G Model
CCLET-3420; No. of Pages 6
Y.-Q. Zheng et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters xxx (2015) xxx–xxx
3
Table 1
Table 2
Screening reaction conditions for the domino reaction of 1a with 2.a
Additives screening for the domino reaction of 1a with 2.a
O
Yield (%)i
ee (%)j
O
Entry
Additive
Time (h)
Ph
Ph
1
M. S. (20 mg)
M. S. (40 mg)
PhCO2H
48
96
99
75
68
70
72
76
67
71
76
71
69
73
75
71
73
78
81
74
72
78
79
81
76
73
69
71
73
cat. (20 mol %)
CN
2
.
NC
CN
+
toluene, 23 oC
3b
75
97
4b
2,4-(NO2)2PhCO2H
p-MeOPhCO2H
o-OHPhCO2H
HOAc
114
66
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
67
OH
O
NH2
5b
1a
2
3a
6b
114
120
120
72
7b
Entry
Catalyst
Solvent
Time (h)
Yield (%)b
ee (%)c
8b
TFA
1
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
4f
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
DCM
24
49
>99
>99
>99
94
68
34
9b
TsOH
2
10c
11c
12c
13c
14c
15c
16c
17d
18e
19f
20g
21g,h
22g
23g
24c
25c
PhOH
37
3
28
ꢀ46
ꢀ21
67
p-MePhOH
p-MeOPhOH
p-NO2PhOH
2,4,6-(NO2)3PhOH
144
144
144
168
144
144
48
85
4
144
36
96
5
99
32
6
72
87
0
99
7
4g
4h
4i
72
39
ꢀ11
32
a
b
a
a
a
a
a
-Naphthol
-Naphthol
-Naphthol
-Naphthol
-Naphthol
-Naphthol
-Naphthol
43
8
168
168
168
168
168
80
49
81
9
76
ꢀ13
49
>99
93
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21d
4j
66
72
4k
4l
43
ꢀ15
ꢀ22
13
168
168
168
168
120
37
99
46
>99
>99
>99
>99
96
4m
4n
4a
4a
4a
4a
4a
4a
4a
89
80
88
36
R-BINOL
S-BINOL
tBuOH
28
>99
98
48
CHCl3
21
56
Ether
30
77
58
CF3CH2OH
78
>99
PhCF3
24
>99
73
49
a
Unless otherwise noted, all the reactions were performed with 0.1 mmol of 1a,
0.12 mmol of malononitrile 2, 20 mol% of quinine 4a, and the corresponding
additive in 1 mL of solvent at 23 8C. HOAc = CH3CO2H, TFA = Trifluoroacetic acid,
TsOH = p-Toluenesulfonic acid.
THF
30
6
MeOH
28
96
<5
68
Toluene
48
94
a
Unless otherwise noted, all of the reactions were performed with 0.1 mmol of
3a, 0.12 mmol of malononitrile 2, and 20 mol% of catalyst in 1 mL of solvent at 23 8C.
DCM = dichloromethane, THF =Tetrahydrofuran.
b
5 mol% of additive.
c
One equivalent of additive.
d
20 mol% of additive.
b
Isolated yield after flash chromatography on silica gel.
e
30 mol% of additive.
c
Determined by HPLC on a chiral AS-H column.
f
40 mol% of additive.
d
The reaction was performed at 0 8C.
g
50 mol% of additive.
h
20 mg of M.S. was added.
i
Isolated yield after flash chromatography on silica gel.
j
carboxylic acids and sulfonic acids were also examined (entries
7–9) and acetic acid enhanced the ee value from an original value
of 68–76% (entry 7). Considering the strong acidity of carboxylic
acids, in the following study we performed the tandem reaction of
1a with malononitrile in the presence of less acidic phenolic
compounds (entries 10–23) [12e,h]. When one equivalent of
phenol and its analogues were added in the cascade reaction, a
significant decrease in reactivity was observed and prolonged
reaction time was required in almost all cases. The use of phenolic
compounds improved the enantioselectivity to a greater extent
when compared to carboxylic and sulfonic acids (entries 10–23 vs.
3–9). The electronic effect on the aromatic ring of phenol was not
apparent (entries 11–14 vs. 10). The electron-rich para-methyl
substituted phenol afforded 75% ee (entry 11) while the electron-
poor 2,4,6-trinitrophenol delivered 78% ee (entry 14). Further
Determined by HPLC on a chiral AS-H column.
It further confirmed that it’s the quinine rather than the additives
that played a crucial role during the course of asymmetric
induction. Finally, alcohols were found to slightly enhance the
enantioselectivity (entries 24 and 25).
Having established the optimal reaction conditions, we
subsequently examined the substrate scope of the domino reaction
of functionalized chalcone 1 and malononitrile 2. As summarized
in Table 3, all the reaction proceeded smoothly in the presence of
20 mol% quinine and 50 mol%
a-naphthol in toluene and the
desired chromenes were generated in high yields (75%–99%) and
moderate to good enantioselectivity (49%–84% ee). The substrate
scope study revealed that electron-donating and electron-with-
drawing groups, locating at the phenyl group adjacent to the
carbonyl group, were all well tolerated. All the substrates 1b–g
underwent efficient cascade reactions with malononitrile, afford-
ing the desired heterocycles in high yields (entries 2–7). Generally
speaking, the substrates containing electron-withdrawing groups
afforded comparable ee values with the substrates containing
electron-donating groups (entries 5–7 vs. 3–4). An ortho-substi-
tuted chalcone 1b produced the corresponding product with
poorer enantioselectivity (49% ee), probably caused by the steric
effect of the methyl group (entry 2). Moreover, reactions with
heteroaryl-containing substrates 1h–i proceeded well and the
desired products were obtained with moderate stereoselectivity
(entries 8 and 9). Notably, a pronounced positive additive effect
studies indicated that
electivity and 81% ee was detected (entry 15). However,
only generated the desired compound with 74% ee (entry 16).
Considering the poor conversion of -naphthol, the subsequent
a
-naphthol greatly improved the enantios-
b
-naphthol
a
investigation focused on the loading of additive. A decrease in
loading led to a significant conversion enhancement (entries
17–20). The transformation completed within 72 h in the presence
of 20 or 30 mol%
reduced (entries 17 and 18). Fortunately, the enantioselectivity
remained in the presence of 50 mol% -naphthol and almost
quantitative yield was obtained after one week (entry 20). Next, we
added -naphthol together with the molecular sieves to the
a-naphthol, however, the enantioselectivity also
a
a
reaction. This resulted in an inferior enantioselectivity (76% ee)
(entry 21). The chiral additive 1,10-bi-2-naphthol (BINOL) was also
evaluated [12g] (entries 22 and 23) and poorer stereo control was
observed for both additives. Both (R)-BINOL and (S)-BINOL
afforded the desired heterocycles with the same configuration.
was observed again in 1b–i when the
a-naphthol was involved
under otherwise identical conditions (entries 2–9, data outside
brackets vs. data in brackets). Up to 37% enantioselectivity
improvement was observed in the case of 1i with a thienyl group
(entry 9). We next investigated the effect of another phenyl group
Please cite this article in press as: Y.-Q. Zheng, et al., Enantioselective synthesis of 2-amino-3-nitrile-chromenes catalyzed by cinchona