Communications
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201103568
À
C H Functionalization
À
Computationally Guided Stereocontrol of the Combined C H
Functionalization/Cope Rearrangement**
Yajing Lian, Kenneth I. Hardcastle, and Huw M. L. Davies*
À
Developing practical methods for C H functionalization has
attracted considerable attention from the synthetic commun-
ity.[1] One of the major challenges in this field is to achieve
transformations that are not only site selective, but also
stereoselective.[2] One highly stereoselective intermolecular
the transition states for other products were energetically
accessible. In particular, the s-cis chair transition state was
only 2 kcalmolÀ1 more stable than the s-cis boat transition
state. Inspired by the computational studies, the current study
is directed towards switching the diastereoselectivity of the
CHCR reaction by forcing the reaction to proceed through
the s-cis boat transition state B instead of the s-cis chair
transition state A (Figure 1).
À
À
C H functionalization method is the combined C H func-
tionalization/Cope rearrangement (CHCR) between allylic
C H bonds and vinylcarbenoid compounds. This trans-
[3]
À
formation can generate two new stereocenters. When chiral
dirhodium catalysts such as [Rh2{(S)-dosp}4][4] (see Scheme 2)
are used, the products are formed essentially as single
diastereomers and in the majority of cases with > 97% ee.
This method has been developed into a powerful protocol for
the synthesis of natural products and pharmaceutical tar-
gets.[3] In all of the studies reported to date, the stereochem-
istry is consistent with a reaction occurring on the s-cis
conformation of the vinylcarbenoid and proceeding through a
chair transition state, as illustrated in [Eq. (1)].
Figure 1. The chair and boat transition states for the CHCR reaction.
TMS=trimethylsilyl.
To limit the number of potential transition states available
for the CHCR reaction, the study described herein was
conducted with b-siloxyvinyldiazoacetates. The carbenoid
derived from (E)-vinyldiazoacetates has little preference for
the s-trans over the s-cis configuration,[5] whereas the internal
substituent in the vinylcarbenoid derived from the b-silox-
yvinyldiazoacetate strongly prefers the s-cis configuration.[5]
In the s-trans configuration, the siloxy group would point
towards the “wall” of the catalyst (Scheme 1).
Previous studies have shown that [Rh2{(S)-ptad}4]
(Scheme 2) is the optimum chiral catalyst for asymmetric
reactions with siloxyvinyldiazoacetate 1.[7] To test a baseline
substrate, the [Rh2{(S)-ptad}4]-catalyzed reaction of diazo-
acetate 1 with the siloxycyclohexene 2a was examined
[Eq. (2); TFT= trifluorotoluene, TBDPS = tert-butyldiphe-
nylsilyl]. Characterizable material was obtained by hydrolysis
Recently, we completed a detailed computational study of
the CHCR reaction.[5] The reaction was shown to be an
asynchronous process, involving an initial hydride transfer
event followed by carbon–carbon bond formation. Even
though all the previously reported examples of CHCR
reactions are highly diastereoselective, the calculations
showed that different product outcomes are possible, depend-
ing on whether the s-cis or s-trans configurations of the
vinylcarbenoid species[6] are involved and whether the
reaction proceeds through a chair or a boat transition state.
Furthermore, the calculations on a model system showed that
[*] Y. Lian, Dr. K. I. Hardcastle, Prof. Dr. H. M. L. Davies
Department of Chemistry, Emory University
1515 Dickey Drive, Atlanta, GA 30322 (USA)
E-mail: hmdavie@emory.edu
[**] This material is based on work supported by the National Science
Foundation under the Center for Chemical Innovation in Stereose-
À
lective C H Functionalization (CHE-0943980) and by the National
Institutes of Health (GM080337).
Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW
Scheme 1. The s-cis and s-trans configurations of the rhodium carbe-
noid derived from 1.
9370
ꢀ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 9370 –9373