Scheme 1. Diastereoselective Cycloaddition
at generating a tertiary carbocation that might be trapped
bythe tetheredphenol toprovide the cyclicether. While the
idea of constructing an eight-membered ring in this fashion
seemed improbable, the mere existence of the natural
product gave this unconventional notion some credence.
However, to test the transformation we first required an
enantioselective construction of the corresponding ben-
zylic stereocenter.
Addition of MeMgBr (2 equiv) to the salicylaldehydes
14 or 15 (1.0 equiv, 0.1 M in Et2O, ꢀ40 °C) resulted in
sequential deprotonation of the phenol and addition to the
aldehyde (Scheme 1). The respective dianion underwent
monocarbonylation upon addition of Boc2O (1.1 equiv,
ꢀ40 °C) and β-elimination thereby leading to a short-lived
o-quinone methide intermediate (o-QM) that engaged the
nonracemic enol ether (ꢀ)-169 in a diastereoselective in-
verse-demand DielsꢀAlder reaction.10 Thus, three new
bonds were formed in a single pot. It appeared that the
aryl bromine substituent provided increased diastereocon-
trol as the chroman ketal 18 formed with >20:1 selectivity,
whereas its hydrido counterpart 17 afforded a 16:1 ratio.
Hydrolysis (camphorsulfonic acid, 0.1 equiv) of the ketal
provided the respective lactol epimers 19ꢀ20 in 90% yield
and returned the chiral alcohol that was recycled for
subsequent preparations of 16.
Figure 2. (i) Two (9, 10) of the twelve known helianuols (AꢀL)
and their terrestrial biosynthetic precursor. (ii) Prior synthesis of
10. (iii) Our proposed divergent biosynthetic pathway to 9 and 10.
plants, principally the sunflower Helianthus annuus that
deploys these compounds for phytotoxic alleopathic de-
fenses (Figure 2).6,7 However, among its members were
examples of six-, seven-, and eight-membered etherial ring
systems, all of which also displayed an additional phenol
and alcohol or alkene residues.
The supposed configurational differences and possible
biosynthetic similaries between the marine heliananes and
terrestrial heliannuols captured our interest. Macıas pre-
viously demonstrated a 7-exo-tet epoxide opening of 12 to
furnish the seven-membered ring present in six of the
heliannuols (B, C, D, F, I, J, Figure 2ii).8 While an
8-endo-tet epoxide opening had been proposed for the
biosynthesis,7b it seemed an unlikely strategy for the
five known eight-membered ring containing heliannuols
(A, G, H, K, L). We propose a biosynthetic pathway in
which curcuhydroquinone (11) undergoes oxidation to a
quinone, indiscriminate dihydroxylation of the tethered
olefin, and subsequent ketalization to produce the tricyclic
quinoid ketals 13. Reductive aromatization of one diaster-
eomer releases the secondary alcohol to afford heliannuol
A (9), whereas reduction of the other diastereomer releases
the tertiary alcohol to furnish heliannuol D (10).
After attempting several new processes aimed at con-
verting the masked aldehyde of 19 into the prenyl residue
found within 4 in a single pot, a transformation predicated
On the other hand, the origin oftheeight-memberedring
belonging to the heliananes (1ꢀ3) was more of a conun-
drum for us. The simplest explanation would be a direct
conversion of curcuphenol (4) to helianane (1), as pro-
posed by Crews. We therefore set out totest this hypothesis
by treatment of curcuphenol (4) to acidic conditions aimed
(9) Okimoto, Y.; Sakaguchi, S.; Ishii, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 68,
5225–5227.
(10) For prior examples of related cycloadditions, see: (a) Van de
Water, R. W.; Magdziak, D. J.; Chau, J. N.; Pettus, T. R. R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2000, 27, 6502–6503. (b) Jones, R. M.; Van de Water, R. W.;
Lindsey, C. C.; Pettus, T. R. R. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 10, 3435–3341.
(c) Selenski, C.; Mejorado, L. H.; Pettus, T. R. R. Synlett 2004, 6, 1101–
1103. (d) Selenski, C.; Pettus, T. R. R. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 26, 9196–
9203.
(11) Fleming, I.; Patterson, I. Synthesis 1979, 446–448.
(12) (a) Wang, S.; Gates, B. D.; Swenton, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56,
1979–1981. (b) Berard, D.; Jean, A.; Canesi, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007,
48, 8238–8241.
(7) (a) Macıas, F. A.; Varela, R. M.; Torres, A.; Milinillo, J. M. G.;
Fronzek, F. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 1999–2002. (b) Macıas, F. A.;
Molinillo, J. M. G.; Varella, R. M.; Torres, A.; Fronzek, F. D. J. Org.
Chem. 1994, 59, 8261–8266. (c) Macıas, F. A.; Varela, R. M.; Torres, A.;
Molinillo, J. M. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 4725–4728.
(8) Macıas, F. A.; Chinchilla, D.; Molinillo, J. M. G.; Marin, D.;
Varela, R. M.; Torres, A. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 1679–1683.
(13) Green, J.; Pettus, T. R. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 1603–
1608.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 20, 2011
5501