J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 11749-11750
The Availability of Dysprosium Diiodide as a
11749
Powerful Reducing Agent in Organic Synthesis:
Reactivity Studies and Structural Analysis of
DyI2((DME)3 and Its Naphthalene Reduction
Product1
William J. Evans,* Nathan T. Allen, and Joseph W. Ziller
Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of California
IrVine, California 92697-2025
ReceiVed September 26, 2000
Figure 1. Structure of DyI2(DME)3 with thermal ellipsoids drawn at
the 50% probability level. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg):
Dy1-O1, 2.587(2); Dy1-O2, 2.603(2); Dy1-O3, 2.622(2) Dy1-I1,
3.2628(3); Dy2-O4, 2.585(2); Dy2-O5, 2.630(2); Dy2-O6, 2.678(21);
Dy2-I2, 3.2371(3); I1-Dy1-I1′, 157.322(12); I2-Dy2-I2,′ 180.000(9).
Metal-based reduction chemistry in organic synthesis may be
divided into two general regimes based on available reagents and
their reduction potentials.2 One class of reductants consists of
the extremely powerful reagents that allow Birch reductions,3 for
example, the alkali metals in liquid ammonia, NaK and Na(Hg)
alloys, and molten alkali metals. These are rather intolerant of
functional group diversity. Another class of reducing systems
involves SmI2(THF)x, which accommodates a wide range of
functional groups, but is less reducing.4 A variety of methods
have been used to increase the reduction potential of SmI2-
(THF)x,5,6 the most common being the addition of hexamethyl-
phosphoramide (HMPA). In addition, a new divalent lanthanide
reagent, TmI2(THF)x,7 has recently been reported which partially
narrows the gap between the Birch reductions and SmI2, since
Tm(II) is 0.8 V more reducing than Sm(II).8 Tm(II) reagents were
not considered earlier since it was only in 1997 that the first
molecular complex of this highly reactive ion was definitively
identified.9 The isolation of that complex, TmI2(DME)3, led to
the development of Tm(II) chemistry which now includes facile
and Dy(III) ions coincidentally have the same magnetic moment
and definitive structural data were elusive. Since several incorrect
claims of unusual oxidation states of f element complexes have
been made in the past based only on spectroscopy, we wanted
crystallographic confirmation of the existence this ion before its
use in organic synthesis was examined.
We report here the first crystallographic data on a molecular
complex of Dy(II) as well as a more convenient synthesis of solid
DyI2 that allows it to be stored as a solid and conveniently
solubilized for use in organic syntheses. We also describe some
preliminary reactions that demonstrate the utility of this reagent
in organic synthesis including the reduction of naphthalene.
Crystals of DyI2(DME)3,12 prepared by the method of Boch-
karev, were grown from DME at -20 °C in a nitrogen-containing
glovebox over a period of 36 h. These crystals were found to be
isomorphous with SmI2(DME)3.13 Since we were suspicious that
we could actually isolate such a reactive species, the same crystal
examined by X-ray diffraction was also examined by energy
dispersive absorption X-ray spectroscopy (EDAX) which con-
firmed that it was truly a dysprosium complex. DyI2(DME)3, like
its samarium analogue, has an unusual structure in which there
are two independent molecules in the unit cell, one of which has
a linear I-Dy-I component and the other which has a bent
I-Dy-I moiety, Figure 1. Each molecule has three chelating
DME ligands that generate a hexagonal bipyramidal geometry in
the linear I-Dy-I case and a distorted dodecahedral geometry
in the bent I-Dy-I system. This differs from the structure of
TmI2(DME)3 which contains one η1-DME and is 7-coordinate.8
This difference is consistent with the smaller radial size of Tm.14
Once the existence of DyI2(DME)3 was crystallographically
established, we sought a more convenient preparation that would
allow it to be used as a routine reagent. Solid DyI2 can be
conveniently prepared in multigram quantities by reacting dys-
prosium filings and iodine in an alumina or quartz crucible
contained within a quartz tube connected to a Schlenk line.15 The
solid mass of DyI2 that forms can be easily separated from residual
metal. The DyI2 can be crushed with a mortar and pestle under
an inert atmosphere and stored for long periods under nitrogen
until needed.
7
in situ synthesis of TmI2(THF)X analogous to the commonly
used SmI2(THF)2.4
To further narrow the gap between the Birch-type reductants
and the Sm(II)/Tm(II) reagents using lanthanide metals would
require access to Ln(II) ions significantly more difficult to isolate
than Tm(II). Although divalent ions of most of the lanthanides
have been reported to form under extreme conditions in solid-
state lattices,10 isolation of easily accessible, soluble forms that
would be used in organic synthesis seemed unlikely. However,
Bochkarev and co-workers have recently reported that a soluble
Dy(II) complex can be obtained from Dy/I2 reactions which occur
at temperatures up to 1500 °C.11 Although the analytical and
spectroscopic data were consistent with Dy(II), the existence of
this ion could not be established by magnetic data since the Dy(II)
(1) Presented in part at Contemporary Inorganic Chemistry II, College
Station, Texas, March 2000.
(2) Encyclopedia of Reagents for Organic Synthesis; L. A. Paquette, Ed.;
John Wiley: New York 1995.
(3) Rabideau, P. W.; Marcinow, Z. Org. React. 1992, 42, 1.
(4) For reviews, see: (a) Kagan, H. B.; Namy, J. L. Tetrahedron 1986,
42, 6573-6614. (b) Soderquist, J. A. Aldrichimica Acta 1991, 24, 15-23.
(c) Molander, G. A. Chem. ReV. 1992, 92, 29-68. (d) Krief, A.; Laval, A.
M. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 745-777. (e) Molander, G. A.; Harris, C. R. In
Encyclopedia of Reagents for Organic Synthesis; Paquette, L. A., Ed.;
Wiley: New York, 1995;Vol. 6, pp 4428-4432.
(5) Curran, D. P.; Hasegawa, E. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 5008-5010. (b)
Inanaga, J.; Ishikawa, M.; Yamaguchi, M. Chem. Lett. 1987, 1485. (c) Kagan,
H. B.; Namy, J.-L. In Lanthanides: Chemistry and use in Organic Synthesis;
Kobayashi, S., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, 1999, 156-198.
(6) (a) Otsubo, K.; Inanaga, J.; Yamaguchi, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986,
57, 4437. (b) Flowers, R. A.; Shabangi, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 1137-
1140.
(7) Evans, W. J.; Allen, N. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2118-2119.
(8) Aqueous LnIII/LnII reduction potentials (vs NHE): Dy (-2.5 V), Tm
(-2.3 V), and Sm (-1.55 V). See: Morss, L. R. Chem. ReV. 1976, 76, 827-
841.
(12) Experimental data for DyI2(DME)3: IR (Nujol): 1471m, 1444s, 1374s,
1301w, 1282w, 1239w, 1193w, 1116m, 1058s, 1027m, 860s, 722s cm-1; UV/
Vis (DME): λ ) 412, 476, 577, 716 nm; Calcd for DyIC12H30O6: C, 20.99;
H, 4.40; I, 36.96; Dy, 23.66. Found: C, 20.81; H, 4.29; I, 37.11; Dy, 24.4.
DyI2(DME)3 crystallizes in the space group C2/c with a ) 24.9195(13) Å, b
) 13.0439(7) Å, c ) 14.4466(8) Å, R ) 90°, â ) 115.8070(10)° γ ) 90°, V
) 4227.5(4) Å3 and Fcalcd ) 2.158 g/cm3 for Z ) 8 at 163 K. At convergence,
wR2 ) 0.0592 and GOF ) 1.033 for 246 variables refined against 5091 data
(As a comparison for refinement on F, R1 ) 0.0232 for those 4501 data with
I > 2.0σ(I)).
(9) Bochkarev, M. N.; Fedushkin, I. L.; Fagin, A. A.; Petrovskaya, T. V.;
Ziller, J. W.; Broomhall-Dillard, R. N. R.; Evans, W. J. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 133-135.
(10) Meyer, G. Chem. ReV. 1988, 88, 93-107 and references therein.
(11) Bochkarev, M. N.; Fagin, A. A. Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5, 2990-2992.
(13) Evans, W. J.; Broomhall-Dillard, R. N. R.; Ziller, J. W. Polyhedron
1998, 17, 3361-3370.
(14) Shannon, R. D. Acta Crystallogr. 1976, A32, 751-767.
10.1021/ja0034949 CCC: $19.00 © 2000 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 11/11/2000