CHEMMEDCHEM
FULL PAPERS
with an FTMS-2000 instrument. HRMS data were collected with an
Agilent QTOF 6520.
by performing an assay in mice with gastric cancer (MGC-803).
Oridonin and compound 29 were administered intraperitoneal-
ly 40 mgkgÀ1 in a vehicle of 1% DMSO, 2% poloxamer, and
97% saline. The positive control group was treated with pacli-
taxel (10 mgkgÀ1) through intravenous injection. The negative
control group received 0.9% normal saline through intraperito-
neal injection. Results are shown in Table 2. Compound 29 ex-
Compound 8: Compound 7 (364 mg, 1 mmol) was dissolved in
H2O (10 mL). NaIO4 (3.16 g, 14.8 mmol) was added to this solution,
and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 h and ex-
tracted with CH2Cl2. The CH2Cl2 layer was washed with brine, dried
over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated to give compound
8 (360 mg, 99%) as a white powder; mp: 183–1858C; 1H NMR
([D6]DMSO, 500 MHz): d=6.18 (1H, d, J=3.3 Hz, 6-OH), 5.92 (1H, s,
17-CH2), 5.52 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 5.38 (1H, d, J=2.1 Hz, 14-OH), 5.17
(1H, d, J=2.1 Hz, 6-CH), 4.67 (1H, s, 14-CH), 4.65–4.63 (1H, m, 1-
CH), 3.87, 3.58 (each 1H, dd, JA =JB =9.1 Hz, 20-CH2), 2.95 (1H, d,
J=9.1 Hz, 13-CH), 2.49–2.40 (2H, m, 12-CH2), 1.70–1.67 (2H, m, 2-
CH2), 1.40–1.36 (2H, m, 11-CH2), 1.29–1.25 (1H, m, 9-CH), 0.93 (3H,
s, 18-CH3), 0.88 ppm (3H, s, 19-CH3); 13C NMR ([D6]DMSO, 300 MHz):
d=200.30, 166.88, 150.42, 118.59, 100.73, 72.81, 71.28, 62.18, 54.99,
53.78, 49.86, 47.67, 43.07, 36.44, 32.67, 30.70, 29.55, 23.22, 22.82,
18.75 ppm; IR (KBr): v˜max =3450, 1754, 1645 cmÀ1; MS(ESI) m/z:
747.4 [2M+Na]+; HRMS (ESI, M+H) m/z calcd for C20H27O6:
363.1802, found: 363.1799.
Table 2. Antitumor activity of compound 29 in mice with MGC-803 gas-
tric cancer.[a]
Compd
Mouse weight [g]
Tumor weight [g]
Inhib. [%]
–
Start
End
Saline
15.41Æ0.55
23.45Æ1.19
1.26Æ0.24
(control)
Paclitaxel
Oridonin
29
15.37Æ0.47
15.49Æ0.35
15.45Æ0.89
23.98Æ1.87
22.69Æ1.35
23.27Æ1.23
0.36Æ0.15
0.79Æ0.09
0.45Æ0.11
71.43*
37.30**
64.28*
[a] Number of mice in each group was 10; all mice completed treatment;
weights given are the mean ÆSD. *p<0.01, **p<0.05.
Compound 9: Compound 8 (72 mg, 0.2 mmol) was dissolved in
acetone. Jones reagent was added dropwise to this solution until
a red color persisted. The mixture was stirred at 08C for 15 min.
The mixture was then diluted with H2O and extracted with CH2Cl2.
The extract was washed with brine, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4,
filtered, and evaporated to give compound 9 (63 mg, 87%) as
a white powder; mp: 248–2508C; 1H NMR ([D6]DMSO, 300 MHz):
d=5.95 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 5.57 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 5.53 (1H, d, J=3.5 Hz,
14-OH), 4.79–4.76 (1H, m, 14-CH), 4.76–4.72 (1H, m, 1-CH), 4.51,
3.69 (each 1H, dd, JA =JB =9.9 Hz, 20-CH2), 3.00 (1H, d, J=9.6 Hz,
13-CH), 1.08 (3H, s, 18-CH3), 0.95 ppm (3H, s, 19-CH3); 13C NMR
([D6]DMSO, 300 MHz): d=200.25, 175.45, 166.31, 149.84, 119.45,
73.78, 71.03, 70.98, 61.66, 50.19, 47.42, 45.77, 42.87, 35.50, 32.66,
31.83, 29.09, 23.42, 22.87, 18.15 ppm; IR (KBr): v˜max =3508, 1785,
1751, 1645 cmÀ1; MS(ESI) m/z: 361.1 [M+H]+; HRMS (ESI, M+H)
m/z calcd for C20H25O6: 361.1646, found: 361.1647.
hibited a stronger antitumor activity (tumor inhibitory ratio of
64.28%) than that of parent compound oridonin (37.30%) and
only slightly less potent than that of paclitaxel (71.43%) in
MGC-803 mice. Thus, compound 29 is worthy of further inves-
tigation as a potential anticancer drug candidate.
Conclusions
The findings arising from the studies described above open
a possible approach to the development of novel enmein-type
diterpenoid analogues as potential anticancer agents. In this
effort, a novel semisynthetic library of enmein-type diterpenoid
derivatives with potent in vitro and in vivo antitumor activities
was prepared from commercially available starting materials.
Furthermore, the molecular mode of action revealed that de-
rivative 29 caused cell-cycle arrest and induced apoptosis in
Bel-7402 cells through oxidative-stress-triggered mitochondria-
related caspase 3-, 8-, and 9-dependent pathways. It is expect-
ed that the mechanistic and biological studies described, to-
gether with our previous reports of different kinds of diterpe-
noids,[10,12] could expedite the development of new diterpe-
noid-based therapeutic agents for clinical cancer intervention.
General procedure for the synthesis of enmein-type diterpe-
noids 10–30: Compound 9 (72 mg, 0.2 mmol) was mixed with the
corresponding acid (0.24 mmol), EDCI (0.4 mmol), and DMAP
(0.02 mmol) in 15 mL CH2Cl2. After stirring at room temperature for
8–12 h, the mixture was poured into 15 mL 10% HCl and extracted
with CH2Cl2 (3ꢁ10 mL). The organic layer was combined, washed
sequentially with H2O and saturated NaCl solution, dried over an-
hydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product
was purified by column chromatography (MeOH/CH2Cl2 1:100 v/v)
to give the title compounds. Data for compounds 10–28 and 30
are listed in the Supporting Information.
Compound 29: Yellow powder (41 mg, 46%): mp: 150–1528C;
1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): d=9.12 (1H, s, Ar-H), 8.77 (1H, s, Ar-H),
8.19 (1H, d, J=7.9 Hz, Ar-H), 7.39–7.28 (1H, m, Ar-H), 6.25 (1H, s,
17-CH2), 6.09 (1H, s, 14-CH), 5.68 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 4.66–4.62 (1H, m,
1-CH), 4.38, 4.11 (each 1H, dd, JA =JB =10.6 Hz, 20-CH2), 3.37 (1H,
d, J=9.3 Hz, 13-CH), 1.22 (3H, s, 18-CH3), 1.07 ppm (3H, s, 19-CH3);
13C NMR (CDCl3): d=196.92, 175.11, 165.63, 164.53, 153.87, 151.00,
146.65, 137.38, 124.87, 123.33, 121.74, 74.58, 74.31, 71.20, 59.37,
50.72, 47.53, 45.99, 40.41, 36.28, 32.99, 32.14, 29.49, 23.54, 23.01,
19.04 ppm; IR (KBr): v˜max =2925, 1762, 1731, 1647, 1591, 1282,
1188, 1023, 916, 736, 701 cmÀ1; MS(ESI) m/z: 446.2 [M+H]+; HRMS
(ESI, M+H) m/z calcd for C26H28NO7: 466.1860, found: 466.1856.
Experimental Section
Chemistry
General: All commercially available solvents and reagents were
used without further purification. Melting points were taken on an
XT-4 micro melting point apparatus and uncorrected. IR spectra
(KBr) were recorded on a Nicolet Impact 410 instrument (KBr
pellet). 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded with a Bruker AV-
300 or ACF-500 spectrometer in the indicated solvents (TMS as in-
ternal standard); chemical shifts (d) are expressed in ppm, and cou-
pling constants (J) are reported in Hz. Mass spectra were obtained
ꢀ 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
ChemMedChem 2013, 8, 812 – 818 816