the reported synthetic strategies are based either on the
formation of the C1ÀN or C5ÀN bond through intramo-
lecular reductive amination or on the late formation of the
C1ÀCH2R bond through the use of an electrophilic imino-
sugar donor (Figure 1).6
aspects to develop a new powerful strategy toward piper-
idine iminosugar C-glycosides based on the alkylation
of a seven-membered electrophilic iminosugar and its
subsequent ring isomerization. This approach should al-
low tuning of the substituents at C-1 and C-6. We have
previously disclosed the synthesis of seven-membered imi-
nosugar homologues of glycosidase inhibitor noeuromycin
starting from a sugar-based azidolactol 1 and exploiting a
Staudinger/aza-Wittig ring expansion.15 Since this transfor-
mation proceeds by a two-step reduction, trapping of the
intermediate seven-membered imine by an organometallic
species instead of hydride should allow selective functiona-
lization at the C-7 position. Subsequent azepane ring iso-
merization through 3-OH group activation should provide
the corresponding six-membered iminosugar C-glycosides
displaying structural diversity at C-6 (Scheme 1).
Figure 1. Structures of Glyset and Zavesca and general strate-
gies to access iminosugar C-glycosides.
The intermolecular approach, inspired from the syn-
thetic strategies developed in the field of C-glycosides,
appears as the best strategy for late stage diversification.
It has been less explored due to the difficult generation of
stable electrophilic iminosugars. Piperidinose donors have
been developed by Johnson,7 Vasella,8 and Schmidt,9 and
nucleophilic addition to the endocyclic CdN bond of a six-
membered iminosugar-derived cyclic imine or nitrone has
been reported by Davis10 and Vasella11 respectively. These
elegant routes focus on introduction of various substitu-
ents at C-1 but usually do not allow decoration at other
positions of the piperidine ring. Such modification could
be of interest to increase their biological potency and/or
selectivity. One exception is the SAWU strategy developed
by Overkleeft which enables the synthesis of a library of
iminosugar C-glycosides displaying diversity both at C-1
and at the endocyclic nitrogen.12 Introduction ofstructural
diversity at both C-1 and C-6 has not been developed
despite the fact that it should give rise to novel sugar
mimetics with enhanced potency through hydrophobic
interaction with protein residue side chains. Our interest
in the synthesis13 and skeletal rearrangement14 of seven-
membered iminosugars prompted us to combine both
Scheme 1. New Strategy Developed Herein to Access Iminosu-
gar C-Glycosides
Initial attempts using triphenylphosphine and starting
from azidolactol 1, easily available from methyl
glucopyranoside,16 failed to furnish the pure imine 2 in
good yield. More encouraging results were obtained by
switching tothepolymer-bound triphenylphosphine. After
optimization of the reaction conditions, a major product
was isolated in 62% yield and assigned to the bicyclic N,O-
acetal 317 by NMR (signals at 5.06 and 88.7 ppm in the 1H
and 13C NMR spectra respectively for the hemiaminal
moiety). It results from the trapping of the transient seven-
membered imine 2 by the free 3-OH group (Scheme 2).
This electrophilic bicycle can be seen as a stable form of
2 allowing introduction of hydrophobic groups at C-7
through organometallic addition. The reactivity of N,O-
acetals with organometallics is well-documented18 but has
(6) Compain, P.; Chaignault, V.; Martin, O. R. Tetrahedron: Asym-
metry 2009, 20, 672–711.
(7) Johnson, C. R.; Golebiowski, A.; Sundram, H.; Miller, M. W.;
Dwaihy, R. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 653–654.
(8) Granier, T.; Vasella, A. Helv. Chim. Acta 1998, 81, 865–880.
(9) Fuchss, T.; Streicher, H.; Schmidt, R. R. Liebigs Ann. Recl. 1997,
1315–1321.
(10) (a) Maughan, M. A. T.; Davies, I. G.; Claridge, T. D. W.;
Courtney, S.; Hay, P.; Davis, B. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42,
3788–3792. (b) Davis, B. G.; Maughan, M. A. T.; Chapman, T. M.;
Villard, R.; Courtney, S. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 103–106.
(11) Peer, A.; Vasella, A. Helv. Chim. Acta 1999, 82, 1044–1065.
(12) Timmer, M. S. M.; Risseeuw, M. D. P.; Verdoes, M.; Filippov,
D. V.; Plaisier, J. R.; Van der Marel, G. A.; Overkleeft, H. S.; Van Boom,
J. H. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2005, 16, 177–185.
ꢀ
(15) Li, H.; Zhang, Y.; Vogel, P.; Sinay, P.; Bleriot, Y. Chem.
Commun. 2007, 183–185.
(16) (a) Kobertz, W. R.; Bertozzi, C. R.; Bednarski, M. D. J. Org.
Chem. 1996, 61, 1894–1897. (b) Chakraborty, T. K.; Ghosh, S.;
Jayaprakash, S.; Sharma, J. A. R. P.; Ravikanth, V.; Diwan, P. V.;
Nagaraj, R.; Kunwar, A. C. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 6441–6457.
(17) Similar bicyclic [5,6] N,O-acetals derived from sugars have been
reported: (a) Lafont, D.; Wollny, A.; Boullanger, P. Carbohydr. Res.
1998, 310, 9–16. (b) Beacham, A. R.; Smelt, K. H.; Biggadike, K.;
Britten, C. J.; Hackett, L.; Winchester, B. G.; Nash, R. J.; Griffiths,
R. C.; Fleet, G. W. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 151–154. (c) Fuentes, J.;
Gasch, C.; Olano, D.; Pradera, M. A.; Repetto, G.; Sayago, F. J.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2002, 13, 1743–1753.
ꢀ
(13) (a) Marcelo, F.; He, Y.; Yuzwa, S. A.; Nieto, L.; Jimenez-
ꢀ
Barbero, J.; Sollogoub, M.; Vocadlo, D. J.; Davies, G. J.; Bleriot, Y.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 5390–5392. (b) Li, H.; Liu, T.; Zhang, Y.;
Favre, S.; Bello, C.; Vogel, P.; Butters, T. D.; Oikonomakos, N. G.;
ꢀ
Marrot, J.; Bleriot, Y. ChemBioChem 2008, 9, 253–260. (c) Li, H.;
ꢀ
Bleriot, Y.; Chantereau, C.; Mallet, J.-M.; Sollogoub, M.; Zhang, Y.;
Rodriguez-Garcia, E.; Vogel, P.; Jimenez-Barbero, J.; Sinay, P. Org.
ꢀ
(18) (a) Bloch, R. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 1407–1438. (b) Enders, D.;
Reinhold, U. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997, 8, 1895–1946. (c) Steinig,
A. G.; Spero, D. M. Org. Prep. Proc. Int. 2000, 32, 205–234.
Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 1492–1499.
ꢀ
(14) Liu, T.; Zhang, Y.; Bleriot, Y. Synlett 2007, 905–908.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 3, 2012
871