546
S.L. Lai et al. / Organic Electronics 12 (2011) 541–546
Table 2
Electroluminescence performance of BPyC and TPyC-based devices. Device configurations: ITO/BPyC (100 nm)/TPBI (20 nm)/LiF (0.5 nm)/Al (100 nm); ITO/NPB
(70 nm)/BPyC (30 nm)/TPBI (20 nm)/LiF (0.5 nm)/Al (100 nm); ITO/TPyC (100 nm)/TPBI (20 nm)/LiF (0.5 nm)/Al (100 nm); ITO/NPB (70 nm)/TPyC (30 nm)/TPBI
(20 nm)/LiF (0.5 nm)/Al (100 nm).
Device
Vturn-on (V)
V at 20 mA cmꢀ2 (V)
gC (cd Aꢀ1
)
gP (lm Wꢀ1
)
gE (%)
CIE (x, y)
BPyC
NPB/BPyC
TPyC
2.7
2.7
2.9
2.8
3.65
3.48
4.58
4.34
4.25
2.94
3.76
6.42
4.45
2.72
3.34
5.34
2.49
2.21
2.01
3.11
0.17, 0.25
0.15, 0.18
0.21, 0.26
0.22, 0.29
NPB/TPyC
thin-films are now under investigation. Nevertheless, the
discrepancy of UPL on the device performance is in consis-
tent with our previous study [8] and underscores the
importance of high UPL in organic materials for achieving
highly efficient exciplex-based OLEDs. Characteristics of
all BPyC- and TPyC-based devices are summarized in
Table 2.
exciplex emission. By employing the carbazole derivatives
as emitters in contact with the electron-transporting TPBI,
both devices exhibit distinct EL properties. Particularly, the
TPyC-based devices display two emission peaks with CIE
coordinates of (0.22, 0.29); while the BPyC-based devices
show a single blue emission peak with CIE coordinates of
(0.15, 0.18). More importantly, a relatively high gE of
3.11% can be obtained for the TPyC-based device. This dis-
crepancy on the device performance is attributed to the
substitution of t-butyl unit of BPyC with a pyrenyl group,
resulting in an increase on the degree of electron-donating
property and hence the presence of exciplex emission at
the HTL/ETL heterojunction.
It is interesting to note that, in our previous study, the
use of a better ETL (i.e., BPhen) would effectively increase
the intensity of exciplex emission and, in turns, results in
a better balanced white emission. In particular, the CIE
coordinates change from (0.18, 0.25) for devices with TPBI
as ETL to (0.31, 0.35) for the BPhen-based TPyPA device. In
addition, the replacement of BPhen results in a high gE of
3.93%, much higher than that of the TPBI-based device
(2.83%). These enhancements have been attributed to the
different carrier mobility of BPhen and TPBI. Indeed, the
intensity of exciplex emission is determined by the charge
accumulation densities, which in turns depends on the rel-
ative hole mobility and electron mobility in HTL and ETL. In
particular, the use of ETL with higher electron mobility
would lead to higher exciplex emission intensity. As the
electron mobility in TPBI is two orders of magnitude lower
than that in BPhen, the relatively small electron mobility in
TPBI would inevitably reduce the number of electron–hole
pairs formed for exciplex emission, and in turns leads to a
weak exciplex emission. However, it is not the case in our
present study, in which there is only a mild shift on the CIE
coordinates from (0.22, 0.29) to (0.25, 0.33) and a small in-
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Research Grants Coun-
cil of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
(Project No. CityU 101508). Q.X. Tong thanks his financial
supports from the National Science Foundation of China
(No. 91027041) and the Key Laboratory of Photochemical
Conversion and Optoelectronic Materials, TIPC, CAS.
References
[1] S. Reineke, F. Lindner, G. Schwartz, N. Seidler, K. Walzer, B. Lüssem, K.
Leo, Nature (London) 459 (2009) 234.
[2] M.H. Ho, S.F. Hsu, J.W. Ma, S.W. Hwang, P.C. Yeh, C.H. Chen, Appl.
Phys. Lett. 91 (2007) 113518.
[3] S. Chen, Z. Wu, Y. Zhao, C. Li, J. Hou, S. Liu, Org. Electron. 6 (2005)
111.
[4] C. Giebeler, H. Antoniadis, D.D.C. Bradley, Y. Shirota, J. Appl. Phys. 85
(1999) 608.
[5] K. Okumoto, Y. Shirota, J. Lumin. 87 (2000) 1171.
[6] Y. Kawabe, J. Abe, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81 (2002) 493.
[7] L.C. Palilis, A.J. Mäkinen, M. Uchida, Z.H. Kafafi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82
(2003) 2209.
[8] S.L. Lai, M.Y. Chan, Q.X. Tong, M.K. Fung, P.F. Wang, C.S. Lee, S.T. Lee,
Appl. Phys. Lett. 93 (2008) 143301.
[9] J. Thompson, R.I.R. Blyth, M. Mazzeo, M. Anni, G. Gigli, R. Cingolani,
Appl. Phys. Lett. 79 (2001) 560.
[10] G. Li, C.H. Kim, Z. Zhou, J. Shinar, K. Okumoto, Y. Shirota, Appl. Phys.
Lett. 88 (2006) 253505.
[11] R.D. Fossum, M.A. Fox, J. Phys. Chem. B 101 (1997) 6384.
[12] S.L. Lin, L.H. Chan, R.H. Lee, M.Y. Yen, W.J. Kuo, C.T. Chen, R.J. Jeng,
Adv. Mater. (Weinheim, Ger.) 20 (2008) 3947.
[13] J.N. Demas, G.A. Crosby, J. Phys. Chem. 75 (1971) 991.
[14] J.F. Ambrose, L.L. Carpenter, R.F. Nelson, J. Electrochem. Soc. 122
(1975) 876.
[15] G.L. Feng, S.J. Ji, W.Y. Lai, W. Huang, Synlett 17 (2006) 2841.
[16] N. Miyaura, A. Suzuki, Chem. Rev. 95 (1995) 2457.
[17] Y. Shirota, Y. Kuwabara, H. Inada, T. Wakimoto, H. Nakada, Y.
Yonemoto, S. Kawami, K. Imai, Appl. Phys. Lett. 65 (1994) 807.
[18] S. Tao, Z. Peng, X. Zhang, P. Wang, C.S. Lee, S.T. Lee, Adv. Funct. Mater.
15 (2005) 1716.
crease on gE from 3.11% to 3.16% when the ETL is replaced
by BPhen. Such minor device performance improvement
for the TPyC-based devices may be ascribed by the lower
mobility in TPyC than that in TPyPA. Particularly, it is ex-
pected that the hole mobility of TPyC is much lower than
that of TPyPA, and thus the use of better electron-trans-
porting materials, e.g., BPhen, would not result in a dra-
matic increase on the interfacial charge accumulation
density at the HTL/ETL interface. It is also the reason for
the larger driving voltage for the TPyC-based devices. For
instance, to generate a current density of 20 mA cmꢀ2
,
the driving voltages of the TPyC-based device with TPBI
or BPhen as ETL are 4.34 and 3.76 V, respectively, while
those of the TPyPA-based device with TPBI or BPhen as
ETL are 3.60 and 3.31 V, respectively [8].
4. Conclusions
[19] W.J. Shen, R. Dodda, C.C. Wu, F.I. Wu, T.H. Liu, H.H. Chen, C.H. Chen,
C.F. Shu, Chem. Mater. 16 (2004) 930.
[20] K.C. Wu, P.J. Ku, C.S. Lin, H.T. Shih, F.I. Wu, M.J. Huang, J.J. Lin, I.C.
Chen, C.H. Cheng, Adv. Funct. Mater. 18 (2008) 67.
We have designed and synthesized two carbazole–pyr-
ene based fluorophores, namely BPyC and TPyC, to investi-
gate how chemical structures of organic materials affecting