1) indicated
complete consumption of the starting material. After cooling
to r.t., the mixture was diluted with EtOAc and filtered
through a celite pad. The filtrate was concentrated under
reduced pressure to give the crude material, which was
purified by preparative TLC providing the title compound 5
(0.42 mg, 0.78 mmol, 22%) as a colorless film. IR (neat):
3302, 2934, 1674, 1599, 1470, 1337, 1290, 1207, 1150, 754
cm–1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d = 7.45 (d, 1 H, J = 8.8
Hz), 7.21–7.26 (m, 1 H), 6.91 (d, 1 H, J = 2.4 Hz), 6.78–6.86
(m, 3 H), 6.75 (dd, 1 H, J = 8.8, 3.2 Hz), 6.66 (s, 1 H), 6.48
(d, 1 H, J = 2.0 Hz), 6.36 (d, 1 H, J = 2.0 Hz), 5.66 (s, 1 H),
4.14–4.21 (m, 1 H), 3.83 (s, 3 H), 3.79 (s, 3 H), 3.76 (s, 3 H),
3.59 (s, 3 H), 3.33 (dd, 1 H, J = 16.0, 7.6 Hz), 3.08–3.16 (m,
1 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): d = 163.4, 161.7, 159.8,
158.8, 157.2, 145.1, 143.9, 141.1, 138.9, 134.0, 133.0,
129.3, 122.3, 119.1, 117.2, 115.0, 114.4, 112.9, 112.0,
101.2, 98.3, 77.2, 64.6, 55.6, 55.5, 55.2, 55.1, 41.2. HRMS
(ESI+): m/z [M + Na+] calcd for C28H2679BrNO5Na:
(12) We found that the hydroxyl group should be activated as a
mesylate for the smooth and high-yielding process. The O-
methylated substrate has a low reactivity, and degradation of
the starting material was observed. On the contrary, The O-
triflated substrate was found to be unstable.
(13) Procedure for the Intramolecular Friedel–Crafts
Alkylation: A 30-mL round-bottomed flask equipped with a
magnetic stirrer bar and an inlet adapter with three-way
stopcock was charged with tertiary alcohol 21 (740 mg, 1.62
mmol). The flask was evacuated and backfilled with argon
gas. To the flask was added anhyd CH2Cl2 (6.0 mL), and the
resulting solution was cooled to 0 °C. To the solution were
added Et3N (0.70 mL, 5.0 mmol) and methanesulfonyl
chloride (0.25 mL, 3.2 mmol) at 0 °C, respectively. The
reaction mixture was then warmed to r.t. and stirred for 8 h,
after which time TLC (hexanes–EtOAc, 1:1) indicated
complete consumption of the starting alcohol. The reaction
was quenched with sat. aq NH4Cl, and the mixture was
extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 ×). The combined organic extracts
were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and filtered. The
filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure to give a
crude mesylate (1.1 g), which was used for the next reaction.
A 30-mL round-bottomed flask equipped with a magnetic
stirrer bar and an inlet adapter with three-way stopcock was
charged with the crude mesylate (1.1 g). The flask was
558.0892; found: 558.0873.
(16) Reduction of the amide is reported using a similar compound
by Weinreb (ref. 3d).
(17) Chemical shifts of 1H NMR and 13C NMR of 5 were in
excellent agreement with those of the analogous compound
reported by Weinreb (ref. 3d).
Synlett 2011, No. 1, 73–76 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York