of the 1,2,3-triazole ring can facilitate its conversion to the
carbene species 4 (Scheme 1). This route significantly
expands the repertoire of accessible azavinyl carbenes
and allows practical access to synthetically useful second-
ary amines, which are difficult to obtain by other methods.
Ethyl 1,2,4-triazolyl-1,2,3-triazoles 34 (see Supporting
Information for the preparation procedure) were found to
readily produce azavinyl carbenes 4 that reacted with
olefins. Thus, in the presence of the Rh2(esp)2 complex,5
styrene was converted to cyclopropane carboxaldehyde 5a
in 82% isolated yield (trans/cis ratio 3:1; Scheme 2). The
Rh2(piv)4 catalyst provided the product aldehyde with
similarly low diastereoselectivity as well as a somewhat
lower yield (66%). In contrast, the same reaction carried
out with the Rh2(S-NTTL)4 catalyst gave 5a in 84% yield
and 80% ee with a significantly improved trans/cis ratio
(5:50 > 20:1). The low diastereoselectivity observed in
reactions catalyzed by Rh2(piv)4 and Rh(esp)2 suggests
that it is determined not only by the donorꢀacceptor
electronic properties of these carbenes but also by the steric
demands of the imine group, as compared to the sulfonyl
azavinyl carbenes2d and those derived from diazoacetates.
Optimization of the reaction conditions revealed that Rh2-
(S-NTTL)4 performed better than other catalysts, giving
cyclopropane products with a high 95% ee (dr > 20:1;
65 °C in CHCl3).
Hydrolysis of the intermediate imine confirmed both the
relative and absolute stereochemistry of the cyclopropane
products. These results correlate well with our prior find-
ings for reactions of 1-sulfonyl-1,2,3-triazoles, in which
Rh2(S-NTTL)4 also gave excellent asymmetric induction
inchloroformand1,2-DCE.2b,c Itisworth mentioning that
performing the reaction at an elevated temperature did not
affect its enantio- and diastereoselectivity.
Scheme 3. Rh2(S-NTTL)4-Catalyzed Enantio- and Diastereo-
selective Cyclopropanation of Alkenes with Triazoles 3a
Scheme 2. Cyclopropanation of Styrene with Triazole 3a Cata-
lyzed by Rh(II) Carboxylates
Other chiral Rh(II) carboxylates were then evaluated in
the cyclopropanation reaction (cf. Table S2 of the Sup-
porting Information). However, instead of removing the
5-amino-1,2,4-triazolyl group, we carried out the one-pot
reduction of the intermediate imine in order to access
valuable heterocyclic secondary amine 6a. Most chiral
catalysts showed excellent diastereoselectivity (dr >20:1)
compared to 3:1 obtained for Rh2(esp)2. As for the en-
a All reactions were performed at 75 °C except for compounds 6a
and 6b, which were obtained at 65 °C. bAt 40% conversion.
When other alkenes and triazoles 3 were examined in the
reactionwithRh2(S-NTTL)4, excellent diastereoselectivity
and good enantioselectivity were a general trend for this
type of carbene (Scheme 3).
The only downside of using the Rh2(S-NTTL)4 catalyst
was the increased reaction time(24 h). Electron-rich olefins
(4-methoxystyrene and 1,1-diphenylethylene) produced
substituted 2-pyrrolines instead of cyclopropanes in good
yields.2b Reactions of triazoles 3 with aromatic and ali-
phatic nitriles provide substituted triazolylimidazoles 7.
These compounds are likely formed via the initial attack of
the nitrile nitrogen at the electrophilic carbene center.
Screening of several readily available achiral Rh(II) car-
boxylates and solvents in the reaction of 3a with benzoni-
trile revealed that Rh2(esp)2 was the most effective catalyst
for this transannulation reaction. Although the imidazole
6
antioselectivity, Rh2(S-NTTL)4 and Rh2(S-PTAD)4
emerged as the most promising catalysts after the initial
screening, which was performed in 1,2-DCE at 80 °C.
Rh2(S-DOSP)4 and Rh2(R-NTV)4 provided 6a as an
opposite enantiomer with 38% and 66% ee, respectively.
(4) Xia, F.; Li, W.; Qu, F.; Fan, Z.; Liu, X.; Berro, C.; Rauzy, E.;
Peng, L. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 1695.
(5) Espino, C. G.; Fiori, K. W.; Kim, M.; Du Bois, J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2004, 126, 15378.
€
(6) (a) Muller, P.; Bernardinelli, G.; Allenbach, Y. F.; Ferri, M.;
€
Flack, H. D. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1725. (b) Muller, P.; Lacrampe, F.;
Bernardinelli, G. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14, 1503.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 18, 2011
4871