C. Andreu, M. del Olmo / Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic 92 (2013) 57–61
59
anti- 1H NMR (CDCl3): 1.27 (d, 6.3 Hz, 3H), 1.5 (s, 1H), 1.90–1.93
(m, 2H), 3.6 (s, 1H), 4.05–4.15 (m, 1H), 5.58–5.62 (m, 1H), 7.35 (dd,
8.0, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.57 (dd, 7, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.85–7.89 (m, 2H) ppm.
Enantiomeric excess: HPLC, Chiralpak IC column, Hex/iprOH
92/8, 1 mL/min, 254 nm, ((+)1S,3S 25.81; (−)1R,3S 17.38 min).
O
OH
O
O
Biocat.
+
H
X
X
2a (X= 4-NO2)
2b (X= 2-NO2)
2c (X= 3-NO2)
2d (X= 4-Cl)
1a (X= 4-NO2)
1b (X= 2-NO2)
1c (X= 3-NO2)
1d (X= 4-Cl)
2.3.3. 1-(3-Nitrophenyl)-1,3-butanediol (3c)
syn- 1H NMR (CDCl3): 1.27 (d, 6.3 Hz, 3H), 1.6 (s, 2H), 1.79–1.84
(m, 2H), 4.17–4.24 (m, 1H), 5.04–5.09 (m, 1H), 7.54–7.64 (m, 1H),
7.71–7.74 (m,1H), 8.11–8.14 (m, 1H), 8.24–8.26 (m, 1H) ppm.
anti- 1H NMR (CDCl3): 1.29 (d, 6.3 Hz, 3H), 1.58 (s, 1H), 1.90–1.94
(m, 2H), 3.57 (s, 1H), 4.06–4.12 (m, 1H), 5.16–5.20 (m, 1H),
7.50–7.53 (m, 1H), 7.71–7.73 (m,1H), 8.10–8.14 (m, 1H), 8.25–8.27
(m, 1H) ppm.
1e (X= 2-Cl)
Scheme 1. Biocatalytic aldol reaction.
(2.5% water in acetone used as a solvent) [8]. In all cases, the R
enantiomer was obtained in moderate excess, the stereoselectivity
being slightly better when K. marxianus was used as a catalyst.
In reactions carried out in a 1:1 mixture of acetone and water as
a solvent at 30 ◦C, the reaction was quantitative after 72 h (as shown
in Scheme 1), but no stereoselectivity was achieved with any of the
catalysts under these conditions (less than 5% ee). Unfortunately,
the reaction was effective only when strongly activated aldehydes
were used as substrates.
It is worth mentioning that under both conditions the carbonyl
reduction of the starting materials does not occur, and only the
these microorganisms under different conditions. So, first of all, we
checked their ability to reduce the racemic aldol product derived
from 4-nitrobenzaldehyde and acetone ( 2a) using fresh cells in
aqueous medium (2% glucose w/v). Scheme 2 shows the comple-
mentary results obtained for both biocatalysts.
K. marxianus showed excellent stereoselectivity in the resolu-
tion of the racemic starting material and allowed the recovery of the
S enantiopure aldol (S-2a,95% ee). Moreover excellent enantioselec-
tivity (95%) was achieved in the 1,3-diol product of the reduction
reaction. Indeed, the syn diol with the 1R,3R configuration was
almost the only product. On the other hand, P. jardinii was unable
to resolve the racemic mixture, and both diastereomers (rela-
tion syn:anti 1.17) with excellent enantioselectivity were obtained
(1S,3S–3a, 95% ee and 1R,3S–3a, 99% ee).
Enantiomeric excess: HPLC, Chiralpak IC column, Hex/iprOH
95/5, 1 mL/min, 254 nm, ((−)1S,3S 60.1 min; (+)1R,3S 31.4 min).
2.3.4. 1-(4-Chlorophenyl)-1,3-butanediol (3d)[10]
syn- 1H NMR (CDCl3): 1.24 (d, 6.0 Hz, 3H), 1.69–1.87 (m, 2H),
2.64 (s, 1H), 3.38 (s, 1H), 4.10–4.19 (m, 1H), 4.93 (dd,9.6, 3.3 Hz,1H),
7.31 (s, 4H) ppm.
anti- 1H NMR (CDCl3): 1.25 (d, 6.3 Hz, 3H), 1.84–1.89 (m, 2H),
2.1 (s, 1H), 3.04 (s, 1H), 4.04–4.10 (m, 1H), 5.03–5.07 (m,1H), 7.31
(s, 4H) ppm.
Enantiomeric excess: HPLC, Chiralpak IA column, Hex/iprOH
97/3, 1 mL/min, 214 nm, ((+)1R,3R 29.1 min; (−)1S,3S 28.04 min;
(+)1R,3S 36.8 min).
2.3.5. 1-(2-Chlorophenyl)-1,3-butanediol (3e) [10]
syn- 1H NMR (CDCl3): 1.19 (d, 6.0 Hz, 3H), 1.56–1.67 (m, 1H),
1.81–1.87 (m, 1H), 2.7 (s, 1H), 3.46 (s, 1H), 4.13–4.22 (m, 1H), 5.28
(dd, 9.9, 1.8 Hz; 1H), 7.13 (dd, 6.6, 1.8 Hz,1H) 7.21–7.26 (m, 2H),
7.55–7.58 (m, 1H) ppm.
anti- 1H NMR (CDCl3): 1.22 (d, 6.0 Hz, 3H), 1.84–1.87 (m, 2H), 2.1
(s, 1H), 3.2(s, 1H), 3.98–4.04 (m, 1H), 5.36–5.42 (m,1H), 7.13 (dd, 6.9,
1.8 Hz,1H) 7.24 (dd, 7.8, 0.9 Hz, 2H), 7.55–7.59 (m, 1H) ppm.
Enantiomeric excess: HPLC, Chiralcel ODH column, Hex/iprOH
98/2, 1 mL/min, 214 nm, ((+)1R,3R 24.13 min; (−)1S,3S 45 min;
(+)1R,3S 32.7 min).
Both microorganisms showed a different enantioselectivity in
K. marxianus and S when P. jardinii was used), and three of the
four possible diol stereoisomers were available. In order to obtain
the 1,3-diol with 1S,3R configuration, we unsuccessfully screened
seven other yeast strains [11]. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Lalvin T-
73, Torulospora delbrueckii, Saccharomyces cerevisiae FY86, Pichia
2.3.6. 1-Phenyl-1,3-butanediol (3f)[13]
syn- 1H NMR (CDCl3): 1.23 (d, 6.0 Hz, 3H), 1.73–1.93 (m, 2H),
2.89 (s, 1H), 3.09 (s, 1H), 4.13–4.18 (m, 1H), 4.95 (dd, 9.9, 3 Hz, 1H),
7.35–7.37 (m, 5H) ppm.
anti- 1H NMR (CDCl3): 1.25 (d, 6.0 Hz, 3H), 1.86–1.93 (m, 2H), 2.2
(s, 1H), 2.84 (s, 1H), 4.05–4.11 (m, 1H), 5.04–5.1 (m, 1H),7.35–7.40
(m, 5H) ppm.
Enantiomeric excess: HPLC, Chiralpak IC column, Hex/iprOH
96/4, 1 mL/min, 214 nm, ((+)1R,3R 35.2 min; (−)1S,3S 24.7 min;
(+)1R,3S 28.46 min).
Table 1
Scope of aldehydes for the aldol reaction with acetone under optimized conditions.
Aldehyde
Biocatalyst
Conversion (%)a
Product/ee (%)b
3. Results and discussion
1a[8]
1a[8]
1b
1b
1c
1c
1e
P. jardinii
K. marxianus
P. jardinii
K. marxianus
P. jardinii
P. jardinii
K. marxianus
P. jardinii
K. marxianus
35
42
25
25
30
30
nd
nd
80
60
(R)–2a/30
(R)–2a/38
(R)–2b/35
(R)–2b/47
(R)–2c/27
(R)–2c/44
(R)–2d/33
(R)–2d/50
(R)–2e/39
(R)–2e/50
Microorganisms used as whole cell catalysts can display dif-
ferent enzymatic activities depending on the medium conditions
and the substrates supplied [3,4]. In a previous work, we stud-
ied the ability of several yeast strains to carry out asymmetric
4-(4-nitrophenyl)-4-hydroxybutan-2-one (2a). For this purpose,
lyophilized cells from stationary phase cultures were employed.
In the present work, we wanted to extend the reaction described
above to other biocatalysts and substrates. Scheme 1 and Table 1
show the results obtained with the microorganisms K. marxianus
and P. jardinii for the reaction of different activated benzaldehy-
des and acetone under conditions that were previously optimized
1e
Conditions [8]: lyophilized biocatalyst (40 mg), substrate (4 mg), water in acetone
(2.5-vol.%, 2.5 mL), 25 ◦C; 96 h.
a
Conversion: determined by 1H NMR. No reaction was observed in the absence
of biocatalyst.
b
Determined by chiral HPLC. Absolute configuration according to literature data
[12].