Journal of Natural Products
Article
assignable to three carboxyl carbons (δ 175.4, 175.3, 172.9) and
four anomeric carbons (δ 103.6, 101.7, 99.9, 98.1). These data
indicated that 1 is composed of 1 mol each of 2-methylbutyric
acid, nilic acid, and soldanellic acid B and that three ester
groups exist in the molecule; hence, the carboxyl group of the
aglycone 11S-hydroxyhexadecanoic (11S-jalapinolic) acid of 1
is also linked intramolecularly with a hydroxy group of the
sugar moiety to form a macrocyclic ester structure, as in already
known jalapins.6 The presence of the macrocyclic ester
structure was supported by the nonequivalent signals due to
H2-2 of the jalapinoloyl unit (Jla) of 1 observed at δ 2.71 (1H,
ddd, J = 2.5, 15.5, 15.5 Hz) and 2.61 (1H, ddd, J = 4.5, 4.5, 15.5
Hz), whereas the methyl ester5 of soldanellic acid B exhibited
the equivalent signal due to H2-2 of Jla at δ 2.32 (2H, t, J = 7.5
Glc′, respectively. Taking the J values of signals due to the
anomeric and methine protons of the sugar moiety into account,
the conformations of the quinovopyranosyl and glucopyranosyl
4
units were C1 and that of the rhamnopyranosyl unit was
1
concluded to be C4. The configurations of the component
2-methylbutyric acid and nilic acid units of the crude resin
glycoside fraction of this plant have been determined previously
as S and 2S,3S, respectively.5 Accordingly, the structure of 1 was
assigned as 11S-jalapinolic acid 11-O-(2-O-2S,3S-niloyl)-α-L-
rhamnopyranosyl-(1→2)-[O-(3-O-2S-methylbutyryl)-β-D-glu-
copyranosyl-(1→3)]-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-(1→2)-β-D-qinovo-
pyranoside, intramolecular 1,2⁗-ester.
Compound 2 (calysolin II) was obtained as an amorphous
powder and furnished tiglic acid, 2-methylbutyric acid, nilic
7
5
1
1
Hz) in the H NMR spectrum.
acid, and calysolic acid A on alkaline hydrolysis. The H and
13C NMR spectra of 2 indicated that 2 is composed of 1 mol
each of tiglic acid, nilic acid, and calysolic acid A and 2 mol of
2-methylbutyric acid. Further, a [M − H]− ion peak observed
at m/z 1381 in the negative-ion FABMS of 2 and the
In order to clarify the positions of the ester linkages, the
1H NMR signals due to the sugar moiety of 1 were assigned on
the basis of 1H−1H COSY, HMQC, and HMBC spectra. On com-
parison of the chemical shifts of signals due to the sugar moieties
between 1 and soldanellic acid B methyl ester,5 downfield shifts
(Δδ = δ(1) − δ(soldanellic acid B methyl ester)) owing to
acylation were seen for signals due to H-2 (Δδ = 1.09) of
rhamnosyl unit (Rha), H-2 (Δδ = ca. 1.53) and H-3 (Δδ =
1.73) of the second glucosyl unit (Glc′) in 1. Thus, the ester
linkages could be located at the OH-2 of Rha, the OH-2 of Glc′,
and the OH-3 of Glc′. The positions of each ester linkage of Jla,
Nla, and Mba were determined by negative-ion FABMS and the
HMBC spectrum of 1 and the HRFABMS of the peracetate
(1a) of 1. The fragment ion peaks at m/z 825 and 807 in the
negative-ion FABMS suggested that the ester linkage of Nla
might be placed at the OH-2 of Rha (Figure S22, Supporting
Information). However, the sites of the ester linkages of Mba
and Jla, both of which are in the Glc′ unit, were not discernible.
In the HMBC spectrum, a key cross peak was observed
between H-2 of Glc′ and C-1 of Jla, while the counterparts of
H-2 of Rha and H-3 of Glc′ could not be defined because the
13C NMR signals due to C-1 of Mba and C-1 of Nla appeared
at almost the same chemical shifts (Figure S23, Supporting
Information). The HRFABMS of 1a gave a fragment ion peak
at m/z 373.1500, which was ascribable to the fragment ion of a
2-O-2-methyl-3-acetoxybutyryl-3,4-O-diacetylrhamnopyranosyl
unit. Therefore, the ester linkages of Nla, Jla, and Mba could be
located at the OH-2 of Rha, the OH-2 of Glc′, and the OH-3 of
1
nonequivalent signals due to H2-2 of Jla in the H NMR
spectrum suggested that 2, like 1, has an intramolecular
macrocyclic ester structure.
1
The H NMR spectrum of 2 showed, in comparison with
that of calysolic acid A methyl ester,5 acylation shifts (Δδ =
δ(2) − δ(calysolic acid A methyl ester)) of signals due to H-2
(Δδ = 1.19) and H-4 (Δδ = 1.47) of Rha, H-3 (Δδ = 1.47) and
H-4 (Δδ = ca. 1.52) of Glc′, and H-2 (Δδ = ca. 1.45) of the
third glucose unit (Glc′′). Thus, the ester linkages of 2 could be
located at OH-2 and OH-4 of Rha, OH-3 and OH-4 of Glc′, and
OH-2 of Glc′′. The sites of each ester linkage of the 2-methyl-
butyryl, tigloyl (Tig), Nla, and Jla units were determined using the
HMBC spectrum of 2, with key cross peaks observed between
H-2 of Rha and C-1 of Nla, H-4 of Rha and C-1 of Tig, H-3 of
Glc′ and C-1 of Mba, H-4 of Glc′ and C-1 of the second
2-methylbutyryl unit (Mba′), and H-2 of Glc′′ and C-1 of Jla
(Figure S23, Supporting Information). Therefore, Nla, Tig,
Mba, Mba′, and Jla were attached to OH-2 of Rha, OH-4 of Rha,
OH-3 of Glc′, OH-4 of Glc′, and OH-2 of Glc′′, respectively.
These inferences were supported by the negative-ion FABMS of
2, in which fragment ion peaks were observed at m/z 1237,
1053 [1381 − 100 − 82 (Tig) − 146]− and 907 [1237 − 162 −
84 × 2]− (Figure S22, Supporting Information). Accordingly, the
structure of 2 was assigned as 11S-jalapinolic acid 11-O-(2-O-2S,
2415
dx.doi.org/10.1021/np2006378|J. Nat. Prod. 2011, 74, 2414−2419