probed serially after the addition of each solvent. For example,
upon exposure to buffer, four different devices were characterized
in order to avoid drawing conclusions from single, anomalous
devices. Then, the next buffer was introduced to the chamber
and the next set of measurements were collected. Upon
exposure to PPi solution, a similar threshold voltage shift at
1 nA (À0.5 Æ 0.1 V compared to initial buffer) was observed
on four different chelator-modified SOI-FET devices on the
same chip and this response was reversible after a 0.1 M acetic
acid rinse and second incubation in buffer (+0.4 Æ 0.1 V).
While there were slight variations in curve shape and threshold
voltage position from sensor to sensor, the IV curve shapes for
individual sensors for Tris buffer before, during PPi exposure,
and Tris buffer after were similar, as shown in Fig. 2b.
FET devices modified with PEG blocking molecules instead
of PPi-sensitive chelator were not responsive to 25 mM PPi in
Tris buffer solution with Zn2+ (ESIw). In addition, unmodified
FET devices exhibited no response to the same level of PPi in
solution. These observations strongly indicate that PPi capture
by the chelator on the sensor surface causes changes in surface
charge distribution and thus enables selective electrical
detection of PPi. These results also suggested that a chelator-
modified FET device could detect PPi generated from
polymerase reactions in solution. Preliminary data from our
lab indicate this indeed is the case and results will be published
elsewhere.13
also be expanded to other surface-sensitive detection technologies
for PPi or its analogues, such as on-surface optical fluorescent
or colorimetric detection, waveguide-based detection, and
surface plasmon resonance.
We thank J. Zhang, M. Yamakawa, S. Tan, M. Palla and
R. Murray for experimental assistance; J. Daniels for proofreading;
B. Pathangey and A. Proctor (ATD Q&R Lab, Intel) for
providing TOF SIMS data; B. Reddy, Jr. and the staff at the
Micro and Nanotechnology Laboratory at UIUC for FET
processing; and Stanford Nanofabrication Facility (SNF) for
providing instrument access for ellipsometry.
Notes and references
1 M. Ronaghi, M. Uhlen and P. M. Nyren, Science, 1998, 281, 363.
´
2 S. Joo and R. B. Brown, Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 638; J. Shendure,
R. Mitra, C. Varma and G. M. Church, Nat. Rev. Genet., 2004,
5, 335.
3 S. K. Kim, D. H. Lee, J. I. Hong and J. Yoon, Acc. Chem. Res.,
2009, 42, 23.
4 M. Kruppa and B. Konig, Chem. Rev., 2006, 106, 3520.
5 M. S. Han and D. H. Kim, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 3809.
6 R. G. Hanshaw, S. M. Hilkert, H. Jiang and B. D. Smith,
Tetrahedron Lett., 2004, 45, 8721.
7 H. O. Elibol, J. B. Reddy and R. Bashir, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2008,
93, 131908.
8 P. Bergveld, Sens. Actuators, B, 2003, 88, 1.
9 P. A. Neff, B. K. Wunderlich, S. Q. Lud and A. R. Bausch, Phys.
Status Solidi A, 2006, 203, 3417.
10 S. Q. Lud, M. G. Nikolaides, I. Haase, M. Fischer and
A. R. Bausch, ChemPhysChem, 2006, 7, 379.
11 B. R. Takulapalli, ACS Nano, 2010, 4, 999.
12 I. Goykhman, N. Korbakov, C. Bartic, G. Borghs, M. E. Spira,
J. Shappir and S. Yitzchaik, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 4788.
13 G. M. Credo, X. Su, D. J. Liu, K. Wu, O. H. Elibol, B. Reddy Jr.,
T.-W. Tsai, B. R. Dorvel, J. Daniels, R. Bashir, M. Varma, 2011,
submitted.
In summary, we have synthesized and characterized a new
type of pyrophosphate chelator and demonstrated electronic
detection of PPi by immobilizing it to a field-effect sensor.
Because PPi is a common product of many important
biological reactions,14 the concept of ‘‘signal immobilization’’
of PPi presented in this work can be applied to develop
electronic biosensors for broad biomedical applications from
DNA sequencing to microbe detection. This concept could
14 J. K. Heinonen, Biological role of inorganic pyrophosphate, Kluwer
Academic Publishers, London, U.K, 2001, ch. 1, pp. 1–28.
c
8312 Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 8310–8312
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011