employed to get the highest photoresponsivity is very low
compared to the light power used in previous reports.14–16
Remarkably, the photoresponsivity (R) of microribbons is
much higher than that of inorganic single-crystalline silicon
TFTs (300 AWÀ1, I = 400 mW cmÀ2).14 Although the PLQY
of the thin film shows an identical response to that of the
microribbon, the R value (B420–430 AWÀ1) in the thin-film
based OPT is found to be much smaller than that of the
microribbon (Fig. 11S, ESIw). It is well known that the longer
exciton lifetime is closely associated with the efficient dissociation
of free charges with applied voltage.17 Since the fluorescence
lifetime (t) of the microribbon (0.44–0.57 ns) is greater than
that of film (0.12–0.16 ns), the large difference in lifetime (t)
supports the effective charge dissociation in microribbons.
To the best of our knowledge, the microribbon-based OPT
displays the highest photoresponsivity and photoswitching
ratio of dark- and photo-current for pyrene-based OPTs to
date under such low light intensity.12
Fig. 3 (a) Transfer curves of microribbon OPT in the dark (black)
and under monochromatic light irradiation (red) of 5.6 mW cmÀ2
(b) Photoresponsivity (R) and photoswitching ratio (P) vs. VG for
the OPT (inset: fluorescence images of thin film and crystalline
microribbons) (lex = 365 nm)).
.
This research was supported by the National Research
Foundation Program (No. 20100025252) and by Priority
Research Centers Program through the National Research
Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of
Education, Science and Technology (NRF2011-0018396).
the variable interfacial contact of the microribbon surface to
the dielectric layer. In case of TFT of PY-4(THB) (Fig. 2c,
inset) which was prepared by spin casting of a THF solution of
PY-4(THB) and used without further treatment, the mobility
value is 0.1 cm2 VÀ1 sÀ1 with on/off current ratio of 2.0 Â 106
and threshold voltage (VTH) of À10 V. The significant difference
in mobilities between the microribbon and film is attributed to
the highly crystalline packing structure in microribbon and
more efficient charge transporting channels organized in a slip-
stacked manner induced by J-aggregation, as described above.
Furthermore, the absolute PL quantum yields (PLQY) of
PY-4(THB) turned out to be 0.92, 0.14 and 0.14 in solution,
film and microribbon states, respectively (Fig. 10S, ESIw).
Because of the highly sensitive optical response of the micro-
ribbon, we observed a dramatic increase of the source–drain
current (IDS) with the microribbon-based phototransistor
(width = 8 mm, length = 40 mm) when illuminating incident
Notes and references
1 L. Zhang, L. Tan, Z. Wang, W. Hu and D. Zhu, Chem. Mater.,
2009, 21, 1993.
2 K. H. Jung, S. Y. Bae, K. H. Kim, M. J. Cho, K. Lee, Z. H. Kim,
D. H. Choi, D. H. Lee, D. S. Chung and C. E. Park, Chem.
Commun., 2009, 5290.
3 F. Silvestri, A. Marrocchi, M. Seri, C. Kim, T. J. Marks,
A. Facchetti and A. Taticchi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 6108.
4 P. Gao, D. Beckmann, H. N. Tsao, X. Feng, V. Enkelmann,
M. Baumgarten, W. Pisula and K. Mullen, Adv. Mater., 2009,
21, 213.
¨
5 S. J. Kang, I. Bae, Y. J. Park, T. H. Park, J. Sung, S. C. Yoon,
K. H. Kim, D. H. Choi and C. Park, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2009,
19, 1609.
6 Q. Tang, L. Jiang, Y. Tong, H. Li, Y. Liu, Z. Wang, W. Hu, Y. Liu
and D. Zhu, Adv. Mater., 2008, 20, 2947.
7 Z. Wei, W. Hong, H. Geng, C. Wang, Y. Liu, R. Li, W. Xu,
Z. Shuai, W. Hu, Q. Wang and D. Zhu, Adv. Mater., 2010,
22, 2458.
light
dark
light with very low intensity ((IDS
À IDSdark)/IDS
=
1.2 Â 106, VG = À13.5 V, lex = 400 nm, I = 5.6 mW cmÀ2
)
(Fig. 3a). Obviously, photoinduced charge carriers were
generated in the molecular orbital levels through the efficient
absorption of light. The photoinduced electrons may be readily
trapped in the bulk and interface between the active and
insulating layers; then, photoinduced hole transports were
facilitated dominantly. The accumulated charges in the inter-
face regions through the gate bias (VG) and the excited charges
induced by the photo-irradiation both contributed to the rapid
increase of IDS in the active layer.
8 L. Jiang, W. Hu, Z. Wei, W. Xu and H. Meng, Adv. Mater., 2009,
21, 3649.
9 M. Mas-Torrent, P. Hadley, S. T. Bromley, X. Ribas, J. Tarres,
´
M. Mas, E. Molins, J. Veciana and C. Rovira, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2004, 126, 8546.
10 H. Zhang, Y. Wang, K. Shao, Y. Liu, S. Chen, W. Qiu, X. Sun,
T. Qi, Y. Ma, G. Yu, Z. Su and D. Zhu, Chem. Commun., 2006,
755.
11 M. Ashizawa, K. Yamada, A. Fukaya, R. Kato, K. Hara and
J. Takeya, Chem. Mater., 2008, 20, 4883.
12 Y. Wang, H. Wang, Y. Liu, C.-A. Di, Y. Sun, W. Wu, G. Yu,
D. Zhang and D. Zhu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 13058.
13 G. Venkataramana and S. Sankararaman, Eur. J. Org. Chem.,
2005, 4162.
14 N. M. Johnson and A. Chiang, Appl. Phys. Lett., 1984, 45, 1102.
15 Q. Tang, L. Li, Y. Song, Y. Liu, H. Li, W. Xu, W. Hu and D. Zhu,
Adv. Mater., 2007, 19, 2624.
16 M. Y. Cho, S. J. Kim, Y. D. Han, D. H. Park, K. H. Kim,
D. H. Choi and J. Joo, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2008, 18, 2905.
17 Y. Guo, C. Du, G. Yu, C.-A. De, S. Jiang, H. Xi, J. Zheng, S. Yan,
C. Yu, W. Hu and Y. Liu, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2010, 20, 1019.
As shown in Fig. 3, we estimated the photoresponsivity
(R) for the OPT devices, defined as DIDSphoto/Pinc, where
photo
light
dark
DIDS
intensity. The photoswitching (photocurrent/dark-current)
= IDS
À IDS
and Pinc is the incident light
light
ratio ((IDS
À IDSdark)/IDSdark) was denoted as P. The
average values of the photoresponsivity (R) of microribbon
OPTs were found to be 1980–2000 A WÀ1 (VG = À13.5 V,
I = 5.6 mW cmÀ2). It should be noted that the light intensity
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 8907–8909 8909