COMMUNICATION
The scope of the reaction was explored by using a variety
of a-keto esters 4a–i, including aliphatic (Table 2, entries 1,
3–9), trifluoromethyl-substituted (Table 2, entry 2), aromatic
(Table 2, entries 10–13) and heteroaromatic derivatives
(Table 2, entries 14 and 15). The collected data indicate that
the reaction is highly efficient for all types of substrate, with
the more-reactive 4a,b,d,e reacting at room temperature to
reach high conversions and yields of adducts 5a,b,d,e in
short reaction times (Table 2, entries 1,2,5, and 6, respective-
ly). In the case of less-reactive substrates 4c,f–i, longer reac-
tion times were required and poorer conversions and yields
were achieved (Table 2, entries 3, 8, 10, 12, and 14, respec-
tively). However, the addition of a catalytic amount of 6 sig-
nificantly improved the reactivity, leading to better yields of
products 5c,f–i in reduced reaction times (Table 2, entries 4,
9, 11, 13, and 15). Analytically pure samples were obtained
by chromatographic purification using organic solvents, but
a representative experiment was also performed to explore
the possibility of avoiding organic solvents: the model sub-
strate 4e was reacted with 1.3 equivalents of 2. As this re-
agent has a low boiling point (50–558C at 200 Torr),[6] the
slight excess of 2 was removed upon concentration and
drying of the product in vacuo (Table 2, entry 7). In this
way, nearly pure 5e (>90% by GC analysis, see the
1H NMR spectrum in the Supporting Information) was ob-
tained without using any organic solvents.
Scheme 2. Reactivity of FDAHs 1–3 toward a-keto ester 4e.
tries 1 and 2). Further activation of 4e by addition of 1,3-
bisACHTUNGTRENNUNG[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]thiourea (6) as a catalyst
was also attempted unsuccessfully (Table 1, entry 3). In
sharp contrast, however, pyrrolidine derivative 2 exhibited,
as expected,[12]
a relatively higher reactivity (Table 1,
Table 1. Selected preliminary experiments.[a]
Entry
Solvent
Reagent
Cat. 6 [%]
t [h]
Conv. [%][b]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
Toluene
MeOH
1
3
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
–
–
10
–
–
–
10
–
–
168
168
168
72
24
24
72
3
3
24
3
3
24
<5
<5
<5
29
4
15
CH2Cl2
56
H2O[c]
>99
<5
15
<5
10
9
neat
neat
The significant increase in reactivity suggests the active
participation of water in the reaction mechanism, beyond
any hydrophobic effect or solvation phenomena that might
also be used to explain the above results. This hypothesis is
in agreement with the recently proposed acid-catalysis
mechanism,[15] and experimental support was also obtained
from the comparison of the reaction rates in pure water and
10
11
12
13
CH2Cl2/H2O[d]
THF/H2O[d]
THF/H2O[d]
–
–
–
52
[a] Experimental conditions: Hydrazone (0.5 mmol) was added to a solu-
tion of keto ester 4e (1 mmol) in 1.0 mL of solvent. [b] Determined by
1H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixtures. [c] An emulsion was
formed. [d] 1:1 mixture. [e] Homogeneous reaction, 1:1 mixture.
1
deuterium oxide. Thus, monitoring the reaction by H NMR
spectroscopy revealed a considerable solvent kinetic isotope
entry 4). Further experiments were performed in toluene
and methanol to identify any relevant solvent effect
(Table 1, entries 5 and 6). However, these experiments indi-
cated a limited reactivity in most cases, with the reaction re-
quiring a long time to reach reasonable conversion rates.
The addition of 6 as the catalyst produced a noticeable im-
provement for the reaction performed in dichloromethane
(Table 1, entry 7), but the required reaction times were still
too long. Finally, we decided to explore the possibility of
performing the reaction “on water”, that is, exploiting the
rate acceleration observed for some organic reactions when
carried out in aqueous suspension.[13,14] To our delight, the
reaction of 4e with 2 performed using pure water as the re-
action medium reached complete conversion after only
3 hours at room temperature, without the need of any cata-
lyst or co-solvent (Table 1, entry 8). Further experiments
were conducted to understand the nature of the activation.
When the reaction was carried out in the absence of solvent
(Table 1, entries 9 and 10), in a 1:1 dichloromethane/water
mixture (Table 1, entry 11), and in other aqueous (yet homo-
geneous) conditions (Table 1, entries 12 and 13), the relative
lack of reactivity supported the proposed “on water” effect.
effect as estimated from the observed half-lives of 2 in its re-
action with 4e using H2O (t1/2 =82 min) and D2O (t1/2
=
140 min) as reaction media.
ꢀ
This fact reveals that the cleavage of at least one O H(D)
bond takes place in the rate-limiting step. On the other
hand, the poor reactivity observed in methanol could be ten-
tatively explained by an activation mechanism in which the
two protons of water are involved. In line with this analysis,
it can be tentatively proposed that water behaves as a cata-
lyst binding the two reagents together whilst acting as a
proton source for the acidic activation of the carbonyl
group, as depicted in Scheme 3. According to this model, a
ternary complex I would be initially formed, from which the
ꢀ
C C bond-formation takes place simultaneously with the
cleavage of a water molecule to yield a diazenium-hydroxide
intermediate II in the rate-limiting step. This zwitterionic in-
termediate, stabilized by a N,O electrostatic interaction,
would then easily afford product 5 after deprotonation of
the methylene group with the regeneration of a molecule of
water. The proposed association of water with the hydra-
zone sp2 N atom has been previously proposed to explain
the reactivity of related hydrazones in hydrocyanation reac-
2288
ꢃ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chem. Asian J. 2011, 6, 2287 – 2290