´
A. Pejovic et al. / Polyhedron 31 (2012) 789–795
790
thus, we decided to screen their antimicrobial activity against sev-
eral bacteria and one fungal strain.
2.2.1. 2-Ferrocenyl-2,3-dihydroquinolin-4(1H)-one (4a)
M.p. 150 °C; 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3, ppm) d = 7.86 (dd, J = 7.7,
1.4 Hz, 1H, H5), 7.33 (ddd, J = 7.7, 6.3, 1.4 Hz, 1H, H7), 6.77 (brt,
J ꢀ 7.4 Hz, 1H, H6), 6.72 (brd, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H, H8), 4.65 (brs, 1H,
NH), 4.45 (dd, J = 12.4, 4.6 Hz, 1H, H2), 4.27–4.31 (m, 1H, Fc),
4.19–4.25 (m, 8H, Fc, 5H from the unsubstituted Cp and 3H from
the substituted Cp), 2.87 (ddd, J = 16.2, 4.6, 1.2 Hz, 1H, H3eq),
2.74 (dd, J = 16.2, 12.4 Hz, 1H, H3ax); 13C NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3,
ppm): d = 193.5 (C4), 151.2 (8a), 135.3 (C7), 127.6 (C5), 118.9
(C4a), 118.1 (C6), 115.7 (C8), 89.3 (C10), 68.5 (C100–C500), 68.3, 68.2
(C20, C50), 66.7, 66.1 (C30, C40), 52.9 (C2), 45.9 (C3); IR (KBr):
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials and instruments
All chemicals were commercially available and used as re-
ceived, except that the solvents were purified by distillation.
Microwave Labstation for Synthesis, MicroSynth, Milestone appa-
ratus equipped with pressure and temperature control units was
used for the microwave assisted syntheses. Ultrasonic cleaner
Elmasonic S 10, 30 W was used for the ultrasonically supported
synthesis.
m
= 3323, 3078, 2991, 1651, 1608, 1507, 1480, 1321, 769 cmꢁ1
.
Anal. Calc. for C19H17FeNO: C, 68.90; H, 5.17; N, 4.23. Found: C,
68.87; H, 5.14; N, 4.25%.
Chromatographic separations were carried out using silica gel
60 (Merck, 230–400 mesh ASTM), whereas silica gel 60 on Al
plates, layer thickness 0.2 mm (Merck) was used for TLC. Melting
points (uncorrected) were determined on a Mel-Temp capillary
melting points apparatus, model 1001. Microanalysis of carbon,
hydrogen and nitrogen were carried out with a Carlo Erba 1106
microanalyser; their results agreed favorably with the calculated
values. The 1H and 13C NMR spectra of the samples in CDCl3 were
recorded on a Varian Gemini (200 MHz) spectrometer. Chemical
shifts are expressed in d (ppm), relative to the residual solvent pro-
tons or 13CDCl3 as internal standards (CHCl3: 7.26 ppm for 1H and
77 ppm for 13C). IR measurements were carried out with a Perkin–
Elmer FTIR 31725-X spectrophotometer.
2.2.2. 6-Chloro-2-ferrocenyl-2,3-dihydroquinolin-4(1H)-one (4b)
M.p. 144 °C; 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): d = 7.82 (d,
J = 2.5 Hz, 1H, H5), 7.26 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.5 Hz, 1H, H7), 6.66 (d,
J = 8.5 Hz, 1H, H8), 4.66 (brs, 1H, NH), 4.45 (dd, J = 13.5, 4.0 Hz,
1H, H2), 4.25–4.28 (m, 1H, Fc), 4.20–4.24 (m, 8H, Fc, 5H from the
unsubstituted Cp and 3H from the substituted Cp), 2.87 (ddd,
J = 16.5, 4.0, 1.5 Hz, 1H, H3eq), 2.73 (dd, J = 16.5, 13.5 Hz, 1H,
H3ax); 13C NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): d = 192.4 (C5), 149.5
(C8a), 135.2 (C7), 126.9 (C5), 123.5 (C6), 119.6 (C4a), 117.3 (C8),
88.9 (C10), 68.6, 68.4 (C20, C50), 68.3 (C100–C500), 66.6, 66.1 (C30,
C40), 52.9 (C2), 45.4 (C3); IR (KBr):
m = 3340, 2924, 1657, 1615,
1501, 1480, 1408, 1294, 816 cmꢁ1. Anal. Calc. for C19H16ClFeNO:
C, 62.41; H, 4.41; N, 3.83. Found: C, 62.37; H, 4.44; N, 3.79%.
2.2. Preparation of quinolinones 4a–c
2.2.3. 6-Bromo-2-ferrocenyl-2,3-dihydroquinolin-4(1H)-one (4c)
M.p. 179 °C; 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): d = 7.96 (d,
J = 2.5 Hz, 1H, H5), 7.38 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.5 Hz, 1H, H7), 6.61 (d,
J = 8.5 Hz, 1H, H8), 4.66 (brs, 1H, NH), 4.44 (dd, J = 13.0, 3.5 Hz,
1H, H2), 4.25–4.27 (m, 1H, Fc), 4.20–4.24 (m, 8H, Fc, 5H from the
unsubstituted Cp and 3H from the substituted Cp), 2.87 (ddd,
J = 16.5, 4.0, 1.5 Hz, 1H, H3eq), 2.73 (dd, J = 16.5, 13.0 Hz, 1H,
H3ax); 13C NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): d = 192.2 (C4), 149.9
(C8a), 137.8 (C7), 130.0 (C5), 120.1 (C4a), 117.6 (C8), 110.4 (C6),
88.8 (C10), 68.5, 68.4 (C20, C50), 68.3 (C100–C500), 66.6, 66.1 (C30,
The solution of 214 mg (1 mmol) of ferrocenecarboxaldehyde
(1), 1 mmol of the corresponding o-aminoacetophenone (1-(2-ami-
nophenyl)ethanone (2a), 1-(2-amino-5-chlorophenyl)ethanone
(2b) and 1-(2-amino-5-bromophenyl)ethanone (2c)) and 100 mg
of NaOH in 10 mL of ethanol was stirred overnight at room temper-
ature. The solvent was evaporated and to the residue 10 mL H2O
was added. The solution was neutralized with 2 M HCl (litmus pa-
per), extracted with CH2Cl2 (three 20 mL portions) and the com-
bined organic layers dried overnight (anhydrous Na2SO4). The
solvent was evaporated and the residue chromatographed over a
short pad of SiO2 (hexane/ethyl acetate 9:1, v/v). After the evapo-
ration of the solvent, the obtained solids (chalcones 3a–c) were
submitted to an intramolecular cyclization reaction by applying
one of the following three methods:
C40), 52.7 (C2), 45.3 (C3); IR (KBr):
m = 3327, 2924, 1657, 1600,
1494, 1394, 1284, 820 cmꢁ1. Anal. Calc. for C19H16BrFeNO: C,
55.65; H, 3.93; N, 3.42. Found: C, 55.60; H, 3.97; N, 3.41%.
2.3. X-ray crystallography
Method A: Chalcones 3a–c (1 mmol) were mixed with 100 mg of
montmorillonite K-10 in a mortar with a pestle, placed into a Tef-
lon cuvette and irradiated for 5 min in a microwave oven at 500 W,
without the presence of a solvent. After 10 min of cooling down to
room temperature, the crude mixture was extracted with ethyl
acetate and the obtained solution dried overnight (anhydrous
Na2SO4). The solvent was evaporated and the residue purified by
column chromatography (SiO2, hexane/ethyl acetate 9:1, v/v).
Method B: Chalcones 3a–c (1 mmol) were dissolved in the mix-
ture of 3 mL glacial acetic acid and 3 mL of 90% orthophosphoric
acid and stirred at room temperature for 50 min. The reaction mix-
ture was poured into ice–water mixture, extracted with ethyl ace-
tate (three 25 mL portions), the obtained solution washed with
NaHCO3, and dried overnight over anhydrous Na2SO4. After the sol-
vent was evaporated, the residue was purified by column chroma-
tography (SiO2, hexane/ethyl acetate 9:1, v/v).
Single-crystal X-ray analysis of three ferrocene derivatives:
2-ferrocenyl-2,3-dihydroquinolin-4(1H)-one (4a), 6-chloro-2-ferr-
ocenyl-2,3-dihydroquinolin-4(1H)-one (4b) and 6-bromo-2-ferr-
ocenyl-2,3-dihydroquinolin-4(1H)-one (4c) was performed. X-ray
diffraction data for all three compounds were collected at room
temperature and using two single-crystal diffractometers, Enraf–
Nonius CAD4 (for 4a) and Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Sapphire3
Gemini (for 4b and 4c). Both diffractometers were equipped with
Mo Ka radiation (k = 0.71073 Å). X-ray data 4b and 4c were
processed with CrysAlis software [33] with multi-scan absorption
corrections applied using SCALE3 ABSPACK [33].
All three crystal structures were solved with SHELXS [34] and re-
fined using SHELXL [34]. The H1n atom attached to N1 was located
by difference Fourier synthesis and refined isotropically. All other
H atoms were placed at geometrically calculated positions with
the C–H distances fixed to 0.93 from C(sp2); 0.97 and 0.98 Å from
methylene and methine C(sp3), respectively. The corresponding
isotropic displacement parameters of the hydrogen atoms were
equal to 1.2 Ueq and 1.5 Ueq of the parent C(sp2) and C(sp3),
respectively.
Method C: A round bottom flask containing the solution of chal-
cones 2a–c, 1 mmol in the above mentioned mixture of acetic and
phosphoric acids (around 6 mL), was placed in an ultrasonic clea-
ner and irradiated for 50 min. The reaction mixture was worked
up as given in Method B.