270
M. Zakeri et al. / Journal of Molecular Liquids 199 (2014) 267–274
Table 2
[BSO3HMIM]HSO4 and [BSO3HMIM]CF3SO3 as catalysts, for 10 min
Solvent optimization for the synthesis of 4
under microwave irradiation, desired product 4f could be obtained in
and 45%, respectively (Table 1, entries 8, 9, 10 and 11). [BMIM]Ac did
not significantly increase the yield of the desired product (Table 1,
entry 12). However, when the model reaction was run in [BSO3HPy]
HSO4, the reaction was completed in 10 min and offered the desired
product with 90% isolated yield (Table 1, entry 3). To compare the
catalytic performance based on the acidity measurement, five ILs
with the same cations and different anions were selected. The relative
acidity of these ILs is as follows: [BMIM]HSO4 N [BMIM]Cl N [BMIM]
BF4 N [BMIM]Ac N [BMIM]Br [26]. However, no clear relationship
could be established between the catalytic performance and acidic
strength. The catalytic activities of the acidic ILs decreased in the
order of [BMIM]HSO4 N [BMIM]Cl N [BMIM]Br N [BMIM]BF4 N [BMIM]
Ac. While the most acidic ILs are the best performing, the reactivity of
the rest of the ILs does not follow the trend in their acidity. It can be sug-
gested, that not only the acidity of the ILs is influencing the reactions,
but also the nature of anions of ILs is having a significant effect on the
yield.
Entry
Solvent
Temperature (°C)
Time (min)
Isolated yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
H2O
EtOH
MeCN
CHCl3
–
120
120
120
120
80
100
120
150
20
20
20
15
20
20
10
10
15
60
52
42
44
65
90
90
–
–
–
140.2, 160.8, 163.0, 163.2 (1J C–F = 244.4), 164.6 ppm; Anal. Calcd for
C18H14FN3: C, 74.21; H, 4.84; N, 14.42. Found: C, 74.33; H, 5.03; N, 14.27.
4-(Furan-2-yl)-5,6-dihydrobenzo[h]quinazolin-2-amine (5l): IR
(KBr): 3320, 3200, 2925, 1640, 1580, 1540, 1490, 1460, 1215,
775 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 2.85–2.88 (2H, dd, J = 7.5
and J = 6.9 Hz, CH2), 3.05–3.08 (2H, dd, J = 7.7 and J = 6.7 Hz, CH2),
6.5 (2H, s, NH2), 6.69–6.70 (1H, m, ArH), 7.1 (1H, d, J = 3.3 Hz, ArH),
7.29–7.31 (1H, d, J = 7.2 Hz, ArH), 7.36–7.40 (2H, m, ArH), 7.92 (1H, s,
ArH), 8.15–8.17 (1H, d, J = 7.3 Hz, ArH) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz,
DMSO-d6): δ 23.5, 28.1, 112.73, 113.5, 114.3, 125.8, 127.5, 128.6, 131.2,
133.7, 140.1, 145.5, 153.0, 154.1, 161.3, 162.8 ppm; Anal. Calcd for
C16H13N3O: C, 72.86; H, 4.98; N, 15.96. Found: C, 72 .67; H, 5.06; N, 15.79.
When [BSO3HPy]HSO4 was used as a catalyst, the amount of catalyst
required for this reaction was evaluated (Table 1, entries 1–4). Only
15 mol% of IL was required to convert the substrate into the correspond-
ing product and higher amounts of the catalyst did not significantly in-
crease the yields (Table 1, entry 3). Reaction with 10 mol% of the catalyst
required a longer reaction time (Table 1, entry 2) while the reaction
with 5 mol% of [BSO3HPy]HSO4 produced only 52% yield of the product
after 20 min under microwave irradiation (Table 1, entry 1).
3. Results and discussion
Choosing an appropriate solvent has crucial importance for the suc-
cessful microwave-assisted synthesis. To search for the optimal solvent,
the model reaction was investigated in the presence of a catalytic
amount of [BSO3HPy]HSO4 using various solvents such as EtOH, H2O,
MeCN, and CHCl3 at 120 °C under microwave irradiation to determine
which one can give the best results. The results of these comparative ex-
periments are summarized in Table 2. Unfortunately, the obtained yield
using water as a solvent was too small because of the low solubility of
the reactants (Table 2, entry 1).
At the onset of our work, 9 ILs shown in Fig. 2 with unique ability in
catalyzing of multicomponent reactions were selected [37,38]. Reaction
of furfural 1g, guanidine carbonate 2 and 4-methyl cyclohexanon 3c
was selected as a model reaction.
It was observed that almost all of the investigated ILs were capable of
catalyzing the synthesis of desired quinazoline- and pyrimidine-2-
amine derivatives under the microwave at 120 °C except for [BMIM]
Ac. Optimization studies revealed that when the reaction was carried
out using sulfonic acid-bearing ILs such as [DBSO3HDM]2H2SO4,
The effect of temperature on this one-pot and multicomponent reac-
tions was also investigated. It was observed that there is a clear trend
Table 3
Optimization of reaction conditions
Entry
Catalyst (mol%)
Solvent
Temperature
Time (min)
Isolated yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
[BSO3HPy]HSO4 (15)
[BSO3HPy]HSO4 (15)
[BSO3HPy]HSO4 (15)
[BSO3HPy]HSO4 (15)
–
–
–
–
–
H2O
EtOH
MeCN
CHCl3
[BSO3HPy]HSO4
[BSO3HPy]HSO4
[BSO3HPy]HSO4
[BMIM]Cl
[BMIM]HSO4
30
30
30
30
30
40
50
50
50
120
120
120
120
40
40
40
60
60
nra
54
35
33
75
78
80
76
72
a
nr = no reaction.