neighboring columns could fit well together if mutually
rotated by 1808 in an antiparallel configuration. In contrast,
the two side groups at each end of the related terphenyl
compounds (Figure 1d) would clash, hence the longitudinal
front plane in Figure 3a). Moreover, in Figure S4 in the
Supporting Information we added together three electron-
density maps of Figure 3b with three in-plane orientations:
ꢀ608, 08 and + 608. The combined map is almost indistin-
guishable from that of the hexagonal phase in Figure 3a.
Thus, we can conclude that the bundle columns are actually
noncircular ribbons even in the P6/mmm phase, and XRD
gives the time–space average. The reason for the noncircular
shape is thought to be the need for the side chains on all
biphenyls to access the surface and the peripheral corona, a
situation unachievable with 14 biphenyls densely packed in a
circular cylinder. Incidentally, there is a continuous slow
increase in the number of molecules in a bundle as temper-
ature decreases (see d spacing vs. temperature plot in Fig-
ure S3 and Table S2 in the Supporting Information). This
widening of the ribbons helps stop their rotation and locks
them in a mutually parallel orientation, with the consequent
P6/mmm!Cmmm symmetry breaking.
ꢀ
shift in the R3m phase.
On decreasing the temperature, a transition to a lamellar
phase (see Figure 2b,e) takes place via an intermediate phase
(for powder SAXS of the complete series on cooling, see
Figure 2g). The transition exotherms are relatively broad, and
in the XRD patterns the intermediate phase can only be
found coexisting with one of the two adjacent phases (see also
the GISAXS pattern in Figure S2 and the temperature
dependence of d spacings in Figure S3 in the Supporting
Information). All but one of the diffraction peaks of the
intermediate phase index on a rectangular 2D lattice of c2mm
symmetry with lattice parameters a = 6.33 nm and b =
4.30 nm (see Table S1 in the Supporting Information). How-
ever, the (001) reflection of the P6/mmm phase persists in the
intermediate phase unaltered. Hence, the intermediate phase
is 3D orthorhombic, c = 1.80 nm, space group Cmmm. As can
be seen from the maps in Figure 3a,b, at the P6/mmm–Cmmm
transition the averaged column cross section turns from
circular to elliptical. Figure 3b also shows the presence of
undulating RF-rich columns lying perpendicular to the main
biphenyl columns. Thus, this crossed column mesophase
consists of two orthogonal interpenetrating sets of columns,
the modulated columns of the rod bundles and the undulating
RF-rich columns.[14]
Interestingly, the P6/mmm–Cmmm transition occurs by
continuous deformation of the hexagonal lattice (see the
splitting of the (100P6/mmm) reflection into (110Cmmm) and
(200Cmmm) in Figure 2g and Figure S3 in the Supporting
Information). This finding is indicative of a second-order
transition. Accordingly, it is expected that local domains of
orthorhombic order also exist in the hexagonal phase, with
three equally probable orientations in the xy plane; that is, the
ribbons undergo correlated rotation. The idea is illustrated in
Figure 4, where three orthorhombic cells (Figure 4a) are
superimposed (Figure 4b). Note the maxima in electron
density (purple) where three undulated ribbons overlap.
These density maxima (e.g. the two labeled 1 and 2) are
clearly seen in Figure 3a (the dotted line in Figure 4 is the
On further cooling, at the transition to the LamSm/p2mm
phase, the ribbons fuse to form infinite sheets. Indeed, the
layer spacing a = 3.24 nm is only slightly larger than a/2 =
3.16 nm of the Cmmm phase (Figure 3c). As typically
observed for T-shaped amphiphiles with large lateral sub-
stituents, in lamellar (Lam) phases the rodlike units are
parallel to the layer plane.[3,10] As shown by the persistence of
the (001) reflection through the P6/mmm–Cmmm–Lam
sequence (Figure 2g), this periodicity is retained, confirming
that the Lam phase has 2D long-range order (correlated layer
phase, LamSm/p2mm).[15] At the Cmmm–LamSm transition the
RF-rich columns are retained but change from undulated to
straight. Thus, the LamSm phase features fluorinated columns
between aromatic sheets.[16] This arrangement can be com-
pared to a similar morphology recently reported in a rod–coil
miktoarm star terpolymer.[17]
General comments on the phase sequence in laterally
substituted bolaamphiphiles can be made with reference to
Figure 1. The mesophases on the right (axial-bundle phases of
compounds with large branched side chains) and on the left
(polygonal honeycombs in compounds with smaller side
chains), are the inverse of each other. Loosely speaking, if
the aromatic and glycerol moiety is replaced by polar groups
and water, the situation is analogous to direct (left) and
inverse (right) lyotropic phases in polar and apolar amphi-
philes. Even the elliptical deformation of the column cross
section, which leads to rectangular phases when the Col–Lam
transition is approached, is similar to the behavior observed in
other self-organized amphiphilic systems. Current results
suggest that at least in some of those amphiphiles the
hexagonal phase may also consist of rotationally averaged
ribbons.
Received: May 13, 2011
Published online: September 20, 2011
Figure 4. a) Schematic top view of the crossed columns of the Cmmm
phase; b) superposition of three figures (a) after in-plane rotation by
ꢀ608, 08, and +608.
Keywords: bolaamphiphiles · liquid crystals · mesophases ·
X-ray diffraction
.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 10599 –10602
ꢀ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim