Inorganic Chemistry
Article
circumvent this, we sought to obtain 9 directly by reacting 4
with an Fe(0) source such as (bda)Fe(CO)3 (bda =
benzylideneacetone), relying on the facile displacement of
bda under thermolytic conditions. This method allows access
to 9 on scale, in good isolated yields (Scheme 2), and avoids
the use of large quantities of mercury. The formally Fe(0)
complex is obtained as a green, diamagnetic solid, with a C2v
symmetry in solution, as observed by NMR spectroscopy. It
displays good solubility in all common organic solvents,
including pentane, from which the compound could be
recrystallized. The molecular structure (Figure 2, left) confirms
(vs ferrocene), shifted anodically by 260 mV in comparison to
the iPrPDI ligand (−2.62 V vs ferrocene) and very similar to
that of the 4-CF3-iPrPDI ligand (−2.35 V vs ferrocene) (Figure
3).19b Complex 9 displays one reversible oxidation event at a
Figure 3. Cyclic voltammetry (glassy-carbon working electrode, 0.1
M (nBu4N)[B(C6F5)4], scan rate 100 mV s−1 in THF at 295 K versus
ferrocene0/+): (left) overlay of iPrPDI (blue) and iPrPPzDI (red) (4);
(right) overlay of iPr(PDI)Fe(CO)2 (blue) and iPr(PPzDI)Fe(CO)2
(red) (9).
Figure 2. Solid-state characterization data for 9. (left) Molecular
structure obtained by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Only one of the
two molecules present in the asymmetric unit is displayed. The
cocrystallized pentane molecule and hydrogen atoms are omitted for
peak potential of −0.23 V (vs ferrocene) and one reversible
reduction event at −2.28 V (vs ferrocene), both anodically
shifted by 260 and 180 mV, respectively, in comparison to
(iPrPDI)Fe(CO)2 (−0.49 and −2.46 V vs ferrocene). In
analogy to the studies reported by Chirik, we assign the
oxidation wave to be metal-based (Fe0 to FeI) and the
reduction wave to be ligand-based (L to L•−).25 The data
suggest that the magnitude of the HOMO−LUMO gaps are
similar, where the levels of the frontier orbitals in (PPzDI)Fe-
(CO)2 would be lower in comparison to the (PDI)Fe(CO)2
analogue, which was also confirmed by computing the
energetic levels of the frontier orbitals (vide infra). The
oxidation state of the formally Fe(0) carbonyl complexes
supported by potentially noninnocent iminopyridine-based
PNN and PDI systems has been previously discussed in great
depth and assessed through combined spectroscopic and
computational means.26 Metrical parameters obtained from
clarity. (right) Zero-field 57Fe−Mossbauer spectrum recorded at 80 K.
̈
The red line represents a fit with a Lorentzian quadrupole doublet
with the following parameters: δ = 0.03 mm s−1, |ΔEQ| = 1.29 mm s−1.
The deviations at ca. 0 and 2 mm s−1 indicate an 11% contamination
with an unknown Fe(II) species.
that the geometry around the metal center is idealized square
pyramidal (∠OC−Fe−CO = 94.63(9)°), while the N2−Cimine
,
Cimine−Cipso, and Cipso−N3 bond distances are nearly identical
with those of (iPrPDI)Fe(CO)2 (for 9, N2−Cimine 1.326(2) Å,
Cimine−Cipso 1.432(3) Å, and Cipso−N3 1.375(2) Å; for
(iPrPDI)Fe(CO)2,10b N2−Cimine 1.332(2) Å, Cimine−Cipso
1.428(3) Å, and Cipso−N3 1.379(2) Å).
The solid-state IR (ATR, Table 1) spectrum of 9 displays
two absorptions in a 0.9:1.1 intensity ratio, suggesting two
Table 1. 15N NMR Data and Infrared Stretches νCO for
Complexes 4, 9, [10]·I, 11, and (PDI)Fe(CO)2
single-crystal diffractometry, especially the N2−Cimine, Cimine
−
C
ipso, and Cipso−N3 bond distances, have been found to have
a
15N NMR
IR (νCO)
diagnostic value in distinguishing between Fe0 species bound
by a neutral ligand, LFe0(CO)2, and an FeII species
antiferromagnetically coupled to a reduced ligand diradical,
L•2−FeII(CO)2. In the case of 9, the N2−Cimine and Cipso−N3
b
complex
δN1
δN2
δN4
solid
soln
4
345.8
255.0
250.8
261.9
222.9
c
c
c
c
321.8
e
e
f
(PDI)Fe(CO)2
9
[10]·I
11
1946, 1888 1974, 1914
1967, 1904 1984, 1925
1999, 1938 2010, 1952
1955, 1889 1972, 1907
bond distances appear significantly elongated while the Cimine
−
d
Cipso bond is significantly contracted in compared to those in
the free ligand 4 and (PPzDI)FeCl2 (8) (Figure 4). The bond
distances are similar to those computed for the monoanionic
form of the α-iminopyridine of 1.34, 1.41, and 1.39 Å
respectively,9 while Wieghardt’s single structural parameter
Δexp = 0.0772 (Δcalc(DFT,B3LYP) = 0.0767; vide infra)
145.5
80.8
e
185.9
a
b
c
d
Determined by 1H−15N HMBC. IR-ATR,. δN1 = δN2
.
Not
e
f
observable. In pentane. In CH2Cl2.
nonequivalent CO ligands, as confirmed by single-crystal X-ray
diffraction. The νCO stretching frequencies of 9 (1967, 1904
cm−1) are slightly shifted to higher frequencies in comparison
to those in (iPrPDI)Fe(CO)2 (1946, 1888 cm−1),24 suggesting
a greater π acidity of pyrazine in comparison to pyridine,
therefore reducing back-bonding to the carbonyl ligands. The
increased π acidity of the pyrazine is also reflected in the redox
potentials of 4 and 9. Proligand 4 displays a reversible
reduction wave in THF solution at a peak potential of −2.36 V
suggests an important contribution from the resonance
27
structure consisting of direduced (PPzDI)•2−
.
In line with
this interpretation, 15N NMR of the imine nitrogen atom (N
C) also shows a significant upfield shift in complex 9 (δN
250.8), in comparison to that in the free ligand 4 (δN 345.8),
suggesting an accumulation of charge density on this site.
Nevertheless, this phenomenon could be also ascribed to
strong back-bonding from an electron-rich Fe(0) center to the
PPzDI ligand, and not necessarily to ligand reduction.
C
Inorg. Chem. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX