Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Article
mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4) and the reaction started with
addition of excess NADPH (8 mg/mL, 50 mM potassium phosphate
buffer, pH 7.4). Immediately, at time zero, then at 3, 6, 9, 15, and 30 min,
an aliquot (50 μL) of the incubation mixture was removed and mixed
with acetonitrile (100 μL) to stop the reaction. Internal standard was
added to all samples, and the samples were centrifuged at 1825g for 10
min to sediment precipitated protein. The plates were then sealed prior
to UPLC/MS/MS analysis using a Quattro Premier XE (Waters
Corporation, USA).
XLfit (IDBS, UK) was used to calculate the exponential decay and
consequently the rate constant (k) from the ratio of peak area of test
compound to internal standard at each time point. The rate of intrinsic
clearance (Clint) of each compound was then calculated using the
following eq 2:
analyzed under a UV lamp (UV 254/365 nm) and/or KMnO4 was used
for visualization. Flash column chromatography was performed on an
automated purification system (Teledyne ISCO Combiflash Com-
panion or Combiflash Retrieve) using Grace Resolve prepacked silica gel
cartridges (230−400 mesh, 40−63 μm, varying sizes depending on
1
reaction scale). H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker
Advance II 500 spectrometer operating at 500.1 and 125.8 MHz (unless
otherwise stated) using CDCl3 or DMSO-d6 solutions. Chemical shifts
(δ) are expressed in ppm recorded using the residual solvent as the
internal reference in all cases. Signal splitting patterns are described as
singlet (s), doublet (d), triplet (t), multiplet (m), broadened (b), or a
combination thereof. Coupling constants (J) are quoted to the nearest
0.1 Hz (Hz). LC-MS analyses were performed with either an Agilent
HPLC 1100 series connected to a Bruker Daltonics MicroTOF or an
Agilent Technologies 1200 series HPLC connected to an Agilent
Technologies 6130 quadrupole spectrometer, where both instruments
were connected to an agilent diode array detector. LC-MS chromato-
graphic separations were conducted with a Water Xbridge C18 column,
50 mm × 2.1 mm, 3.5 μm particle size, using either methanol, methanol/
water (95:5), or water/acetonitrile (1:1) + 0.1% formic acid as the
mobile phase; linear gradient from 80:20 to 5:95 over 3.5 min and then
held for 1.5 min; flow rate of 0.5 mL min−1. All synthesized compounds
were determined to be of >95% purity by the LC-MS method (TIC and
UV) as determined using this analytical LC-MS system. High resolution
electrospray measurements were performed on a Bruker MicroTof mass
spectrometer. Microwave-assisted chemistry was performed using a
Biotage Initiator microwave synthesizer.
General Procedure A: Synthesis of Diamides from Indoline-2-
carboxylic Acid (Scheme 1). To a solution of R1CO2H (1 mol equiv) in
DCM (anhydrous, 5 mL mmol−1) at room temperature, O-
(benzotriazol-1-yl)-N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyluronium tetrafluoroborate
(TBTU) (1 mol equiv) was added and the reaction mixture stirred
for 30 min, indoline-2-carboxylic acid (1 mol equiv) was then added and
the reaction mixture stirred for 2 h. The progress of the reaction was
monitored by LCMS; after successful coupling of the first amide, a
further 1 equiv of TBTU was added to the reaction mixture and the
mixture stirred for 30 min, methylamine (2 M in MeOH or 2 M in THF,
5 mol equiv) was added, and the reaction mixture stirred for a further 1 h
or until complete consumption of the starting material was observed.
The reaction was quenched with H2O, passed through a hydrophobic
frit, and the organic layer concentrated in vacuo. Column chromatog-
raphy eluting with ether afforded the desired diamides.
(R)-1-(2-(4-Chlorophenoxy)acetyl)-N-methylindoline-2-carboxa-
mide (27). Prepared using general procedure A, colorless solid, 207 mg,
67%. δH (500 MHz, CDCl3) 8.21 (bs, 1H, NH), 7.30−7.26 (m, 5H,
ArH), 7.15 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, ArH), 6.91 (dd, J = 6.9 and 2.2 Hz, 2H,
ArH), 5.79 and 5.06 (2 × bs, rotomer, 1H, CH2), 5.28 and 4.75 (2 × bs,
rotomer, 2H, CH2), 3.68 (bs, 1H, CH2), 3.30 (bs, 1H, CH2), 2.76 (bd,
rotomer, 3H, CH3). δC (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) 171.0, 165.9 (CO),
156.9, 142.8, 129.6, 129.0, 127.1, 124.6, 124.5, 123.7, 116.2 (ArC), 66.0,
59.6, 34.5, 25.9. LCMS (ES+): m/z (%) 345 [M + H]+. tR: 4.17 (20−
95% MeCN, acidic). HRMS (ES+) calcd for [C18H18ClN2O3 + H],
345.1000; found, 345.0988.
(R)-1-(2-(4-Fluorophenyl)acetyl)-N-methylindoline-2-carboxa-
mide (47). Prepared using general procedure A, colorless solid, 339 mg,
54%. δH (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) 8.28 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 1H, NH), 8.05 (d, J =
8.1 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.28−7.26 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.21 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H,
ArH), 7.17−7.13 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.01 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, ArH), 5.11 (d, J
= 8.7 Hz, 1H, CH), 3.78 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.59 (dd, J = 16.5 and
11.3 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.47 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.06 (d, J = 16.5, 1H,
CH2), 2.65 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 3H, CH3). δC (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) = 171.4
(CO), 169.3 (CO), 131.6, 131.85, 131.2, 130.0, 127.0, 124.4,
123.4, 116.3, 114.9, 114.7 (ArC), 60.9, 34.1, 25.8. LCMS (ES+): m/z
(%) 313 [M + H]+. tR: 3.90 (20−95% MeCN, acidic). HRMS (ES+)
calcd for [C18H18FN2O2 + H], 313.1347; found, 313.1335.
Clint (mL min−1 g−1 liver) = k × V × microsomal protein yield
(2)
where V (mL/mg protein) is the incubation volume/mg protein added
and microsomal protein yield is taken as 52.5 mg protein/g liver.43
Verapamil was used as a positive control to confirm acceptable assay
performance.
In Vivo Mouse Pharmacokinetics and Brain Penetration.
Mouse Pharmacokinetics. Each compound was dosed as a bolus
solution intraperitoneally at 10 mg free base/kg (dose volume, 10 mL/
kg; dose vehicles used, 10% DMSO; 40% PEG400; 50% Milli-Q water or
5% DMSO; 40% PEG400; 55% saline) to female HRN (1 only) or
NMRI mice (n = 3) or dosed orally by gavage as a solution at 10 mg free
base/kg (dose volume, 10 mL/kg; dose vehicle, 10% DMSO; 40%
PEG400; 50% Milli-Q water) to female NMRI mice (n = 3). Female
NMRI mice were chosen, as these represent the sex and strain used for
the stage 1 and stage 2 HAT efficacy models. Blood samples were taken
from each mouse at 5 (IP only), 15, and 30 min, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 h post
dose, mixed with two volumes of distilled water, and stored frozen until
UPLC/MS/MS analysis. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived
from noncompartmental analysis of the blood concentration time curve
using PK solutions software v 2.0 (Summit Research Services, USA).
Mouse Brain Penetration. Each compound was dosed as a bolus
solution intravenously at 0.5 or 1 mg free base/kg (dose volume, 5 mL/
kg; dose vehicle, 10% DMSO; 40% PEG400; 50% Milli-Q water) to
female NMRI mice (n = 6). At 5 and 30 min following intravenous bolus
injection of test compound, mice (n = 3/time point) were placed under
terminal anesthesia with isofluorane. A blood sample was taken by
cardiac puncture and mixed with two volumes of distilled water, the mice
decapitated, and the brain removed. Diluted blood and brains were
stored frozen until preparation and analysis by UPLC/MS/MS. For
each mouse at each time point, the concentration in brain (ng/g) was
divided by the concentration in blood (ng/mL) to give a brain:blood
ratio. The mean value obtained was quoted.
Mouse Stage-1 and Stage-2 Efficacy Mouse Models. These
were carried out as previously described27,32 at the dose level presented
and using the same dose formulation as the pharmacokinetic studies.
HRN mice were used under the same infection and monitoring protocol
as described for female NMRI mice.
Animal Ethics. All regulated procedures on living animals were
carried out under the authority of a project license issued by the Home
Office under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986, as amended
in 2012 (and in compliance with EU Directive EU/2010/63). License
applications were approved by the University’s Ethical Review
Committee (ERC) before submission to the Home Office. The ERC
has a general remit to develop and oversee policy on all aspects of the use
of animals on University premises and is a subcommittee of the
University Court, its highest governing body.
Chemistry/Compound Characterization. General Methods.
Chemicals and solvents were purchased from Aldrich Chemical Co.,
Alfa Aesar, Fluorochem, Apollo, and Fisher Chemicals and were used as
received unless otherwise stated. Air- and moisture-sensitive reactions
were carried out under an inert atmosphere of argon in oven-dried
glassware. Analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed
on precoated TLC plates (layer 0.20 mm silica gel 60 with fluorescent
indicator UV254, from Merck). Developed plates were air-dried and
J
J. Med. Chem. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX