In conclusion, we have reported on the intriguing OFET behavior
of new solution processable 9,10-ter-anthrylene-ethynylenes func-
tionalised with carboethoxy (E1), carbobutoxy (E2), and carboctoxy
(E3) groups. The new compounds were investigated as organic
semiconductors in solution processed OFET devices, which showed
an intriguing activation by thermal annealing. In fact, very low field-
effect mobility was recorded for the as-spun films, while a very good
modulation and a 4 orders of magnitude higher field-effect mobility
crops up for E2 and E3-based devices after a mild annealing of the
active layer. The devices based on E3 showed the best figures of merit
(average mFET: 4.4 ꢀ 10ꢁ2 cm2 Vꢁ1 sꢁ1 and on/off ratios of 104). The
observed behavior was attributed to an increase in molecular order at
the interface between the annealed films and the gate dielectric, as
revealed by XSR characterization.
Part of this work has been supported by the SEED project ‘‘X-ray
synchrotron class rotating anode microsource for the structural
micro-imaging of nanomaterials and engineered biotissues (XMI-
LAB)’’- IIT protocol no. 21537 of 23/12/2009.
Notes and references
ꢁ
1 A. R. Murphy and J. M. J. Frechet, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 1066;
Y. Yamashita, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater., 2009, 10, 024313.
2 A. C. Arias, J. D. MacKenzie, I. McCulloch, J. Rivnay and A. Salleo,
Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 3; S. Allard, M. Forster, B. Souharce,
H. Thiem and U. Scherf, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 4070;
M. Mas-Torrent and C. Rovira, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2008, 37, 827.
3 T. Someya, A. Dodabalapur, J. Huang, K. C. See and H. E. Katz,
Adv. Mater., 2010, 22, 3799; M. E. Roberts, A. N. Sokolov and
Z. Bao, J. Mater. Chem., 2009, 19, 3351.
4 L. Torsi, G. M. Farinola, F. Marinelli, M. C. Tanese, O. H. Omar,
L. Valli, F. Babudri, F. Palmisano, P. G. Zambonin and F. Naso,
Nat. Mater., 2008, 7, 412.
Fig. 4 XSR (log scale) experimental curves for thin and thick E3 (A) and
E2 (B) films, and XRD (linear scale) experimental curves for E3 (A) and
E2 (B) films before and after annealing.
5 G. Romanazzi, F. Marinelli, P. Mastrorilli, L. Torsi, A. Sibaouih,
€ €
M. Raisanen, T. Repo, P. Cosma, G. P. Suranna and C. F. Nobile,
Tetrahedron, 2009, 65, 9833, and references therein.
6 J. E. Anthony, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 452.
7 J. E. Anthony, Chem. Rev., 2006, 106, 5028.
8 A. N. Aleshin, J. Y. Lee, S. W. Chu, J. S. Kim and Y. W. Park, Appl.
Phys. Lett., 2004, 84, 5382.
9 F. Silvestri, A. Marrocchi, M. Seri, C. Kim, T. J. Marks, A. Facchetti
and A. Taticchi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 6108.
10 A. Dell’Aquila, F. Marinelli, J. Tey, P. Keg, Y. M. Lam,
O. L. Kapitanchuk, P. Mastrorilli, C. F. Nobile, P. Cosma,
A. Marchenko, D. Fichou, S. G. Mhaisalkar, G. P. Suranna and
L. Torsi, J. Mater. Chem., 2008, 18, 786.
11 F. Marinelli, A. Dell’Aquila, L. Torsi, J. Tey, G. P. Suranna,
P. Mastrorilli, G. Romanazzi, C. F. Nobile, S. G. Mhaisalkar,
N. Cioffi and F. Palmisano, Sens. Actuators, B, 2009, 140, 445.
12 P. Keg, A. Dell’Aquila, F. Marinelli, O. L. Kapitanchuk, D. Fichou,
P. Mastrorilli, G. Romanazzi, G. P. Suranna, L. Torsi, Y. M. Lam
and S. G. Mhaisalkar, J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20, 2448.
13 J. Pommerehne, H. Vestweber, W. Guss, R. F. Mark, H. Bassler,
M. Porsch and J. Daub, Adv. Mater., 1995, 7, 551.
14 D. M. De Leeuw, M. M. J. Simenon, A. R. Brown and
R. E. F. Einerhand, Synth. Met., 1997, 87, 53.
15 L. Zhang, C.-a. Di, G. Yu and Y. Liu, J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20,
7059, and references therein.
16 D. Braga and G. Horowitz, Adv. Mater., 2009, 21, 1473.
Concerning E2 (Fig. 4B), the stacking period derived from the XRD
data is 2.5 nm. The average bi-layer thicknesses estimated from the
simulation of XSR curves are therefore consistent with the d-spacings
derived from XRD analyses. Interestingly, similar trends in stacking
periodicity of the E2–E3 samples are observed for the d-spacings
derived by XSR and XRD analysis, which are in agreement with the
difference in molecular length of E2 with respect to E3. Moreover, the
simultaneous presence of both sharp diffraction peaks and reflectivity
fringes in the XSR curve of the not-annealed E3 thick sample (hardly
visible in the analogous E2 sample) suggests that thick crystalline
domains are present in the E3 film bulk, while a thin laterally
homogeneous bi-layered structure is formed close to the interface
with SiO2. The thickness of such a bi-layered structure seems to be
only slightly affected by the thickness of the deposited film, as shown
by the barely visible fringes in the reflectivity curves of the thicker
films.
The fact that this interface thin layer becomes more ordered after
thermal annealing in the case of the E3 and E2 samples, as testified by
the more intense observed reflectivity fringes (Fig. 3B), can be taken
as the direct cause of the dramatic mobility enhancement recorded for
OFET devices and provides further evidence of the fact that in OFET
two dimensional transport occurs at the interface between the organic
layer and the gate dielectric.18
ꢁ
17 U. Pietsch, V. Holy and T. Baumbach, High Resolution X-Ray
Scattering: From Thin Films to Lateral Nanostructures, Springer-
Verlag, New York, 2nd edn, 2004.
18 A. Dodabalapur, L. Torsi and H. E. Katz, Science, 1995, 268, 270;
F. Dinelli, M. Murgia, P. Levy, M. Cavallini, F. Biscarini and
D. M. de Leeuw, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2004, 92, 116802, and references
therein.
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 15186–15189 | 15189