U. Ragnarsson, L. Grehn / Tetrahedron Letters 53 (2012) 1045–1047
1047
Table 2
Substrate stability of 1-X1-2-X2-hydrazides toward TMG
Entry
X
X1
X2
Product:substrate ratio/timea (selected data)
Estimated half-lifeb
1
2
3
4
5
4
5
6
7
1
Ts
Ts
Ts
Ts + Boc
Ts
H
Boc
Z
H
Ts
0.76/1.8; 1.48/8.7
0.86/171; 1.20/219
0.94/227; 1.15/266
See discussion in the text
For details, see Supplementary data
4
190
240
n.d.
<1.5 min
a
0.1 mmol Substrate in (CD3)2SO (ca. 590 lL) + 1.25 equiv TMG at RT; measured (always Ts–Me, in several cases also aromatic Ts signals) sulfinate product: substrate ratio
by 1H NMR spectroscopy/days.
b
Days (by linear interpolation).
supply of base is limited. As no product other than 2 could be iso-
lated in these experiments we conclude that the claim of Wessig
and Henning is not correct.
(8), formally by substitution on the Boc-carbonyl group. It remains
to be demonstrated that similar compounds can be made in the
same way.
The half-lives of the other compounds as determined in Table 2
together with 1 span a range of more than 5 orders of magnitude,
of which 3–3.5 refer to the introduction of the second tosyl group.
The dramatic behavior of 1 toward bases as reflected in Table 1 and
illustrated visually by the evolution of nitrogen as described above
are interesting in this perspective.
Ts-NHNH2 Ts-NHNH-Boc Ts-NHNH-Z
4
5
6
In the initially mentioned method to prepare sulfones,2a the
authors reacted tosyl hydrazide (4) and alkyl or activated aryl ha-
lides in boiling ethanol with sodium acetate as the base. The reac-
tion required an excess of halide and base and typical reaction
times of 3–24 h to go to completion. Interestingly, the authors
claimed that in addition to tosyl, some of the halides were also re-
duced. For comparison with 1, we investigated the stability of 4 to-
ward TMG in DMSO (Table 2, entry 1) and found that it also
decomposed into sulfinate, exclusively, but with a half-life of a
few days instead of minutes, suggesting 1 as a more reactive, much
milder alternative to 4 in this context. It should be pointed out that
a large number of sulfonyl analogs of 1 have also been described.15
Introduction of a Boc-group on tosyl hydrazide-N2 5 had an
opposite effect in comparison with that of a second tosyl. Com-
pound 516a only reacted very slowly to give a sulfinate (entry 2).
This result was corroborated for its Z-analog 616b which exhibited
similar reactivity (entry 3). In these measurements with 5 and 6,
over several months, the observed chemical shifts drifted to a var-
iable degree toward lower field, least for Ts–Me, and most for the
Ts-3,5-proton signals ( 0.008 and 0.028 ppm, respectively), but
the conversions into sulfinate seemed to take place without detect-
able intermediates and were completely selective.
Acknowledgment
This work was initiated with funds from Magn. Bergvalls Stift-
else and is gratefully acknowledged.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (starting materials and synthetic proce-
dures used, NMR and HRMS spectral data, primary kinetic data
for 1) associated with this article can be found, in the online ver-
References and notes
1. For a recent summary on applications of tosyl hydrazide, see: Chamberlin, A.
R., ; Sheppeck, J. E., II; Goess, B.; Lee, C. In Paquette, L. A., Crich, D., Fuchs, P. L.,
Molander, G. A., Eds.; Encyclopedia of Reagents for Organic Synthesis;
Chichester: Wiley, 2009; 12, pp 9634–9645. 2nd ed.
2. (a) Ballini, R.; Marcantoni, E.; Petrini, M. Tetrahedron 1989, 45, 6791; (b) Pasto,
D. J.; Taylor, R. T. Org. React. 1991, 40, 91.
3. Namba, K.; Shoji, I.; Nishizawa, M.; Tanino, K. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4970. and
references therein.
4. Toma, T.; Shimokawa, J.; Fukuyama, T. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3195.
5. Rasmussen, L. K. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 3627.
6. (a) Ragnarsson, U.; Grehn, L.; Koppel, J.; Loog, O.; Tšubrik, O.; Bredikhin, A.;
Mäeorg, U.; Koppel, I. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 5916. and references therein; (b)
Ragnarsson, U. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2001, 30, 205.
7. It should be pointed out that for the sake of simplicity in this Letter Ts is used as
an abbreviation for 4-CH3C6H4SO2 independent of its state of oxidation or
charge.
Ts-NNH2 Ts-NNH2
NMe2
CO-N C
Boc
NMe2
7
8
8. Rooney, C. S.; Cragoe, E. J., Jr.; Porter, C. C.; Sprauge, J. M. J. Med. Pharm. Chem.
1962, 5, 155.
9. Keith, J. M.; Gomez, L. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 7113.
10. See for example: Simpkins, N. S. Sulfones in Organic Synthesis; Pergamon Press:
Oxford, 1993.
11. Mosettig, E. Org. React. 1954, 8, 232.
12. Matin, S. B.; Craig, J. C.; Chan, R. P. K. J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39, 2285.
13. Jennings, K. F. J. Chem. Soc. 1957, 1172.
14. Wessig, P.; Henning, H.-G. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1991, 983.
15. Bartmann, E. A. Synthesis 1993, 490.
16. (a) Ragnarsson, U.; Grehn, L.; Maia, H. L. S.; Monteiro, L. S. J. Chem. Res. 2000, (S)
6; (M) 129.; (b) Grehn, L.; Nyasse, B.; Ragnarsson, U. Synthesis 1997, 1429; (c)
Grehn, L.; Ragnarsson, U. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 4843.
Interestingly, substrate 716c with a Boc-group on the tosyl
hydrazide-N1 reacted rather differently with TMG than the other
compounds studied in Table 2 (entry 4). After about two days the
substrate was no longer detectable and at least two products had
formed. The major product was isolated from a small-scale pre-
parative experiment (for details see Supplementary data). Based
on spectroscopic data it was tentatively assigned a structure of a
semicarbazide that had incorporated TMG, Ts–N(NH2)–CO–TMG