Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
HRMS ESI calculated for C18H22BNO2: m/z 295.1853, found:
295.1856.
The dependence of oxime stereochemistry on the effi-
ciency of electrocyclization of azatrienes is intriguing and has
not been documented to our knowledge. The reason could be
steric in nature and related to the lower reactivity of (Z)-1-
substituted butadienes in Diels–Alder reactions.[11] Further
investigations as to the underlying causes of this phenomenon
are currently underway.
Keywords: boronic esters · diboration · electrocyclic reactions ·
nitrogen heterocycles · synthetic methods
How to cite: Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 5834–5836
Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 5928–5930
The potential of the heterocyclic boronic esters to be
further exploited for synthesis was next investigated by
employing two representative organoboron transformations.
Specifically, as highlighted in Scheme 6, compound 14 was
oxidized to the corresponding phenol 31 or could be
converted into azido product 32 in good yield in both cases.
[1] Boronic Acids: Preparation and Applications in Organic Syn-
thesis Medicine and Materials, Vol. 1, 2nd ed. (Ed.: D. G. Hall),
Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2011.
[2] For selected examples, see: a) T. Ishiyama, M. Murata, N.
Barnard, T. B. Marder, J. M. Murphy, J. F. Hartwig, Chem. Rev.
M. J. Ingleson, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 2102; Angew.
Chem. 2011, 123, 2150.
[3] a) S. P. J. T. Bachollet, J. F. Vivat, D. C. Cocker, H. Adams,
J. P. A. Harrity, J. Jiang, A. J. H. M. Meijer, A.-C. M. A. Nassoy,
Leboeuf, S. Amslinger, K. P. C. Vollhardt, M. Malacria, C.
3712; f) H. Wang, C. Grohmann, C. Nimphius, F. Glorius, J. Am.
[4] a) D. J. Faizi, A. Issaian, A. J. Davis, S. A. Blum, J. Am. Chem.
Scheme 6. Representative functionalization reactions of 14.
DCM=CH2Cl2.
In conclusion we report a new and efficient synthesis of
pyridine-based heteroaromatic boronic acid derivatives
through a novel diboration/6p-electrocyclization pathway.
This strategy allows rapid access to bicyclic pyridines,
although the suitability of this method to access monocyclic
heterocycles will likely require further method development.
Moreover, this method has raised an intriguing result that the
cyclization of oxime-derived trienes appears to depend on the
substrate stereochemistry. Further studies to establish the
generality of this observation together with the underlying
causes are underway and will be reported in due course.
b) T. Hosokawa, N. Shimo, K. Maeda, A. Sonoda, S.-I. Muraha-
A. Hirata, M. Sera, Y. Takahashi, J. Nobuhiro, S. Hibino, Chem.
[6] For related examples involving in situ generation of unsaturated
oximes, see: a) D. A. Colby, R. G. Bergman, J. A. Ellman, J. Am.
[7] T. Ishiyama, N. Matsuda, N. Miyaura, A. Suzuki, J. Am. Chem.
6331; b) H. Prokopcovµ, J. Ramírez, E. Fernµndez, C. O. Kappe,
[9] Further details are contained within the Supporting Information.
[11] We thank a reviewer for this suggestion. For an example of
comparative Diels – Alder reactions of E/Z-1-substituted buta-
dienes, see : H. Adams, J. C. Anderson, R. Bell, D. N. Jones,
Experimental Section
Typical diboration/electrocyclization procedure as exemplified by the
formation of 14: B2pin2 (640 mg, 2.5 mmol) was added to a stirred
solution of (E)-2-(2-cyclopropylethynyl)benzaldehyde O-methyl
oxime (456 mg, 2.3 mmol) in toluene (15 mL). Then [Pt(PPh3)4]
(132 mg, 0.12 mmol, 5 mol%) was added and the reaction was stirred
at 1208C for 1 h. The reaction mixture was allowed to cool to room
temperature and 1,2-Cl2C6H4 was added (30 mL). The reaction
mixture was stirred at 2008C for a further 16 h. The solution was
allowed to cool to room temperature and was filtered through a pad
of silica gel. The residue was purified by flash column chromatog-
raphy on silica gel eluting with petroleum ether (40/60 v/v) and ethyl
acetate to afford 3-cyclopropyl-4-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxabor-
1
olan-2-yl)isoquinoline 14 (480 mg, 71%) as an orange oil. H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3): d = 9.09 (s, 1H), 8.11 (dd, J = 8.5, 1.0 Hz, 1H),
7.84 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.62 (ddd, J = 8.5, 7.0, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.45 (ddd,
J = 8.0, 7.0, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 2.61–2.54 (m, 1H), 1.49 (s, 12H), 1.22–1.18
(m, 2H), 1.02–0.96 ppm (m, 2H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): d =
160.7, 153.8, 139.5, 130.4, 128.0, 126.3, 126.1, 125.5, 84.3, 25.0, 16.6,
9.9 ppm; 11B NMR (128 MHz, CDCl3): d = 32.8 ppm (br); FTIR: u =
Received: January 30, 2016
Revised: February 19, 2016
Published online: April 5, 2016
2978 (m), 1619 (m), 1562 (m), 1495 (m), 1235 (s), 1134 (s) cmÀ1
.
5836
ꢀ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 5834 –5836