3156
Y. Zhang et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 52 (2011) 3154–3157
and could be used in the synthesis of other glycoconjugates bear-
ing similar 2,6-branched trisaccharides.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foun-
dation of China (No.30672508), Beijing Municipal Natural Science
Foundation (No.7072061) and Ministry of Science and Technology
of the People’s Republic of China through the National Key Tech-
nologies R&D Program for New Drugs (No.2009ZX09301-002).
We sincerely acknowledge their financial support.
References and notes
1. Zhang, Q.; Yang, M.; Zhao, Y.; Luan, X.; Ke, Y. Acta Pharm. Sin. 2001, 36, 827.
2. Li, Y.; Yang, M.; Yuan, L.; Zhao, Y.; Luan, X.; Luo, Z. Chin. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol.
2000, 14, 125.
3. Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Gong, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Li, Y. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2009, 607,
110.
4. Guo, J.; Zhang, S.; Meng, F.; Zhao, Y. Chem. J. Chin. U. 2009, 30, 1528.
5. (a) Williams, C. A. In Flavonoids: Chemistry, Biochemistry, and Applications;
Anderson, Ø. M., Markham, K. R., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, 2006. pp 746–
856; (b) Veitch, N. C.; Grayer, R. J. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2008, 25, 555.
6. Harborne, J. B.; Williams, C. A. Phytochemistry 2000, 55, 481.
7. Smith, J. A.; Poteet-Smith, C. E.; Xu, Y.; Errington, T. M.; Hecht, S. M.; Lannigan,
D. A. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 1027.
8. Butterweck, V.; Jürgenliemk, G.; Nahrstedt, A.; Winterhoff, H. Planta Med. 2000,
66, 3.
9. Emura, K.; Yokomizo, A.; Toyoshi, T.; Moriwaki, M. J. Nuti. Sci. Vitaminal. 2007,
53, 68.
Scheme 4. Reagents and conditions: (a) 3 (1.5 equiv), BF3ꢁOEt2 (0.75 equiv), 4 Å
MS, CH2Cl2, ꢀ30 °C, 2 h, 75%; (b) 2 (2.2 equiv), AgOTf (2.2 equiv), CH2Cl2, ꢀ30 °C,
2 h, 52%; (c) NaOMe, CH2Cl2-CH3OH (5:1), rt, 12 h; (d) H2, 10% Pd-C, EtOH-EtOAc
(1:1), rt, 12 h, 82% for two steps.
10. (a) Bouktaib, M.; Atmani, A.; Rolando, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 6263; (b) Li,
M.; Han, X.; Yu, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 9467; (c) Du, Y.; Wei, G.; Linhardt,
R. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 6887; (d) Du, Y.; Wei, G.; Linhardt, R. J. Org.
Chem. 2004, 69, 2206; (e) Maloney, D. J.; Hecht, S. M. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1097; (f)
Peng, W.; Li, Y.; Zhu, C.; Han, X.; Yu, B. Carbohydr. Res. 2005, 340, 1682; (g)
Caldwell, S. T.; Petersson, H. M.; Farrugia, L. J.; Mullen, A. C.; Hartley, R. C.
Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 7257; (h) Zhu, C.; Peng, W.; Li, Y.; Han, X.; Yu, B.
Carbohydr. Res. 2006, 341, 1047; (i) Li, Z.; Ngojeh, G.; DeWitt, P.; Zheng, Z.;
Chen, M.; Lainhart, B.; Li, V.; Felpo, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 7243; (j) Yang,
W.; Sun, J.; Lu, W.; Li, Y.; Shan, L.; Han, W.; Zhang, W.; Yu, B. J. Org. Chem. 2010,
75, 6879.
11. (a) Yamada, H.; Kato, T.; Takahashi, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 4581; (b)
Zhang, M.; Du, Y.; Kong, F. Carbohydr. Res. 2001, 330, 319; (c) Li, B.; Yu, B.; Hui,
Y.; Li, M.; Han, X.; Fung, K. Carbohydr. Res. 2001, 331, 1.
12. Li, H.; Luan, X.; Zhao, Y. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 24, 1619.
13. Schmidt, O. T. In Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry; Whistler, R. L., Wolfrom,
M. L., Eds.; Academic Press Inc.: New York and London, 1963. Vol. 2, pp 320–
324.
14. Finan, P. A.; Warren, C. D. J. Chem. Soc. 1962, 3089.
15. Demetzos, C.; Skaltsounis, A.-L.; Tillequin, F.; Koch, M. Carbohydr. Res. 1990,
207, 131.
16. Byramova, N. E.; Ovchinnikov, M. V.; Backinowsky, L. V.; Kochetkov, N. K.
Carbohydr Res. 1983, 124, C8.
17. Mbaïraroua, O.; Ton-That, T.; Tapiéro, C. Carbohydr Res. 1994, 253, 79.
18. Ezekiel, A. D.; Overend, W. G.; Williams, N. R. J. Chem. Soc.(C) 1971, 2907.
19. Ho, P. Can. J. Chem. 1979, 57, 381.
80% formic acid to provide 5-O-benzoyl-
a
/b-
D-apiofuranose 15.
The remaining 5-O-benzoyl group of 15 ensured the
D-configura-
tion of the apiose moiety. Compound 15 was subsequently benzoy-
lated with BzCl in CH2Cl2 in the presence of pyridine to form 16
(80%). The benzoyl protected intermediates 14, 15, and 16 were
easy to purify by crystallization. Bromination on the anomeric car-
bon of 16 using 40% HBr in HAc furnished the apiofuranosyl donor
2. The glycosyl donor 3, 2,3,4-tri-O-benzoyl-
trichloroacetimidate, was synthesized as described previously.11b
Reaction of 4 with the -rhamnopyranosyl donor 3 in the pres-
a-L-rhamnopyranosyl-
L
ence of BF3ꢁOEt2 in anhydrous CH2Cl2 at ꢀ30 °C (Scheme 4) pro-
vided the quercetin disaccharide derivative 17 in 75% yield after
column chromatography.11b Subsequent regioselective glycosyla-
tion of 17 with the D-apiofuranosyl donor 2 catalyzed by silver tri-
flate afforded the desired quercetin trisaccharide derivative 18 in a
moderate isolated yield (52%).11c TOCSY and NOE difference spec-
troscopy experiments were carried out to fully assign the structure
of 18. Selective irradiation of H-1II (d 5.59 ppm) showed NOE
enhancement of H-2I (d 4.18 ppm), while selective irradiation of
H-1III (d 4.89 ppm) showed NOE enhancements of H-6aI and H-
6bI (d 3.72–3.66 ppm). This NOE result confirms the 2,6-branched
structure of the trisaccharide moiety of 18. Finally, removal of
the benzoyl groups with a catalytic amount of NaOMe in CH2Cl2–
MeOH and the benzyl groups by catalytic hydrogenation over
10% Pd-C afforded the deprotected product in high yield (82%).
Purification of the deprotected product on Sephadex LH20 eluted
with MeOH furnished the target molecule 1. All the spectroscopic
data recorded for 1 were in accordance with those of its natural
counterpart.1,20,21
In summary, a feasible approach to the synthesis of a flavonol
triglycoside which bears a unique 2,6-branched trisaccharide sub-
unit was established. The longest linear sequence (from 8 to 1) in
the synthetic route required eleven steps and reached an overall
yield of 14.6%. To date, this is the first synthesis of a flavonol gly-
coside carrying a 2,6-branched trisaccharide. The strategy for the
construction of the 2,6-branched trisaccharide subunit was concise
20. Wang, Q.; Li, L.; Li, M. Chin. Tradit. Herbal Drugs. 1996, 27, 518.
21. Selected data for the key compounds. 11. ½a D24
ꢂ
ꢀ116.4°(c 0.1, CH3COCH3); 1H
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d 8.00–7.30 (m, 22H, H-60, H-20 and Ar), 7.01 (d, 1H, J
8.4 Hz, H-50), 6.48 (d, 1H, 2.2 Hz, H-8), 6.43 (d, 1H, J 2.2 Hz, H-6), 5.69 (d, 1H, J
8.0 Hz, H-1I), 5.53 (t, 1H, J 9.6 Hz, H-3I), 5.36–5.32 (m, 3H, H-4I and ArCH2O–),
5.27 (s, 2H, ArCH2O–), 5.25 (t, 1H, J 9.6 Hz, H-2I), 5.13 (s, 2H, ArCH2O–), 4.02–
4.00 (m, 2H, H-5I and H-6aI), 3.72 (m, 1H, H-6bI), 2.01, 1.92, 1.85 (3s, 9H, 3 Ac);
HR-MS (ESI-TOF) calcd for C55H49O16 [M+H]+ 965.3015, found 965.3013. 4. ½a 2D5
ꢂ
+9.4°(c 1.0, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d 8.13–7.26 (m, 27H, H-60, H-20
and Ar), 7.01 (d, 1H, J 8.4 Hz, H-50), 6.55 (d, 1H, 2.2 Hz, H-8), 6.49 (d, 1H, J
2.2 Hz, H-6), 5.25, 5.24, 5.20, 5.09 (4s, 8H, 4 ArCH2O–), 5.07 (t, 1H, J 10.8 Hz, H-
3I), 4.81 (d, 1H, J 8.0 Hz, H-1I), 3.88 (t, 1H, J 9.8 Hz, H-4I), 3.59–3.24 (m, 4H, H-2I,
H-5I, H-6aI and H-6bI); HR-MS (ESI-TOF) calcd for C56H49O13 [M+H]+ 929.3173,
found 929.3131. 18. ½a D24
ꢂ
ꢀ67.6°(c 0.1, CH3COCH3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3):
d 8.12–7.13 (m, 58H, H-60, H-20, H-50 and Ar), 6.35 (m, 2H, H-8 and H-6), 6.17
(d, 1H, J 7.6 Hz, H-1I), 5.81 (s, 1H, H-2II), 5.76 (dd, 1H, J 10.0, 3.2 Hz, H-3III), 5.63
(m, 1H, H-2III), 5.59 (s, 1H, H-1II), 5.57 (t, 1H, J 10.0 Hz, H-4III), 5.47 (t, 1H, J
9.2 Hz, H-3I), 5.33–4.91 (m, 10H, H-5aII, H-5bIIand 4 ArCH2O–), 4.89 (s, 1H, H-
1III), 4.56 (d, 1H, J 10.8 Hz, H-4aII), 4.39 (d, 1H, J 10.8 Hz, H-4bII), 4.18 (t, 1H, J
8.0 Hz, H-2I), 4.08 (m, 1H, H-5III), 4.02 (d, 1H, J 10.8 Hz, H-5I), 3.84 (t, 1H, J
9.2 Hz, H-4I), 3.72–3.66 (m, 2H, H-6aI and H-6bI), 1.18 (d, 3H, J 6.0 Hz, H-6III);
HR-MS (ESI-TOF) calcd for C109H91O27 [M+H]+ 1831.5742, found 1831.5745. 1.
½
a 2D4
ꢂ
ꢀ36.0°(c 0.1, MeOH); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 7.59 (dd, 1H, J 8.4,
2.4 Hz, H-60), 7.50 (d, 1H, J 2.4 Hz, H-20), 6.82 (d, 1H, J 8.4 Hz, H-50), 6.37 (d, 1H, J
2.0 Hz, H-8), 6.18 (d, 1H, J 2.0 Hz, H-6), 5.47 (d, 1H, J 7.6 Hz, H-1I), 5.33 (s, 1H,
H-1II), 4.32 (s, 1H, H-1III), 3.82 (d, 1H, J 9.6 Hz, H-4bII), 3.80 (d, 1H, J 3.2 Hz, H-