Electrochemical Synthesis of Organophosphorus Compounds through SNAr
ment by means of a thermostat, was used to set up the three-elec-
trode system for cyclic voltammetry. For cyclic voltammetry experi-
ments, the working electrode was a glassy carbon disk of 0.5 mm
diameter. It was polished by using a 1 μm diamond paste. The co-
unterelectrode was a Pt disk of 1 mm diameter. All of the potentials
are measured relative to an aqueous saturated calomel electrode
(SCE) isolated from the working electrode compartment by a salt
bridge. The salt solution of the reference calomel electrode was
separated from the electrochemical solution by a salt-bridge ending
with a frit, made of a ceramic material, which permits ionic con-
ductivity between the two solutions and thus avoids appreciable
contamination. The electrolyte solution present in the bridge (or-
ganic solvent and 0.1 m supporting electrolyte) is the same as that
used for the electrochemical solution so as to minimize junction
potentials. Solutions were prepared in N,N-dimethylformamide
(DMF) as solvent and were purged with nitrogen (or argon) before
each measurement, and nitrogen (or argon) was allowed to flow
over the solution during the measurements.
Diphenyl(2,4,6-trinitrophenyl)phosphane Oxide (14): 1H NMR
(250 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 9.00 (s, 2 H), 7.97 (s, 5 H), 7.76 (s, 5 H)
ppm. 31P NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 17.7 ppm.
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Ministerio
de Educación y Ciencia of Spain through projects CTQ2006-01040
and CTQ 2009-07469.
[1] J. March, Advanced Organic Chemistry, 4th. Ed., Wiley, New
York, 1992, ch. 13, p. 641.
[2] E. Buncel, J. M. Dust, F. Terrier, Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 2261.
[3] O. N. Chupakhin, V. N. Charushin, H. C. Van der Plas, Nucleo-
philic Aromatic Substitution of Hydrogen, Academic Press, New
York, 1994.
[4] F. Terrier, Nucleophilic Aromatic Displacement (Ed.: H. Feuer),
VCH, New York, 1991.
Electrosynthesis was carried out in the same cell with a PAR 273A
potentiostat. A graphite rod was used as a working electrode and
Pt as a counter electrode, isolated from the solution by a salt bridge
with electrolyte solution, and the SCE was used as a reference elec-
trode, which was also separated from the solution by a salt bridge.
[5] I. Gallardo, G. Guirado, J. Marquet, Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7,
1759.
[6] G. Moutiers, J. Pinson, F. Terrier, R. Goumont, Chem. Eur. J.
2001, 7,1712.
[7] I. Gallardo, G. Guirado, J. Marquet, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002,
2, 251.
Procedure for the Electrochemical Synthesis of Phosphorus Substitu-
tion Products: A solution of nitroarene (5ϫ10–5 mol) in DMF,
which contained TBABF4 (0.1 m) used as a supporting electrolyte,
was prepared under nitrogen (or argon). The corresponding σH
complex was prepared by careful addition of the corresponding
nucleophile (and potassium tert-butoxide in the indicated cases), at
the desired ratio, to the solution of nitroarene under nitrogen (or
argon). The oxidation peaks of the σH complex or zwitterionic in-
termediates were measured by the cyclic voltammetry technique.
Electrosynthesis of oxidation was then carried out at potentials that
were more positively shifted, by approximately 100 mV, than the
value measured for each σ complex or zwitterionic complex. After
thorough electrolysis of the sample, the mixture was subsequently
partitioned between water and toluene. The organic layer was dried
with anhydrous sodium sulfate, the solvents were evaporated at low
pressure, and the residue was analyzed by CV, GC, 1H and 31P
NMR spectroscopy and compared with pure samples of substitu-
tion products. This residue was finally purified by thin layer
chromatography and the nitroorganophosphorus compounds were
obtained at high purity. The σH complexes and zwitterionic inter-
mediates of NASH processes are stable for more than one hour,
whereas the stability of zwitterionic intermediates of NASX is con-
siderably lower (less than 30 min).
Diethyl(2,4,6-trinitrophenyl) Phosphonate (12): 1H NMR
(250 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.66 (d, J = 3.35 Hz, 2 H), 4.33 (m, J =
7.025 Hz, J = 3.025 Hz, 4 H), 1.42 (m, J = 7.025 Hz, J = 8.025 Hz,
6 H) ppm. 31P NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3): δ = –1.80 ppm.
Dimethyl(2,4,6-trinitrophenyl) Phosphonate (13): 1H NMR
(250 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.68 (d, J = 3.325 Hz, 2 H), 3.95 (d, J =
11.725 Hz, 6 H). 31P NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.17 ppm. MS:
m/z(%) = 290 (15)[M – OCH3]+, 275(3), 244(4), 231(100), 199(11),
153 (6), 109 (28).
[8] I. Gallardo, G. Guirado, J. Marquet, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002,
2, 261.
[9] H. Cruz, I. Gallardo, G. Guirado, Green Chem. 2011, 13, 2531.
[10] I. Gallardo, G. Guirado, J. Marquet, J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68,
631.
[11] I. Gallardo, G. Guirado, J. Marquet, J. Org. Chem. 2003,
63,7334.
[12] I. Gallardo, G. Guirado, J. Marquet, J. Org. Chem. 2002,
67,2548.
[13] I. Gallardo, G. Guirado, J. Marquet, J. Electroanal. Chem.
2000, 488, 64.
[14] I. Gallardo, G. Guirado, J. Marquet, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008,
2463.
[15] G. A. Artamkina, M. P. Egorov, I. P. Beletskaya, Chem. Rev.
1982, 82, 427.
[16] P. P. Onys’ko, Y. G. Gololobov, Z. Obshch. Khim. 1980, 50, 729.
[17] P. P. Onys’ko, Y. G. Gololobov, Z. Obshch. Khim. 1979, 49, 39.
[18] P. P. Onys’ko, Y. G. Gololobov, V. P. Prokopenko, Dokl. Akad.
Nauk SSSR 1977, 237, 105.
[19] H. Fleisch, Breast Cancer Res. 2002, 4, 30.
[20] C. M. Andújar Sánchez, M. J. Iglesias, J. García López, I. J.
Pérez Álvarez, F. López Ortiz, Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 3648.
[21] M. Makosza, K. Wojciechowski, Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 2631.
[22] M. Makosza, D. Sulikowski, J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 3827.
[23] I. Gallardo, G. Guirado, Electrochem. Commun. 2007, 9, 173.
[24] V. A. Zagumennov, E. V. Nikitin, A. S. Romakhin, I. P. Kosa-
chev, Elektrokhimiya 2000, 36, 157.
[25] J. L. Bourdelande, I. Gallardo, G. Guirado, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2007, 129, 2817.
[26] I. Gallardo, G. Guirado, J. Marquet, N. Vilà, Angew. Chem.
2007, 119, 1343; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 1321.
[27] S. Marque, P. Tordo, Top. Curr. Chem. 2005, 250, 43.
[28] S. Yasui, K. Shioji, M. Tsujimoto, A. Ohno, Tetrahedron Lett.
1996, 37, 1625
Received: September 16, 2011
Published Online: October 25, 2011
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 7378–7389
© 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.eurjoc.org
7389