10.1002/chem.201904463
Chemistry - A European Journal
FULL PAPER
the sample in the solvent at elevated temperature. These samples were
equilibrated at rt for 2h before spectral measurements were carried out.
UV/Vis studies were carried out at 25 °C using the cuvette of 1.0 cm path
length. FT-IR studies were done with relatively concentrated samples
(5.0 mM) using Perkin Elmer Spectrum 100FT-IR spectrometer for OT-1
and OT-2 in CHCl3 and MCH.
1]
a) T. F. A. De Greef, M. M. J. Smulders, M. Wolffs, A. P. H. J.
Schenning, R. P. Sijbesma, E. W. Meijer, Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 5687;
b) F. Würthner, Acc. Chem. Res. 2016, 49, 868; c) F. Würthner, C. R.
Saha-Mꢀller, B. Fimmel, S. Ogi, P. Leowanawat, David Schmidt, Chem.
Rev. 2016, 116, 962; d) A. Ajayaghosh, V. K. Praveen, Acc. Chem. Res.
2007, 40, 644; d) C. Rest, R. Kandanelli, G. Fernández, Chem. Soc.
Rev. 2015, 44, 2543; e) S. Yagai, Y. Kitamoto, S. Datta, B. Adhikari,
Acc. Chem. Res. 2019, 52, 1325; f) N. Sakai, J. Mareda, E. Vauthey, S.
Matile, Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 4225; g) M. A. Kobaisi, S. V.
Bhosale, K. Latham, A. M. Raynor, S. V. Bhosale, Chem. Rev. 2016,
116, 11685; h) A. Das, S. Ghosh, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53,
2038; i) C. Kulkarni, S. Balasubramanian, S. J. George, Chem. Phys.
Chem. 2013, 14, 661.
AFM studies: Sample solutions of OT-1 and OT-2 (C= 0.05 mM) were
prepared in methylcyclohexane by directly dissolving the solid in a given
solvent at elevated temperature and then these solutions were
equilibrated at rt for 2h. 10 µl of each sample was drop casted on mica
surface and spin coated at speed of 1000 rpm for 1 min and air dried for
overnight before capturing AFM images.
[2]
[3]
a) A. Saeki, Y. Koizumi, T. Aida, S. Seki, Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 45,
1193; b) S. Seki, A. Saeki, T. Sakurai, D. Sakamaki, Phys. Chem.
Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 11093; c) S. S. Babu, S. Prasanthkumar, A.
Ajayaghosh, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 1766.
Cyclic voltammetry: Cyclic voltammetry experiment was performed in
dichloromethane (10-3 M) at a scan rate of 100 mV s-1 using a three
electrode setup consisting of a glassy carbon working electrode, a
platinum wire auxiliary electrode, and a silver wire (as the pseudo-
reference electrode). Tetra-n-butylammonium hexafluorophosphate (0.1
M) was used as the supporting electrolyte. Reference electrode was
frrocene/ferrocenium couple (Fc/Fc+). The HOMO and LUMO energy
levels of OT-1 and OT-2 molecule was calculated from the onset
oxidation potential (EOx1 onset) and the onset reduction potential (ERed1
onset) using following equations.
a) M. D. Curtis, J. Cao, J. W. Kampf, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
4318; b) J. C. Sancho-García, A. J. Pérez-Jiménez, Y. Olivier, J. Cornil,
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 9381.
[4]
[5]
a) A. Facchetti, Mater. Today, 2007, 10, 28; b) A. R. Murphy, J. M.
Fréchet, Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 1066.
a) C. B. Nielsen, S. Holliday, H. Y. Chen, S. J. Cryer, I. McCulloch, Acc.
Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 2803; b) G. Y. Zhang, J. B. Zhao, P. C. Y. Chow,
K. Jiang, J. Q. Zhang, Z. L. Zhu, J. Zhang, F. Huang H. Yan, Chem.
Rev. 2018, 118, 3447.
EHOMO= - (Eox1 onset - E Fc/Fc+ onset) - 4.80 eV
ELUMO= - (ERed1 onset - E Fc/Fc+ onset) - 4.80 eV
[6]
a) D. Deng, Y. J. Zhang, J. Q. Zhang, Z. Y. Wang, L. Y. Zhu, J. Fang, B.
Z. Xia, Z. Wang, K. Lu, W. Ma, Z. X. Wei, Nat. Commun. 2016, 7,
13740; b) K. Gao, L. S. Li, T. Q. Lai, L. G. Xiao, Y. Huang, F. Huang, J.
B. Peng, Y. Cao, F. Liu, T. P. Russell, R. A. J. Janssen, X. B. Peng, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 7282; c) T. Duan, H. Tang, R.-Z. Liang, J.
Lv, Z. Kan, R. Singh, M. Kumar, Z. Xiao, S. Lu, F. Laquai, J. Mater.
Chem. A 2019, 7, 2541.
Egap=ELUMO–EHOMO, E
onset is 0.5 vs Ag/AgCl for OT-1 and OT-2,
Fc/Fc+
respectively.
Current (I)-Voltage (V) measurements: Indium tin oxide (ITO) coated
glass substrate was scrubbed with soapy water and cleaned with
acetone. 10 wt % MCH solution of each molecule (OT-1 or OT-2) was
spin coated on 1 cm x 1 cm indium tin oxide (ITO) coated glass surface
and was kept under vacuum for 12 h. Aluminum (Al) electrode was
deposited and silver paste was used at two connection points. I-V profile
of this device was checked in a Keithley 617 programmable electrometer
instrument and conductivity (σ) was calculated equation by following
equation.
[7]
[8]
A. Mishra, C.-Q. Ma, P. Bauerle, Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 1141.
a)A. Mishra, D. Popovic, A. Vogt, H. Kast, T. Leitner, K. Walzer, M.
Pfeiffer, E. Mena-Osteritz, P. Bauerle, Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 7217; b)W.
Ni, X. J. Wan, M. M. Li, Y. C. Wang, Y. S. Chen, Chem. Commun. 2015,
51, 4936; c) H. Ouchi, X. Lin, S. Yagai, Chem. Lett. 2019, 48, 1009.
a) V. Grande, B. Soberats, S. Herbst, V. Stepanenkoa; F. Wurthner,
Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 6904; b) S. Bhattacharjee, B. Maitia, S.
Bhattacharya, Nanoscale 2016, 8, 11224; c) S, Yagai, Y, Nakano, S,
Seki, A, Asano, T, Okubo, T, Isoshima, T, Karatsu, A, Kitamura, Y,
Kikkawa, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 9990; d) B. Narayan, C.
Kulkarni S. J. George, J. Mater. Chem. C. 2013, 1, 626; e) H. Shao, J.
Seifert, N. C. Romano, M. Gao, J. J. Helmus, C.P. Jaroniec, D. A.
Modarelli, J. R. Parquette, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 7688; f) X.-
Q. Li, V. Stepanenko, Z. Chen, P. Prins, L.D.A. Siebbeles, F. Würthner,
Chem. Commun. 2006, 3871; g) M. B. Avinash, E. Verheggen, C.
Schmuck, T. Govindaraju, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 10324; h) A.
Ajayaghosh, R. Varghese, V. K. Praveen S. Mahesh, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 3261; i) S. Burattini, B. W. Greenland, D. H. Merino,
W. Weng, J. Seppala, H. M. Colquhoun, W. Hayes, M. E. Mackay, I. W.
Hamley, S. J. Rowan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 12051; j) P. Teng,
Z. Niu, F. She, M. Zhou, P. Sang, G. M. Gray, G. Verma, L. Wojtas, A.
van der Vaart, S. Ma, J. Cai, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 5661; k) M.
Lübtow, I. Helmers, V. Stepanenko, R. Q. Albuquerque, T. B. Marder, G.
Fernández, Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 6198; l) A. Rödle, B. Ritschel, C.
Mück-Lichtenfeld, V. Stepanenko, G. Fernández. Chem. Eur. J. 2016,
22, 15772; m) F. Aparicio, L. Sánchez, Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 10482;
n) J. Buendía, L. Sánchez, Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 5746; o) B. Adhikari, X.
Lin, M. Yamauchi, H. Ouchi, K. Aratsu, S. Yagai, Chem. Commun.
2017, 53, 9663.
[9]
σ =1/ [ (V/I) x πt/ln2]
Where t = film thickness estimated by AFM (340 nm and 420 nm for OT-1
and OT-2, respectively).
Computational methodology: The geometry optimization and electronic
transitions of the Acceptor-Donor-Acceptor (A-D-A) triad molecule was
examined theoretically by density functional theory (DFT) and time
dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) as implemented in the
Gaussian 09, Revision A.02 program package.[23] Geometry optimization
as well as the band gap determination were performed using the B3LYP
(Becke three-parameter Lee–Yang–Parr) exchange correlation
functional.[24] The basis set 6-311G(d,p) was used for all atoms other
than the dimer calculations. The Polarizable Continuum Model (PCM)
was utilised to treat the bulk solvent effects for both ground and excited
states. CAM-B3LYP functional which is the long-range corrected version
of B3LYP using the Coulomb-attenuating method has been reported to
better simulate the vertical transition energies has been employed.[25]
Acknowledgements
SC thanks CSIR for a research fellowship. SG thanks DST for
funding through SwarnaJayanti Fellowship (DST/SJF/CSA-01/2-
14-15). SV acknowledges Technical Research Centre, IACS
(Project No.AI/1/62/IACS/2015) for financial support.
[10] a) F. S. Schoonbeek, J. H. Van Esch, B. Wegewijs, D. B. A. Rep, M. P.
De Haas, T. M. Klapwijk, R. M. Kellogg, B. L. Feringa, Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 1393; b) P. Pratihar, S. Ghosh, V. Stepanenko, S.
Patwardhan, F. C. Grozema, L. D. A. Siebbeles, F. Würthner, Beilstein
J. Org. Chem. 2010, 6, 1070; c) H. Ouchi, T. Kizaki, M. Yamato, X. Lin,
N. Hoshi, F. Silly, T. Kajitani, T. Fukushima, K. Nakayama, S. Yagai,
Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 3638.
Keywords: Supramolecular Assembly • Oligothiophene
derivative • H-aggregate • H-bonding• Organogel • Conductivity
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.