Article
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 48, No. 14, 2009 6893
verifies these assignments and the identification of this
new U(VI) molecule.
clear increase of the major SUO2 absorptions in solid
argon and neon on annealing indicates that reaction 1 is
spontaneous and requires no activation energy.
Similar information is found in the neon matrix spec-
trum. The major bands are 13.3 and 13.8 cm-1 higher in
the more weakly interacting neon matrix host, but the
isotopic characteristics are almost identical to the argon
matrix values. See for example the oxygen 16/18 iso-
topic frequency ratios and the 32S16,18O2 and 32S18O2
frequency patterns in Table 1. Nearly the same 12.9 and
14.8 cm-1 blue shifts from argon to neon are observed for
two modes of the 1A1 ground state UO3 molecule, which
are typical matrix shifts.29 These comparisons further
support our identification of the SUO2 molecule.
U þ SO2 f SUO2
ð1Þ
SUO2 Structure. The computed C2v structure for
SUO2, is analogous to that for UO3.1-6 Two bond length
changes in the UO3, SUO2, and US3 molecule series,
Figure 4, are noteworthy. The OdUdO bond lengths
˚
decrease 0.022 A on sulfur substitution in the third
˚
position, and this UdS bond is 0.045 A longer than
computed for US3. Our NBO analysis reveals an increase
in the U 5f configuration from 2.75 to 2.81 to 2.87 and U
6d configuration from 1.52 to 1.64 to 2.24 in the series
UO3, SUO2, and US3. The natural charges on U decrease
1.95f1.66f0.80 in the series, as less charge is withdrawn
by the less electronegative S, seems to sustain stronger
U-O bonds in UO3 compared to SUO2.
It is interesting the compare harmonic frequencies
calculated for the SUO2 molecule using the B3LYP
hybrid density functional and the BPW91 pure density
functional. As is generally found, the hybrid func-
tional predicts slightly higher frequencies than the pure
density functional.26,30 The OdUdO stretching fre-
quencies for the SUO2 molecule are predicted about 30
cm-1 higher with the hybrid functional. The gaseous
molecule is not known, but extrapolating from argon to
neon to gas phase predicts these two modes near 925 and
855 cm-1, which are very close to the B3LYP values. Note
that the lower BPW91 frequencies are within 5 cm-1 of the
argon matrix values. So here the BPW91 functional clearly
underestimates the OdUdO stretching frequencies, and
the B3LYP functional predicts frequencies very close to
extrapolated gas phase values for the SUO2 molecule.
It is also interesting to compare the calculated and
observed frequencies for the SUO2 molecule with those for
the analogous UO3 molecule. The calculated OdUdO
angle in the SUO2 molecule, 158.8°, is slightly smaller
than the corresponding 159.2° angle for the UO3 molecule
presumably owing to greater repulsions for the larger
sulfur electron cloud. This is attested by the still smaller
151.0° SdUdS angle in US3 calculated here with the same
method. On going from UO3 to SUO2 the antisymmetric
OdUdO stretching mode is blue-shifted 42.1 cm-1
(B3LYP) or 39.0 cm-1 (neon matrix), and the symmetric
mode is red-shifted 27.4 cm-1 (B3LYP), but this much
weaker mode is not observed for the UO3 molecule in
solid neon. Hence, the small decrease in the OdUdO
angle and interaction with S lone pairs triple the infrared
intensity of the symmetric OdUdO stretching mode in
the SUO2 molecule.
The C2v structure for UO3 is well established, and the
related SUO2 molecule follows suit with a very similar
structure. This is in marked contrast to the pyramidal,
C3v, structure of the similar WO3 molecule.32,33 One
is thus tempted to conclude that the special angular proper-
ties of the UO3, SUO2, and US3 molecular structures are
due to the involvement of U 5f orbitals, which are not
present with the symmetrical WO3 molecule. Dyall has
carefully discussed the consequences of f-orbital partici-
pation on molecular shapes.34 We note above the increase
in both U 5f and 6d configurations with increasing
electron density at the U center (decrease in positive
charge), but the increase in 6d is much more pronounced
that that for 5f. As a result the U-S bond lengths are
˚
more nearly equal in US3 (difference 0.01 A) than are the
˚
U-O bonds in UO3 (difference 0.042 A) where the latter
has the more dominant 5f involvement.
SUO2+ Identification. The sharp 987.5 cm-1 band
shows no sulfur-34 shift so this absorption is not due to
a precursor mode, and in this region it is therefore most
likely due to an antisymmetric OdUdO vibration. The
shift to 938.3 cm-1 and the oxygen 16/18 isotopic fre-
quency ratio 1.05244 are again characteristic of an anti-
symmetric OdUdO vibration, and the weak mixed 16, 18
component at 969.4 cm-1 with 16,18/16,16 ratio 1.01867
completes this characterization as found in similar iso-
topic frequency ratios for SUO2 above. In solid neon this
band blue shifts 18.0 cm-1 to 1005.5 cm-1. The dioxygen-
18 counterpart at 955.5 cm-1 again defines the antisym-
metric OdUdO vibration isotopic ratio 1.05233, and the
mixed oxygen isotopic counterpart at 986.8 cm-1 gives
almost the same single oxygen isotopic substitution ratio,
1.01895, as the argon matrix observations.
The SUO2 molecule is formed directly in the concerted
highly exothermic reaction 1, which is computed as -196
kcal/mol at the B3LYP level in the absence of spin orbit
coupling. The O atom dissociation from SO2 is suffi-
ciently high (121 kcal/mol)31 to make UO stripping
unlikely as attested by the detection of only a trace of
UO at 819.7 cm-1 beside the major product band in
Figure 1. Reaction 1 may proceed through insertion to
form OUSO followed by immediate rearrangement in the
matrix cage to the more stable U(VI) product SUO2. The
The position of this antisymmetric OdUdO vibration
above that for UO2+ itself (Table 1) suggested the possible
SUO2+ assignment, so calculations were performed for
the latter cation. Our B3LYP calculation predicted a very
strong antisymmetric OdUdO vibration for this 2B2
ground state cation at 1027.5 cm-1 with no sulfur-34 shift
(29) Jacox, M. E. Chem. Phys. 1994, 189, 149.
(30) (a) Scott, A. P.; Radom, L. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 16502. (b)
Andersson, M. P.; Uvdal, P. L. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 2937. (c) von
Frantzius, G.; Streubel, R.; Brandhorst, K.; Grunenberg, J. Organometallics
(32) Bare, W. D.; Souter, P. F.; Andrews, L. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102,
8279. (Mo, W+O2).
ꢀ
2006, 25, 118. (d) Iche-Tarrat, N.; Marsden, C. J. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112,
(33) Zhou, M.; Andrews, L. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 111, 4230. (Cr, Mo,
7632.
W+O2 in neon).
(31) Okabe, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 73, 762. D[OS-O].
(34) Dyall, K. Mol. Phys. 1999, 96, 511.