Table 1 Enantioselective epoxidation of alkenes by [RuVI(por*)O2]
future catalysts for efficient aerobic enantioselective epoxida-
tion without the need of a sacrificial reducing agent.
Supports from the Hong Kong Research Grants Council, The
University of Hong Kong and City University of Hong Kong are
gratefully acknowledged.
Stoichiometrica
Catalytic aerobicb
Entry Substrate
Product
% yieldc
% eed turnover no.e % eed
O
61f 65 (R)f,g
22
10
70 (R)
1
Notes and References
benzaldehyde
5
1
†E-mail: cmche@hkucc.hku.hk
2-phenylacetaldehyde 13
‡ 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3), d 0.8–2.4 (m), 2.58 (s, 8 H), 3.80 (s, 8 H),
7.44 (m, 4 H, ArH), 8.73 (s, 8 H, pyrrolic H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3),
d 27.183, 27.565, 42.417, 44.403, 49.339, 113.988, 118.923, 127.908,
130.780, 141.533, 144.272, 148.062. FABMS+: m/z 1274 (M+, 35%), 1258
(M+ 2 O, 23%), 1242 (M+ 2 2O, 98%).
O
72 (1R, 2S)h 20 69 (1R, 2S)
21i 73 (1R, 2S)i
2
64
O
§ Crystallographic data for 2: [Ru(por*)O2]·3MeCN): C90H85N7O2Ru, M
= 1397.78, monoclinic, space group P21 (no. 4), a = 14.734(2), b =
18.447(3), c = 15.627(3) Å, b = 110.61(2)°, U = 3975(1) Å3, Z = 2, Dc
= 1.170 g cm23, F(000) = 1468, m = 2.48 cm21, crystal dimensions 0.10
3 0.05 3 0.30 mm. Diffraction data were collected at 28 °C on a MAR
diffractometer with a 300 mm image plate detector using graphite
monochromated Mo-Ka radiation (l = 0.710 73 Å). The images were
interpreted and intensities integrated using program DENZO. 3692 Unique
and independent reflections were obtained, 3048 with I > 3s(I) were used
in the structural analysis. These reflections were in the range h 0–13, k 0–17,
l 215 to 15 with 2qmax = 51.2°. The structure was solved by Patterson
methods and expanded by Fourier methods (PATTY) and refinement by
full-matrix least squares using the software package TeXsan on a Silicon
Graphics Indy computer. In the least-squares refinement, in view of the
large thermal parameters of the four chiral radical C16H17, only the Ru atom
was refined anisotropically and all the other 99 non-H atoms were refined
isotropically and 88 H atoms at calculated positions with thermal
parameters equal to 1.3 times that of the attached C atoms were not refined.
Convergence for 405 variable parameters by least-squares refinement on F
with w = 4Fo2/s2(Fo2), where s2(Fo2) = [s2(I) + (0.063Fo2)2] for 3048
reflections with I > 3s(I) was reached at R = 0.084 and wR = 0.117 with
a goodness-of-fit of 3.00, (D/s)max = 0.04 for atoms of the porphyrin
skeleton. The final difference Fourier map had maximum positive and
negative peaks of 1.15 and 0.51 e Å23 respectively. CCDC 182/892.
5
n.d.
2
n.d.
n.d.
3i
O
66f
20f
—
11
14
—
52 (R)
56
3
O
O
45 (R)j
71
4
71
61
Cl
Cl
5
a
Stoichiometric reactions were conducted at room temperature for 12 h;
oxidant 4 mg, substrate 200 mg, pyrazole 50 mg in 5 ml CH2Cl2 unless
otherwise stated. b Reactions were performed at room temp. at ca. 8 atm for
22–24 h; catalyst 4 mg and substrate 40 mg in 4 ml CH2Cl2 unless otherwise
stated. c Yield were calculated based on the amount of ruthenium complex.
Enantiomeric excesses were determined by chiral GC (J&W Scientific
Cyclodex B; length 30 m for entries 1, 2, 4 and 5, chiraldex G-TA, 30 m for
entry 3). The product yields for the calculation of turnover no. were
determined by GC with p-dichlorobenzene or p-bromochlorobenzene as
internal standards. f In benzene. g Absolute configuration was determined by
d
e
h
comparison with an authentic sample.
Absolute configuration was
determined by matching the order of elution of the two enantiomers on a
Cyclodex-B column. i In toluene. j Absolute configuration was determined
by comparing its 1H NMR spectrum in the presence of Eu(hfc)3 with that of
a sample of known enantiomeric composition, J. T. Groves and R. S. Myres,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1983, 105, 5791.
1 Metalloporphyrins in Catalytic Oxidations, ed. R. S. Sheldon, M.
Dekker, New York, 1994; B. Meunier, Chem. Rev., 1992, 92, 1411.
2 J. T. Groves and R. Quinn, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1985, 107, 5790.
3 W. H. Leung, C. M. Che, C. H. Yeung and C. K. Poon, Polyhedron,
1993, 12, 2331.
4 T. Mukaiyama, T. Yamada, T. Nagata and K. Imagawa, Chem. Lett.,
1993, 327.
5 R. L. Halterman and S. T. Jan, J. Org. Chem., 1991, 56, 5253.
6 A. Berkessel and M. Frauenkron, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1997,
2265.
O
8 atm O2, catalyst 2
*
Ar
*
R
Ar
R
CH2Cl2, room temp.
Scheme 2
7 W. C. Lo, C.-M. Che, K. F. Cheng and T. C. W. Mak, Chem. Commun.,
1997, 1205.
a [Ru(por*)(C9H10O)] ion peak [m/z = 1377 (20%)]. The
dioxoruthenium(vi) complex is likely to be the active inter-
mediate of the reaction, since with the exception of 1,2-dihy-
dronaphthalene, both the catalytic and stoichiometric reactions
produced similar ee for the same substrate, and thus the
mechanism of this reaction could be similar to that of the
[Ru(tmp)O2] (H2tmp = tetramesitylporphyrin) system reported
by Groves and Quinn.2 As the Ru–D4-porphyrin moiety has
survived the oxidation, we envisage that high catalytic turn-
overs can be achieved through optimizing the reaction condi-
tions. Thus this work has provided a starting point for designing
8 J. T. Groves and R. Quinn, Inorg. Chem., 1984, 23, 3844.
9 W. H. Leung and C.M. Che, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989, 111, 8812.
10 W. C. Cheng, W. Y. Yu, K. K. Cheung and C. M. Che, J. Chem. Soc.,
Dalton Trans., 1994, 57.
11 J. P. Collman, X. Zhang, V. J. Lee, E. S. Uffelman and J. I. Brauman,
Science, 1993, 261, 1404.
12 R. L. Halterman, S. T. Jan, H. L. Nimmons, D. J. Standlee and M. A.
Khan, Tetrahedron, 1997, 53, 11257.
13 E. N. Jacobsen, W. Zhang, A. R. Muci, J. R. Ecker and L. Deng, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1991, 113, 7063.
Received in Cambridge, UK, 12th March 1998; 8/02009D
1584
Chem. Commun., 1998