Table 2 (Contd.)
Notes and references
Product (7)d
Yield (%)e
ee (%)f
1 For leading reviews on chiral diene ligands in asymmetric catalysis,
see: (a) F. Glorius, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 3364; (b) J. B.
Johnson and T. Rovis, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 840; (c) C.
Defieber, H. Gru¨tzmacher and E. M. Carreira, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2008, 47, 4482; (d) R. Shintani and T. Hayashi, Aldrichim. Acta, 2009,
42, 31; (e) C.-G. Feng, M.-H. Xu and G.-Q. Lin, Synlett, 2011, 10,
1345.
Entry
Boronic acid (6)
17
R = H
98
91
2 For selected examples of chiral diene ligands, see: (a) T. Hayashi, K.
Ueyama, N. Tokunaga and K. Yoshida, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125,
11508; (b) C. Ficsher, C. Defieber, T. Suzuki and E. M. Carreira, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 1628; (c) Z.-Q. Wang, C.-G. Feng, M.-H. Xu
and G.-Q. Lin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 5336; (d) T. Gendrineau,
O. Chuzel, H. Eijsberg, J.-P. Genet and S. Darses, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2008, 47, 7669; (e) Y. Luo and A. J. Carnell, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed., 2010, 49, 2750; (f) G. Pattison, G. Piraux and H. W. Lam, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 14373; (g) Q. Li, Z. Dong and Z.-X. Yu, Org.
Lett., 2011, 13, 1122; (h) X. Hu, M. Zhuang, Z. Cao and H. Du, Org.
Lett., 2009, 11, 4744; (i) X. Hu, Z. Cao, Z. Liu, Y. Wang and H. Du,
Adv. Synth. Catal., 2010, 352, 651; (j) Z. Cao and H. Du, Org. Lett.,
2010, 12, 2602; (k) Y. Wang, X. Hu and H. Du, Org. Lett., 2010, 12,
5482.
18
R = Me
PhB(OH)2
91
81
89
97
19b
3 (a) P. Maire, S. Deblon, F. Breher, J. Geier, C. Bo¨hler, H. Ru¨egger, H.
Scho¨nberg and H. Gru¨tzmacher, Chem.–Eur. J., 2004, 10, 4198; (b) R.
Shintani, W.-L. Duan, T. Nagano, A. Okada and T. Hayashi, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 4611; (c) P. Kasa´k, V. B. Arionb and M.
20b
21b
PhB(OH)2
R = n-C3H7
R = n-C5H11
88
84
60
60
a All the reactions were carried out with enone 5 (0.40 mmol), arylboronic
acid 6 (0.60 mmol), K3PO4·3H2O (0.030 mmol), [RhCl(C2H4)2]2 (0.006
mmol), ligand 4a (0.0144 mmol) in MeOH (1.5 mL) at 30 ◦C under argon
for 5 h unless other noted. b 5.0 mol % of catalyst and K3PO4·3H2O (7.5
mol %) as base. c 5.0 mol % of catalyst and CsF (0.6 mmol) as base. d The
absolute configuration was determined by comparing the optical rotation
with the reported one. e Yield based on enone 5. f The ee was determined
by chiral HPLC.
ˇ
Widhalm, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2006, 17, 3084; (d) P. Steˇpnicˇka
and I. C´ısarˇova´, Inorg. Chem., 2006, 45, 8785; (e) R. T. Stemmler and
C. Bolm, Synlett, 2007, 9, 1365; (f) C. Defieber, M. A. Ariger, P. Moriel
and E. M. Carreira, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 3139; (g) T.
Minuth and M. M. K. Boysen, Org. Lett., 2009, 11, 4212; (h) Z. Liu
and H. Du, Org. Lett., 2010, 12, 3054; (i) Z. Cao, Y. Liu, Z. Liu, X.
Feng, M. Zhuang and H. Du, Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 2164; (j) R. Shintani,
R. Naruo, Y. Tsutsumi, S. Hayashi and T. Hayashi, Chem. Commun.,
2011, 47, 6123.
4 (a) P. Maire, F. Breher, H. Scho¨nberg and H. Gru¨tzmacher,
Organometallics, 2005, 24, 3207; (b) B. T. Hahn, F. Tewes, R. Fro¨hlich
and F. Glorius, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 1143.
5 T. Thaler, L.-N. Guo, A. K. Steib, M. Raducan, K. Karaghiosoff, P.
Mayer and P. Knochel, Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 3182.
6 (a) S.-S. Jin, H. Wang and M.-H. Xu, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 7230;
(b) W.-Y. Qi, T.-S. Zhu and M.-H. Xu, Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 3410.
7 X. Feng, Y. Wang, B. Wei, J. Yang and H. Du, Org. Lett., 2011, 13,
3300.
8 For leading reviews on chiral sulfoxide ligands, see: (a) I. Ferna´ndez
and N. Khiar, Chem. Rev., 2003, 103, 3651; (b) M. C. Carren˜o, G.
Herna´ndez-Torres, M. Ribagorda and A. Urbano, Chem. Commun.,
2009, 6129.
9 For leading reviews on tert-butanesulfinamide, see: (a) J. A. Ellman,
T. D. Owens and T. P. Tang, Acc. Chem. Res., 2002, 35, 984; (b) J. A.
Ellman, Pure Appl. Chem., 2003, 75, 39; (c) F. Ferreira, C. Botuha, F.
Chemla, A. Pe´rez-Luna and J. A. Ellman, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38,
1162; (d) M. T. Robak, M. A. Herbage and J. A. Ellman, Chem. Rev.,
2010, 110, 3600.
The substrate scope for ligand 4a in Rh(I)-catalyzed 1,4-
additions was subsequently investigated. As shown in Table 2,
in most cases, it was found that ligand 4a was highly effective
for the reactions between 2-cyclohexenone (5a) and electron-rich
arylboronic acids to give the corresponding products in high
yields with excellent ee’s, but exhibited relatively lower activity for
electron-poor arylboronic acids where 5 mol % of catalyst loading
and/or 1.5 equiv of CsF were required (Table 2, entries 1–14).
Other cyclic enones are also suitable substrates for this reaction
to furnish the corresponding products in 81–98% yields with 89–
97% ee’s (Table 2, entries 17–19). It is worth noting that ligand
4a can be also applied to the Rh(I)-catalyzed asymmetric addition
of phenylboronic acid (6a) to linear enones to give the desired
adducts in good yields with moderate ee’s (Table 2, entries 20, 21).
10 For leading references on chiral ligands incoporated with tert-
butanesulfinamide, see: (a) T. D. Owens, F. J. Hollander, A. G. Oliver
and J. A. Ellman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 1539; (b) T. D. Owens,
A. J. Souers and J. A. Ellman, J. Org. Chem., 2003, 68, 3; (c) L. B.
Schenkel and J. A. Ellman, Org. Lett., 2003, 5, 545; (d) L. B. Schenkel
and J. A. Ellman, J. Org. Chem., 2004, 69, 1800; (e) H. Lai, Z. Huang,
Q. Wu and Y. Qin, J. Org. Chem., 2009, 74, 283; (f) D. Pei, Z. Wang, S.
Wei, Y. Zhang and J. Sun, Org. Lett., 2006, 8, 5913; (g) K. L. Tan and
E. N. Jacobsen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 1315; (h) Z. Huang,
H. Lai and Y. Qin, J. Org. Chem., 2007, 72, 1373; (i) M. T. Robak, M.
Trincado and J. A. Ellman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 15110; (j) L.
Zani, L. Eriksson and H. Adolfsson, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2008, 4655.
11 J. P. McMahon and J. A. Ellman, Org. Lett., 2005, 7, 5393.
12 (a) G. Liu, D. A. Cogan and J. A. Ellman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119,
9913; (b) G. Liu, D. A. Cogan, T. D. Owens, T. P. Tang and J. A. Ellman,
J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64, 1278; (c) D. A. Cogan and J. A. Ellman, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 268; (d) H. K. Chang, D. Y. Jung, M. K. Kim
and Y. H. Kim, Synlett, 2005, 304; (e) F. A. Davis, R. E. Reddy, J. M.
Szewczyk, G. V. Reddy, P. S. Portonovo, H. Zhang, D. Fanelli, P. Zhou
and P. J. Carroll, J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 2555.
Conclusion
In summary, a variety of chiral olefin/sulfinimide hybrid ligands
has been successfully developed by a simple one-step conden-
sation of a,b-unsaturated ketones and readily available (R)-tert-
butanesulfinamide. This novel type of ligands exhibited promising
activity and enantioselectivity for rhodium-catalyzed asymmetric
1,4-additions to afford the desired products in high yields with up
to 98% ee. The ease of synthesis and the diverse structures make
this type of ligands attractive for other transition-metal-catalyzed
asymmetric reactions.
Acknowledgements
This work was generously supported by the National Science
Foundation of China (20802079, 21072194), the National Basic
Research Program of China (2010CB833300).
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2011, 9, 5927–5929 | 5929
©