5748
N. Kojima et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 5745–5749
R1
Committee of New Anticancer Agents supported by a Grant-in-
R1
O
F
R2
Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Area ‘Cancer’ from The Min-
istry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan
(MEXT). This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Young Sci-
entists (B) [No. 21790113, 23790130], a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research (B) [No. 22390021], and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Re-
search on Innovative Areas [No. 22136006] from The Ministry of
Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.
R2
H
O
O
O
R1 = H or F
R2 = H or F
Scheme 6. E2 elimination of HF moiety in c-fluorinated-methyl a,b-unsaturated c-
lactone.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
also synthesized from 20 or 23 using the same procedure as that
for 2, respectively.17
Synthesized C35-fluorinated solamins (2–4) were tested for
in vitro antiproliferative activity against a panel of 39 human can-
cer cell lines (JFCR39).18 Figure 3 shows the 50% growth inhibitory
References
1. Jolad, S. D.; Hoffmann, J. J.; Schram, K. H.; Cole, J. R.; Tempesta, M. S.; Kriek, G.
R.; Bates, R. B. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 3151.
2. For a recent review of Annonaceous acetogenins, see: Liaw, C.-C.; Wu, T.-Y.;
Chang, F.-R.; Wu, Y.-C. Planta Med. 2010, 76, 1390.
3. For a recent review of the total synthesis of Annonaceous acetogenins, see: Li,
N.; Shi, Z.; Tang, Y.; Chen, J.; Li, X. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2008, 4, 48.
4. For a recent review of the synthesis of acetogenin analogues, see: Kojima, N.;
Tanaka, T. Molecules 2009, 14, 3621.
5. Kojima, N.; Hayashi, H.; Suzuki, S.; Tominaga, H.; Maezaki, N.; Tanaka, T.;
Yamori, T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 6451.
6. (a) Morré, R. D.; de Cabo, J.; Farley, C.; Oberlies, N. H.; McLaughlin, J. L. Life Sci.
1995, 56, 343; (b) Wolvetang, E. J.; Johnson, K. L.; Krauer, K. S.; Ralph, J.;
Linnane, A. W. FEBS Lett. 1994, 339, 40.
7. Nakanishi, S.; Abe, M.; Yamamoto, S.; Murai, M.; Miyoshi, H. Biochim. Biophys.
Acta 2011, 1807, 1170.
8. Derbré, S.; Gil, S.; Taverna, M.; Boursier, C.; Nicolas, V.; Demey-Thomas, E.;
Vinh, J.; Susin, S. A.; Hocquemiller, R.; Poupon, E. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008,
18, 5741.
9. Drahl, C.; Cravatt, B. F.; Sorensen, E. J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5788.
10. (a) Nakanishi, Y.; Chang, F.-R.; Liaw, C.-C.; Wu, Y.-C.; Bastow, K. F.;
Lee, K.-H. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 3185; (b) Sinha, S. C.; Keinan, E. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 4891; (c) Myint, S. H.; Cortes, D.; Laurens, A.;
Hocquemiller, R.; Leboeuf, M.; Cavé, A.; Cotte, J.; Quéro, A.-M. Phytochemistry
1991, 30, 3335.
11. For the total synthesis of solamin, see: (a) Kojima, N.; Morioka, T.; Urabe, D.;
Yano, M.; Suga, Y.; Maezaki, N.; Ohashi-Kobayashi, A.; Fujimoto, Y.; Maeda, M.;
Yamori, T.; Yoshimitsu, T.; Tanaka, T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 8630; (b)
Makabe, H.; Kuwabara, A.; Hattori, Y.; Konno, H. Heterocycles 2009, 78, 2369;
(c) Raghavan, S.; Subramanian, S. G.; Tony, K. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49,
1601; (d) Prestat, G.; Baylon, C.; Heck, M.-P.; Grasa, G. A.; Nolan, S. P.;
Mioskowski, C. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 5770; (e) Kuriyama, W.; Ishigami, K.;
Kitahara, T. Heterocycles 1999, 50, 981; (f) Makabe, H.; Tanaka, A.; Oritani, T. J.
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1994, 1975; (g) Trost, B. M.; Shi, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1994, 116, 7459.
12. (a) Maezaki, N.; Kojima, N.; Tanaka, T. Synlett 2006, 993; (b) Kojima, N.
Yakugaku Zasshi 2004, 124, 673; (c) Kojima, N.; Maezaki, N.; Tominaga, H.;
Yanai, M.; Urabe, D.; Tanaka, T. Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 672; (d) Kojima, N.;
Maezaki, N.; Tominaga, H.; Asai, M.; Yanai, M.; Tanaka, T. Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9,
4980; (e) Maezaki, N.; Kojima, N.; Tominaga, H.; Yanai, M.; Tanaka, T. Org. Lett.
2003, 5, 1411; (f) Maezaki, N.; Kojima, N.; Asai, M.; Tominaga, H.; Tanaka, T.
Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2977.
13. (a) Kojima, N.; Morioka, T.; Yano, M.; Suga, Y.; Maezaki, N.; Tanaka, T.
Heterocycles 2009, 79, 387; (b) Kojima, N.; Fushimi, T.; Maezaki, N.; Tanaka, T.;
Yamori, T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 1637; (c) Maezaki, N.; Urabe, D.;
Yano, M.; Tominaga, H.; Morioka, T.; Kojima, N.; Tanaka, T. Heterocycles 2007,
73, 159; (d) Tominaga, H.; Maezaki, N.; Yanai, M.; Kojima, N.; Urabe, D.; Ueki,
R.; Tanaka, T. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 1422; (e) Maezaki, N.; Tominaga, H.;
Kojima, N.; Yanai, M.; Urabe, D.; Ueki, R.; Tanaka, T.; Yamori, T. Chem. Eur. J.
2005, 11, 6237; (f) Maezaki, N.; Tominaga, H.; Kojima, N.; Yanai, M.; Urabe, D.;
Tanaka, T. Chem. Commun. 2004, 406.
concentration relative to control (GI50). C35–CH2F-solamin
2
showed stronger growth inhibitory activity against a larger num-
ber of cancer cell lines than solamin 1. C35–CHF2-solamin 3 also
showed a similar tendency although the number of cell lines inhib-
ited by 3 is less than that inhibited by C35–CH2F-solamin 2.
In contrast, C35–CF3-solamin 4 displayed weaker cytotoxicity
than not only analogues 2 and 3 but also solamin 1. We also noted
interesting features in the fingerprints of fluorinated analogues 2–
4. For example, the inhibitory activity against human lung carci-
noma cells, NCI-H23 (GI50
>100 M for 4) and DMS114 (GI50: 6.9
M for 4), or human prostate carcinoma cells, PC-3 (GI50
M for 2; 60.0 M for 3; >100 M for 4), decreased as the
:
12.3
lM
for 2; 75.0
lM
for 3;
l
l
M for 2; 24.0
lM for 3;
75.0
24.0
l
l
:
l
l
number of fluorine atoms increased. These results did not support
our hypothesis for the mode of action described above because the
increase in the number of fluorine atoms on the
c-lactone ring
should decrease the LUMO levels of electrophiles, and chemical
reactivity and bioactivity should increase if our hypothesis is rea-
sonable. One of the possible reasons for this contradiction is that
the actual structures of the fluorinated analogues when they inter-
act with the target molecules differ among three fluorinated ana-
logues because
may be transformed into
by the E2 elimination of the HF moiety (Scheme 6).19
c
-fluorinated-methyl
a
,b-unsaturated
c
c
-lactone
-lactone
c-methylidene
a,b-unsaturated
Another possibility is that the nucleophile of the target protein
must approach the -lactone moiety of the analogues from the same
c
side as the fluorinated methyl group when the fluorinated analogues
interact with the target protein, perhaps, because of three-dimen-
sional restriction. A sterically demanding and/or electron-rich20 tri-
fluoromethyl group may inhibit the interaction between the target
protein and the c-lactone moiety of the analogues. To verify this
hypothesis, the synthesis of C35-epi-CF3-solamin is under way.
The differences of the detoxification and the effect to the distribu-
tion inside the cells are also thought as other factors.
In conclusion, the convergent synthesis of three C35-fluorinated
analogues of solamin, a mono-THF acetogenin, has been achieved
by the Sonogashira coupling of the THF fragment and the fluori-
nated
atoms on the
ity against human cancer cell lines, indicating that the
moiety in acetogenins may play an important role in the interac-
tion between acetogenins and the target molecules. Further work
aimed at the synthesis of fluorinated analogues and their detailed
biological studies is under way.
c
-lactone fragment. We revealed that the number of fluorine
-lactone moiety affects the growth inhibitory activ-
-lactone
14. Dudley, G. B.; Danishefsky, S. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2399.
15. Kawakami, Y.; Asai, T.; Umeyama, K.; Yamashita, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 3581.
16. Xu, Y.; Prestwich, G. D. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 7158.
c
c
17. Characterization data of C35–CH2F-solamin 2: pale yellow powder; mp
78.5ꢀ80.5 °C; ½a D21
ꢁ
+24.5 (c 1.08, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) d: 0.88
(t, 3H, J = 7.3 Hz), 1.26ꢀ1.43 (m, 40H), 1.47ꢀ1.55 (m, 2H), 1.56 (qn, 2H,
J = 7.3 Hz), 1.64ꢀ1.72 (m, 2H), 1.95ꢀ2.02 (m, 2H), 2.31 (t, 2H, J = 7.3 Hz), 2.47
(br, 2H), 3.41 (td, 2H, J = 6.1, 4.9 Hz), 3.80 (td, 2H, J = 7.3, 6.1 Hz), 4.51 (ddd, 1H,
J = 46.4, 9.8, 4.9 Hz), 4.62 (ddd, 1H, J = 47.6, 9.8, 3.7 Hz), 5.10 (br d, 1H,
J = 19.5 Hz), 6.99 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) : 14.0, 22.6, 25.3, 25.5 (2C),
27.2, 28.7 (2C), 29.0, 29.2, 29.3, 29.40, 29.49, 29.51 (4C), 29.55, 29.56, 29.58,
29.60, 29.65 (2C), 31.8, 33.3 (2C), 74.0 (2C), 79.0 (d, J = 21.6 Hz), 81.4 (d,
J = 176 Hz), 82.7 (2C), 137.1, 142.3 (d, J = 6.1 Hz), 172.9; IR (neat) cmꢀ1: 3453,
2916, 2849, 1757; MS (FAB) m/z: 583 [M+H]+; HRMS (FAB) m/z: calcd for
Acknowledgments
In vitro antiproliferative activities of C35-fluorinated solamins
against human cancer cell lines were examined by the Screening
C
35H64FO5: 583.4738; found: 583.4740 [M+H]+.